Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Abstract nonlinear control-space hypotheses

PDF p. 14: Theorem 3.7, assumptions (i)–(iii)

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let T>0, s∈[1,2] and m∈{3,5}. Let Ω and HDs(Ω) be the exterior domain and Dirichlet spectral space, let W(t)=eitΔD be the free evolution, and let g(z)=λ∣z∣m−1z with λ∈R∖{0}. Write H=HDs(Ω).

A control space satisfying the abstract perturbation hypotheses is a real or complex Banach space XT of H-valued continuous paths on [0,T] whose inclusion into C([0,T];H) is linear and satisfies ∥u∥C([0,T];H)≤∥u∥XT, and for which there is one constant C0≥1 such that all of the following hold:

(i) For every u0∈H, the path t↦W(t)u0 belongs to XT and ∥W(⋅)u0∥XT≤C0∥u0∥H.

(ii) For every f∈L1(0,T;H), the retarded path Df(t)=∫0tW(t−r)f(r) dr, with the integral understood in the Bochner sense in H, is defined for each t∈[0,T], belongs to XT, and satisfies ∥Df∥XT≤C0∥f∥L1(0,T;H).

(iii) For every v∈XT, the pointwise power expression g(v) represents an element of L1(0,T;H), and for all u,v∈XT,

∥g(v)∥L1(0,T;H)≤C0∥v∥XTm,∥g(v)−g(u)∥L1(0,T;H)≤C0(∥v∥XTm−1+∥u∥XTm−1)∥v−u∥XT.

The same constant is required in all three conditions, although it may depend on the fixed domain, T, s, m and λ. These are hypotheses on XT; they do not assert that such a space exists or that any controlled equation is solvable.

Justification

The domain, nonlinearity and parameter λ are fixed by Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems, and the spectral space and its norm by Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality. The Axiom of Choice is retained from those inputs and the evolution supplier The Axiom of Choice.

A Banach space is a complete normed space over its stated scalar field Banach space. The inclusion condition therefore specifies the path represented by each element of XT and bounds every evaluation by its XT norm. The time-space conventions in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces define norm-continuous paths, strongly measurable L1 classes and Bochner integration. Condition (ii) explicitly requires the displayed integral and its XT membership; condition (iii) explicitly requires the nonlinear expression to have the stated strongly measurable integrable representative. Neither is inferred merely from pointwise notation.

The group and its strong continuity on H are supplied by Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution, so the homogeneous path in (i) is meaningful. The three conditions prescribe bounds and membership rather than deriving them from the definitions. In particular, this definition alone does not claim that multiplication by i preserves an arbitrary real XT; an argument using that operation must supply the necessary property.

Source notes

The article is cited for the formulation of assumptions (i)–(iii) in Theorem 3.7, PDF page 14. The cited local and library items provide the independent terminology; the article attribution is not used as a proof of a prerequisite or of the estimates.

Depends on

Used by · 7

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources