How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
States compatible with the uncontrolled obstacle boundary
PDF p. 4: Theorem 1.1, definition of Xs(Ω0); PDF p. 17: Lemma 3.11
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let and let , and have the smooth obstacle and truncated-exterior geometry specified in the exterior-domain definition. Let .
Use the complex Bessel-potential Sobolev space: consists of tempered distributions for which is an function, with its corresponding norm, using the negative-sign Fourier transform. Define as the restrictions of these distributions to , with norm .
Let be the Sobolev value trace on the obstacle boundary. Its target is defined by a finite smooth boundary atlas and subordinate partition of unity, using the norms of the localized coordinate representatives. Define
The zero condition is equality in . No boundary condition is imposed on the outer boundary .
Definition references
Justification
The exterior-domain definition fixes the disjoint smooth boundary pieces and the bounded smooth truncated domain. The whole-space Fourier characterization supplies the displayed Sobolev space and norm, and the Sobolev extension and localization result supplies the restriction-quotient convention and its norm on this bounded smooth domain. The Axiom of Choice includes the choice assumptions of these suppliers.
The collar-trace result supplies a bounded linear value trace from to the stated finite-atlas boundary space for , independent of the atlas up to equivalent norms. Apply it to the obstacle boundary components; compactness and the local smooth graph structure give finitely many such components. Thus the zero-trace condition is a definite linear condition, and is its kernel, a closed linear subspace with the inherited norm. The definition does not assert a normal-derivative condition or a zero condition on the artificial outer sphere.
Source notes
The original article is cited for attribution of in Theorem 1.1, where , and for its use for in Lemma 3.11. The mathematical meaning and well-definedness above use the independent suppliers.
Depends on
Used by · 10
- Non-trapping and geometric control from infinity
- Theorem 1.1: exact outer boundary controllability
- Necessary endpoint compatibility for boundary controls
- Corollary 1.6: quintic control near zero
- Remark 5: controllability above the Sobolev algebra threshold
- Lemma 3.11: extension preserving the obstacle Dirichlet condition
- Annular extension and cutoff gluing construction
- Transfer from exterior internal control to outer boundary control
- Scope of geometric assumptions and control results
- Nonlinear control for trapping obstacle configurations
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.