Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniform localized H2 algebra on a smooth exterior domain

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n∈{2,3} and let Ω=Rn∖Θ be connected, where Θ is compact and has smooth boundary in the local graph sense. Let H2(Ω)=W2,2(Ω;C), with norm given by the square root of the sum of the squared L2 norms of all weak derivatives through order two. Then there is a constant C depending on n and the fixed obstacle such that, for all u,v∈H2(Ω), ∥u∥L∞(Ω)≤C∥u∥H2(Ω),∥uv∥H2(Ω)≤C∥u∥H2(Ω)∥v∥H2(Ω).

For m∈{3,5} and λ∈R, put g(z)=λ∣z∣m−1z. There is Cm depending also on m such that ∥g(u)∥H2(Ω)≤Cm∣λ∣∥u∥H2(Ω)m and ∥g(u)−g(v)∥H2(Ω)≤Cm∣λ∣(∥u∥H2(Ω)+∥v∥H2(Ω))m−1∥u−v∥H2(Ω).

The obstacle trace of an H2(Ω) function means the restriction to ∂Θ of its bounded-domain H1 trace on G=Ω∩BR, for any sufficiently large R with Θ⊂BR. Its values are classes in L2(∂Θ,dS;C), where dS is chart-independent surface measure on the compact smooth hypersurface ∂Θ; zero trace means equality to zero dS-almost everywhere. If that trace of u is zero, then the obstacle trace of g(u) is zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the stated smooth compact obstacle and connected exterior, n∈{2,3}, and u,v∈H2(Ω).

Goal: Prove the uniform exterior embedding and multiplication estimates, their polynomial consequences, and preservation of zero obstacle trace.

[F1]

A bounded smooth domain is an H2 extension domain by Bounded Ck domains admit integer-order Sobolev extension. On every bounded H2 extension domain, H2 embeds continuously into bounded continuous functions and is an algebra when n∈{2,3}, since 4>n; see Higher-order Sobolev embedding and The Sobolev space W^k,p is an algebra above the critical index. The same constants work on translates of one fixed ball.

[F2]

Smooth cutoffs with prescribed compact inclusion exist by Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization. Multiplication by a smooth function with bounded derivatives through order two is bounded on H2 by Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor. The H2 norm and weak derivatives are those of Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms.

[F3]

On a bounded C1 domain the H1 trace is bounded, agrees with the boundary values of a representative continuous on the closure, and is defined chartwise; see The Lᵖ trace operator on a bounded C¹ domain. The local graph convention is Bounded Ck domains and boundary charts.

[F4]

For a compact C1 hypersurface, dS is the chartwise surface measure of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, independent of charts and subordinate partitions by Chart and partition independence of surface measure. On the obstacle component of ∂G, its restriction agrees with the measure constructed from the same obstacle charts. An L2 boundary class is zero exactly when a representative is zero dS-almost everywhere, using The space Lᵖ(μ) as the quotient by null functions.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.

Goal: Establish every assertion of the Statement under the stated hypotheses.

Proof technique: Construct a uniformly locally finite bounded-domain cover and sum the local estimates.

1.1F3givenconstruct

Put r=2n and choose R so large that Θ⊂BR−4r. Set G=Ω∩BR and A={a∈Zn:∣a∣≥R−3r}. Each B(a,r) with a∈A misses Θ. The sets G and B(a,r) cover Ω: outside BR−2r a nearest lattice point is at distance at most r/4 and belongs to A, while points inside BR belong to G. Their overlap is bounded by a constant depending only on n, since the lattice points within distance r of any point lie in a fixed-size cube. The boundary of G consists of the separated smooth obstacle boundary and sphere. It is connected: an exterior path from any point of G to a point outside BR, stopped at its first sphere crossing, joins it within G to the connected outer annulus; open connected Euclidean sets are path connected. Thus G is a bounded smooth domain.

2.1F2step 1.1construct

The cover also admits a smooth partition with uniformly bounded derivatives. Choose χ0 equal to one on BR−2r and supported in BR−r. Take a nonnegative smooth bump ρ supported in B(0,r) and positive on B(0,r/2)‾, and set S(x)=∑a∈Aρ(x−a). The preceding nearest-lattice argument gives a positive uniform lower bound for S where 1−χ0 is nonzero. Define χa=(1−χ0)ρ(x−a)/S(x) there and extend it by zero elsewhere. The locally finite sum is χ0+∑aχa=1 on Ω; finite overlap, the lower bound for S, and the fixed bump give uniform bounds on derivatives through order two. Hence the associated localized H2 norms are controlled by bounded overlap and the weak cutoff rule.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1

Restrict u and v to G and to each exterior ball. By [F1], the local algebra and embedding constants are bounded by one fixed constant: use the constant for G and the translation-invariant constant for B(0,r). If Dj denotes these domains and aj=∥u∥H2(Dj), bj=∥v∥H2(Dj), bounded overlap gives ∑jaj2≤N∥u∥H2(Ω)2 and sup⁡jbj≤∥v∥H2(Ω). Local weak derivatives agree on overlaps, so the local products define the global weak derivatives. Consequently ∥uv∥H2(Ω)2≤C2∑jaj2bj2≤C2N∥u∥H2(Ω)2∥v∥H2(Ω)2. The local supremum estimates and the cover likewise give ∥u∥L∞(Ω)≤C∥u∥H2(Ω).

4.1F2step 3.1algebra

Complex conjugation commutes with real weak differentiation, as follows by conjugating the test-function identities, and preserves the H2 norm. Since m is odd, g(u)=λu(m+1)/2u‾(m−1)/2. Repeated multiplication gives the stated power bound. Replacing the factors one at a time in the difference of the two products gives a sum of m products, each containing either u−v or its conjugate and m−1 factors chosen from u,v and their conjugates; the same algebra estimate proves the stated Lipschitz bound.

5.1F1F3F4step 4.1∎

By [F1], u∣G has a continuous representative on G‾; the same is true of g(u)∣G, whose representative is the polynomial applied to that of u. By [F3] and [F4], their obstacle traces are the corresponding boundary values as L2(∂Θ,dS;C) classes. If the trace of u vanishes dS-almost everywhere, then g(0)=0 shows that the trace of g(u) does also. The chartwise trace is local, so enlarging R does not change its restriction to ∂Θ. This proves all assertions.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.