How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Critical nonlinearities named in the article
PDF p. 5: paragraph after Corollary 1.6; PDF p. 21: §5.2(B)–(C)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. The article calls the quintic nonlinearity energy-critical in dimension three at regularity , and the cubic nonlinearity mass-critical in dimension two at the level. These names refer to the scaling of the unforced power Schrödinger equation: mass-critical means its scaling preserves the spatial norm, and energy-critical here means that it preserves the spatial norm of the gradient, the homogeneous first-order energy-space seminorm. The scaling also dilates the exterior domain; it is not generally a symmetry of one fixed obstacle or of its controlled equation.
For an open spatial set and a smooth complex-valued function on , use Lebesgue measure and . The spatial norm is , on almost-everywhere classes when finite. Define the complex gradient componentwise by . Its Euclidean length is , and when finite. The criticality calculation uses these norms for sufficiently smooth solutions with finite displayed norms, at corresponding times on the dilated domains.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The internal system uses , with for cubic and for quintic; its exterior domain is . Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems
The Axiom of Choice gives countable choice: a choice function on the family of sets in a sequence selects an element for each index. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
The Euclidean chain rule applies to the real and imaginary components of a smooth complex-valued function and to their derivatives. The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)
Under countable choice, change of variables for a diffeomorphism applies to nonnegative measurable integrands on open sets, with the absolute Jacobian determinant. A C¹ diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
The complex convention is for finite integral, using complex modulus and almost-everywhere classes. Complex classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
The real scalar gradient is the vector of spatial partial derivatives; applying it to the real and imaginary components defines . The squared length used here is . The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case Complex classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
Proof
[F1] The internal system uses , with for cubic and for quintic; its exterior domain is . Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems
[F2] The Axiom of Choice gives countable choice: a choice function on the family of sets in a sequence selects an element for each index. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
[F3] The Euclidean chain rule applies to the real and imaginary components of a smooth complex-valued function and to their derivatives. The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)
[F4] Under countable choice, change of variables for a diffeomorphism applies to nonnegative measurable integrands on open sets, with the absolute Jacobian determinant. A C¹ diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
Given: The equations and dimensions in the statement, with , and a sufficiently smooth solution whose displayed spatial norms are finite. Let and set , , and .
Goal: Identify the two scaling-invariant norms and explain the domain qualification.
By the chain rule, both and are times the corresponding derivative of evaluated at , while is times the original nonlinearity there. Since , the unforced equation is preserved on the scaled space-time domain. A zero Dirichlet boundary value is carried from to when the boundary values are meaningful.
At corresponding times, apply change of variables on and use the chain rule for the gradient. This gives and . For , , so the first exponent is zero when . For , , so the second exponent is zero when . These are respectively the mass-critical and energy-critical classifications defined above. Since , a fixed obstacle and its control cutoff are generally changed by the dilation; no fixed-domain control or well-posedness conclusion follows from this calculation.
Source notes
The article is cited for its two classifications and their context, at the paragraph after Corollary 1.6 and §5.2(B)–(C). The calculation above is a local explanation of the scaling terminology; the article citation is attribution rather than a premise of the calculation. The terms mass and energy name mathematical norms here and do not assert an experimental measurement.
Depends on
- Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
- The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)
- A C¹ diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.