Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transfer from exterior internal control to outer boundary control

PDF p. 4: paragraph reducing boundary to internal control; PDF p. 16: Proof of Theorem 1.1 begins; PDF p. 17: restriction and trace argument; quintic transfer

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥2, let Θ⊂Rn be nonempty and compact with smooth boundary and connected exterior Ω=Rn∖Θ, and choose R0>0 with Θ⊂BR0(0). Put Ω0=BR0(0)∖Θ, Γ1=∂BR0(0) and Γ2=∂Θ. Let 1≤s≤2, T>0, m∈{3,5} and λ∈R∖{0}. Let Hs denote the Bessel-potential restriction spaces, HDs(Ω) the Dirichlet spectral space, and Xs(Ω0)={f∈Hs(Ω0):γΓ2f=0} with its inherited norm. Let E:Xs(Ω0)→HDs(Ω) be a bounded linear extension satisfying (Ef)∣Ω0=f. Write ∥E∥=sup⁡{∥Ef∥HDs:f∈Xs(Ω0), ∥f∥Xs≤1} for its operator norm.

Choose R=R0+1 and a smooth cutoff φ that vanishes on ∣x∣≤R. Let k:(0,T)×Ω→C be a measurable control. Suppose u0,u1∈Xs(Ω0) and that an exterior controlled solution v∈C([0,T];HDs(Ω)) satisfies v(0)=Eu0, v(T)=Eu1, v∣∂Ω=0, and i∂tv+Δv+λ∣v∣m−1v=φk in distributions on (0,T)×Ω. Assume the displayed nonlinear and forcing terms are locally integrable functions so that their restrictions have their usual distributional meanings.

Then u(t)=v(t)∣Ω0 and h(t)=γΓ1v(t) satisfy u∈C([0,T];Hs(Ω0)), h∈C([0,T];Hs−1/2(Γ1)), u(0)=u0, u(T)=u1, γΓ2u=0 and γΓ1u=h. Moreover i∂tu+Δu+λ∣u∣m−1u=0 in distributions on (0,T)×Ω0. Thus the outer Dirichlet boundary system is solved in this distributional and trace sense. The conclusion applies to both the cubic and quintic nonlinearities.

If, for some δ1>0, exterior controlled solutions of the stated kind exist for every pair of exterior endpoints of HDs norm at most δ1, then they exist for the extensions of every pair of states with Xs norms at most δ=δ1/∥E∥; the boundary conclusion follows for each such pair.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.

[F1]

The geometry and boundary pieces are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains. The state space and its value trace are specified by States compatible with the uncontrolled obstacle boundary, and Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality specifies the spectral norm. Under The Axiom of Choice, Lemma 3.11: extension preserving the obstacle Dirichlet condition supplies an extension E with the stated boundedness and restriction identity.

[F2]

Under the stated geometry and Choice, Low-order identifications of the Dirichlet scale identifies HDs(Ω) with Hs(Ω)∩H01(Ω), with equivalent norms, for 1≤s≤2. Here H01(Ω) is the H1 closure of Cc∞(Ω).

[F3]

The collar result Collar traces and extension across an artificial boundary supplies bounded value traces Hs(G)→Hs−1/2(S) for a smooth bounded domain and its boundary component, and for an interior smooth hypersurface. Its traces agree with the first-order trace in L2 where both apply. The first-order trace is bounded on a bounded smooth domain by The sharp trace theorem: boundedness and range in the fractional space.

[F4]

The controlled equation and the two power nonlinearities are specified by Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems; the outer Dirichlet boundary formulation is specified by Cubic NLS and boundary control formulations. Distributional equality and the need for separate trace and nonlinear-term hypotheses are specified by Distributional equation convention for complex Schrödinger solutions. Norm-continuous paths have the meaning in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces.

[F5]

For bounded linear maps between these complex normed spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum defines the unit-ball supremum and gives ∥Ef∥HDs≤∥E∥∥f∥Xs.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.

[F1] The geometry and boundary pieces are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains. The state space and its value trace are specified by States compatible with the uncontrolled obstacle boundary, and Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality specifies the spectral norm. Under The Axiom of Choice, Lemma 3.11: extension preserving the obstacle Dirichlet condition supplies an extension E with the stated boundedness and restriction identity.

[F2] Under the stated geometry and Choice, Low-order identifications of the Dirichlet scale identifies HDs(Ω) with Hs(Ω)∩H01(Ω), with equivalent norms, for 1≤s≤2. Here H01(Ω) is the H1 closure of Cc∞(Ω).

[F3] The collar result Collar traces and extension across an artificial boundary supplies bounded value traces Hs(G)→Hs−1/2(S) for a smooth bounded domain and its boundary component, and for an interior smooth hypersurface. Its traces agree with the first-order trace in L2 where both apply. The first-order trace is bounded on a bounded smooth domain by The sharp trace theorem: boundedness and range in the fractional space.

[F4] The controlled equation and the two power nonlinearities are specified by Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems; the outer Dirichlet boundary formulation is specified by Cubic NLS and boundary control formulations. Distributional equality and the need for separate trace and nonlinear-term hypotheses are specified by Distributional equation convention for complex Schrödinger solutions. Norm-continuous paths have the meaning in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces.

[F5] For bounded linear maps between these complex normed spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum defines the unit-ball supremum and gives ∥Ef∥HDs≤∥E∥∥f∥Xs.

Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the restricted equation, endpoint and boundary conditions, time regularity, and conditional transfer of the small-data radius.

1.1F1F2F4given

By the scale identification, the inclusion HDs(Ω)→Hs(Ω) is bounded. Restriction from Hs(Ω) to Hs(Ω0) is bounded: every whole-space representative of the former restricts to a representative of the latter, so the quotient norm cannot increase. Consequently u is norm-continuous in Hs(Ω0). Applying the bounded restriction to the endpoint equalities and using Ef∣Ω0=f gives u(0)=u0 and u(T)=u1.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

The sphere Γ1 lies in the interior of Ω and has a fixed bounded smooth collar disjoint from Θ. Restriction to that collar and its interior trace are bounded from Hs(Ω) to Hs−1/2(Γ1). Hence h is norm-continuous. The inner-side trace of v∣Ω0 agrees with this interior trace: both are the same classical restriction for smooth functions and the collar trace construction gives the common continuous extension. Thus γΓ1u=h.

2.2F2F3step 1.1

For each t, the scale identification gives v(t)∈H01(Ω). Choose a sequence in Cc∞(Ω) converging to v(t) in H1(Ω). Its restrictions to Ω0 converge to u(t) in H1(Ω0) and vanish near Γ2. Boundedness of the first-order trace therefore makes the H1/2 trace of u(t) vanish on Γ2. The order-s trace agrees with the first-order trace as an L2 boundary function, so the Hs−1/2 trace also equals zero. This holds at every time.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2given

Every test function compactly supported in (0,T)×Ω0 extends by zero to a test function on (0,T)×Ω. Testing the exterior equation against that extension gives the restricted distributional equation: distributional derivatives commute with restriction, the locally integrable nonlinear expression restricts to λ∣u∣m−1u, and φk=0 on Ω0 because R>R0. Together with the preceding trace and endpoint statements, this is the specified outer Dirichlet formulation for either m=3 or m=5.

4.1F1F5step 3.1given∎

The extension is nonzero: a nonzero smooth function compactly supported in Ω0 belongs to Xs(Ω0) and is recovered by restriction after applying E. Thus ∥E∥>0. If ∥uj∥Xs≤δ1/∥E∥ for j=0,1, the operator-norm inequality gives ∥Euj∥HDs≤∥E∥∥uj∥Xs≤δ1. The assumed exterior existence applies to these endpoints, and steps 1.1–2.1 then give the boundary solution. This is a conditional transfer and does not itself assert exterior controllability.

Source notes

The frozen article is cited for attribution of the reduction and its cubic and quintic uses. The proof above uses the separately supplied extension, scale and trace results and the explicitly assumed exterior solution; it does not use the article's boundary-transfer assertion as a premise.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources