Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Endpoint-correcting nonlinear feedback map

PDF p. 14: Theorem 3.7 proof, definitions of N, hv and T

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice and hypothesis (H): n≥2, Θ⊂Rn is nonempty and compact with smooth boundary, its exterior Ω=Rn∖Θ is connected, and its generalized reflected rays leave every compact set in finite time. Let T>0, s∈[1,2], m∈{3,5}, and let φ be the real control cutoff associated with this exterior. Put H=HDs(Ω), W(t)=eitΔD, and g(z)=λ∣z∣m−1z for real nonzero λ. Let XT satisfy the abstract perturbation hypotheses: it is a real or complex Banach space continuously included in C([0,T];H) with inclusion norm at most one, and its homogeneous evolution, retarded forcing operator and nonlinearity satisfy conditions (i)–(iii) of that definition with a constant C0≥1.

Let G:H×H→C([0,T];H) be the bounded linear endpoint-to-control operator: for each pair (a,b), the mild solution of the linear controlled equation with initial state a and control G(a,b) has terminal state b. For prescribed v0,vT∈H and v∈XT, define

N(v)(t)=∫0tW(t−r)(ig(v)(r)) dr,hv=G(v0,vT−N(v)(T)),

and define the feedback map T:XT→XT by

T(v)(t)=W(t)v0+N(v)(t)+∫0tW(t−r)(−iφhv(r)) dr.

All integrals are Bochner integrals in H. Equivalently, the constant factors i and −i may be written outside the respective integrals as H-valued equalities. The definition itself asserts neither a fixed point nor uniqueness of a controlled nonlinear solution.

Justification

The geometry and non-trapping convention are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains, and the cutoff is that of Control region and nested real cutoffs. The Dirichlet realization, spectral Hilbert space H=HDs(Ω) and unitary group W(t)=eitΔD are those of Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality. The Banach path space, retarded operator and nonlinear estimates are specified by Abstract nonlinear control-space hypotheses; its continuous inclusion makes evaluation at T a bounded map from XT to H. The time-space and Bochner-integral conventions are those of Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces. Choice is retained as required by the stated hypotheses and the selector theorem The Axiom of Choice. In particular, the assumed Axiom of Choice supplies a choice function for every countable family of nonempty sets, as required by the continuous-path integrability lemma used below.

By the nonlinear hypothesis, g(v)∈L1(0,T;H). Multiplication by i is a bounded scalar operation on the complex Hilbert space H, so ig(v) belongs to the same L1 space. The integrability of this scalar multiple and homogeneity of the integral follow from Linearity of the Bochner integral in the complex Banach space H; complex linearity of W(t−r) then justifies the equivalent placement of scalar factors in the Definition. The retarded forcing hypothesis therefore gives N(v)∈XT and N(v)(0)=0; the latter follows because the Bochner integral over the zero-length interval is zero. Evaluation at T makes the second argument of G an element of H. Under the stated geometry, time, scale and Choice assumptions, Theorem 3.6: bounded continuous control operator supplies the bounded selector G and its continuous H-valued control hv.

The cutoff multiplication operator is bounded on H by Cutoff multipliers through order two and by duality. Thus r↦−iφhv(r) is continuous as an H-valued path and belongs to L1(0,T;H) on the finite interval. Here continuous-path Bochner integrability is supplied by Average convergence for a continuous Banach-valued function, applied with X=H, a=0 and b=T. The retarded forcing hypothesis places its integral in XT, and the homogeneous hypothesis places W(⋅)v0 in XT. Their sum with N(v) is consequently an element of XT. This construction does not require multiplication by i to preserve XT when XT is regarded only as a real space.

Source notes

The frozen article, PDF page 14, is cited for attribution of the definitions of N, hv and T. Their well-definedness above uses the stated mathematical suppliers.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources