Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lemma 3.8: energy-data time-integrable supremum bound

PDF p. 15: Lemma 3.8; (3.19)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and hypothesis (H): Ω=Rn∖Θ is the connected exterior of a nonempty compact obstacle with smooth boundary, and the obstacle is non-trapping, meaning that every complete admissible generalized ray x:R→Ω‾, parametrized at unit speed and including reflected and glancing behavior, leaves every compact set in finite forward time. Let n∈{2,3}, T>0, and W(t)=eitΔD, where ΔD is the Dirichlet Laplacian. Take p=4 if n=3, and any finite p>2 if n=2. Then there is a constant C, depending on the fixed domain, T and p, such that every u0∈H01(Ω) satisfies ∥W(⋅)u0∥Lp(0,T;L∞(Ω))≤C∥u0∥H01(Ω). Here H01 is the H1-norm closure of smooth compactly supported functions, with the inherited H1 norm. The displayed time-space norm is the Bochner norm; in particular the evolution has a strongly measurable L∞(Ω)-valued representative on (0,T).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The assumptions, exponents and datum in the Statement.

[F1]

The geometry and non-trapping convention are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains and Non-trapping obstacle. The Dirichlet spectral scale and W(t) are fixed by Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality, under The Axiom of Choice. The integer Sobolev closure and inherited norm are specified by Complex integer-order Sobolev notation.

[F2]

Two-dimensional exponents removing the Strichartz loss gives the displayed Bochner estimate directly in dimension two for every finite p>2. In dimension three, Three-dimensional L4 time Linfinity space estimate gives the same estimate for the scalar sectionwise Lt4Lx∞ norm, without asserting strong measurability into L∞.

[F3]

The spectral core D((I−ΔD)∞) is dense in HD1 by Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality. Low-order identifications of the Dirichlet scale identifies HD1 with H01 and HD2 with H2∩H01, with equivalent norms. Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution gives continuity of W(t) on each scale and unitarity on L2.

[F4]

In dimensions two and three, Uniform localized H2 algebra on a smooth exterior domain gives the continuous embedding H2(Ω)→L∞(Ω). The Bochner and scalar sectionwise conventions are those of Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces; Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability supplies the needed passage between product-null sets and almost-everywhere null sections.

[F5]

Hölder's inequality for real measurable functions, including the strict conjugate pair (4,4/3), is supplied by Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases. Fatou's lemma for nonnegative measurable functions is supplied by Fatou's lemma.

[F6]

Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous makes every continuous map from a compact metric space into any metric space uniformly continuous. The time-space supplier in F4 records compactness of [0,T], as well as completeness of complex Lq for 1≤q≤∞ and the finite-range simple-function definition of strong measurability. In particular its Banach-space assertion applies to L∞(Ω;C) under the assumed Choice.

Proof

Given: The domain, time, exponent and energy datum in the Statement, with the Axiom of Choice.

Goal: Establish the Bochner estimate in both dimensions.

1.1givenF1F2

If n=2, the hypotheses, exponent range, evolution and inherited H1 norm agree with the two-dimensional estimate in F2. It gives the required Bochner bound directly.

1.2givenF1F3F4choose

Suppose n=3. By density in F3 and the Axiom of Choice in F1, choose core data uj with ∥uj−u0∥H01≤2−j for j≥1. Then ∑j≥1∥uj+1−uj∥H01<∞. Each uj lies in HD2; F3 and F4 therefore make gj(t)=W(t)uj continuous from [0,T] into L∞(Ω;C).

2.1F4F6step 1.2construct

For any continuous h:[0,T]→L∞(Ω;C) and ε>0, F6 gives a δ>0 such that ∣t−r∣<δ implies ∥h(t)−h(r)∥∞<ε. Take an integer m with T/m<δ, and set S(t)=h(kT/m) for kT/m≤t<(k+1)T/m, restricted to (0,T), for 0≤k<m. This is a measurable finite-range simple function and sup⁡0<t<T∥S(t)−h(t)∥∞<ε. For fixed h, choosing ε=2−k gives simple approximants converging in norm at every time, so h is strongly measurable by F4. Apply the construction to each gj with ε=2−j and denote the resulting simple map by sj.

3.1F2F4F5F6step 1.2step 2.1

Put aj(t)=∥gj+1(t)−gj(t)∥∞. These are continuous nonnegative real functions. The scalar estimate in F2, with the representative convention in F4, gives ∥aj∥L4(0,T)≤C∥uj+1−uj∥H01. Hölder in F5, applied to aj and the constant function 1 with conjugate exponents (4,4/3), gives ∫0Taj(t) dt≤T3/4∥aj∥L4(0,T). Consequently Tonelli in F4, for Lebesgue time measure and counting measure on the positive integers, gives ∫0T∑j≥1aj(t) dt=∑j≥1∫0Taj(t) dt<∞. Thus the sum is finite outside a measurable null set E. At every t∉E, the norm triangle inequality makes (gj(t)) Cauchy in complex L∞, whose completeness is supplied in F6. Let v(t) be its norm limit there and set v(t)=0 on E.

4.1F4step 2.1step 3.1

The finite-range simple functions in step 2.1 satisfy ∥sj(t)−v(t)∥∞≤2−j+∥gj(t)−v(t)∥∞→0 for every t∉E. They therefore witness strong measurability of v directly by the definition in F4, without assuming a general closure theorem for maps into a nonseparable Banach space.

5.1F3F4step 3.1step 4.1

Unitarity on L2 makes W(t)uj→W(t)u0 in L2(Ω) for every t. At each t∉E, the same sequence converges to v(t) in L∞(Ω) and hence in L2(Ω∩BR) for every positive integer R, since the local L2 distance is at most ∣Ω∩BR∣1/2 times the L∞ distance. The norm triangle inequality identifies the two local L2 limits. The countable balls cover Ω, so v(t) equals the spatial class of W(t)u0 for almost every time. With the product and section conventions in F4, v is a strongly measurable representative of the evolution.

6.1F2F4F5step 1.1step 1.2step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

The scalar estimate gives ∫0T∥gj(t)∥∞4 dt≤C4∥uj∥H014. The norm convergence outside E in step 3.1 and Fatou's lemma in F5, applied to the nonnegative measurable functions ∥gj(t)∥∞4, give ∫0T∥v(t)∥∞4 dt≤C4∥u0∥H014, because uj→u0 in H01. Taking fourth roots and using steps 4.1 and 5.1 proves the Bochner bound in dimension three. Together with step 1.1 this proves the assertion in both dimensions.

Source notes

The frozen article is cited for attribution of Lemma 3.8. The dimensional estimates used as mathematical premises are supplied by the declared items. The three-dimensional argument records the strong-measurability passage using explicit finite-range simple approximants; the scalar mixed-norm supplier is not treated as asserting Bochner measurability. Complex L-infinity completeness was already supplied by the declared time-space item. The mathematical flow chain retains its Physics Library supplier with domain mathematics. No physical assumption, new external input, or original-article defect is asserted.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources