How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Asymptotically flat spacelike end and derivative decay
Definition
Let be a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold of signature . An end chart consists, for a specified , of a spacelike embedded hypersurface without manifold boundary and a specified diffeomorphism from the open exterior onto . A finite-radius boundary sphere, if supplied as additional data, is omitted from this chart. All estimates concern and are unchanged on restriction to for any . Let be its unique smooth future unit normal, its induced metric, and its second fundamental form, with the tangential covariant derivative defined independently of smooth local extensions. The sign of is fixed here; reversing it does not change the decay condition.
For a scalar chart component and integer , write if for each multi-index with there are such that for . Here ; tensor estimates apply componentwise in this specified chart. Call these end data asymptotically flat when, for some and integer , and , for . The chart and parameters are witnesses to this existential condition; no invariance under arbitrary changes of chart is asserted.
Definition references
Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model
Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons
Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class
The future unit normal, induced metric and second fundamental form of a spacelike hypersurface
Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds
Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆ℝᵐ→ℝⁿ
Facts & Assumptions
The metric, spacelike induced geometry and metric-selected connection have their library meanings. Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class
On a spacelike embedded hypersurface without boundary, the future unit normal is unique and smooth, its tangential covariant derivative is independent of local extensions, and the induced metric and second fundamental form are smooth. The supplier uses , so the convention here is . The future unit normal, induced metric and second fundamental form of a spacelike hypersurface
A diffeomorphism between smooth manifolds is a bijective smooth map with smooth inverse. Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds
For a scalar function on an open subset of , is the directional derivative along the th standard basis vector, defined by the derivative at of when it exists. Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆ℝᵐ→ℝⁿ
Justification
Given: The objects and specified data in the Definition.
Goal: Verify that the displayed conditions define unambiguous objects and predicates on these data.
1.1 The open exterior chart and the spacelike embedded hypersurface satisfy the boundaryless hypotheses of [F2]. That supplier gives the unique smooth normal and extension-independent tangential covariant derivative. It also gives smooth induced metric and second fundamental form; taking preserves smoothness. By [F3] the inverse of the specified diffeomorphism is a smooth coordinate chart on . Thus and are well-defined smooth scalar functions in this chart and admit all the iterated coordinate partial derivatives of [F4] used below. [F1, F2, F3, F4]
2.1 For each of finitely many derivatives at each fixed , the displayed inequality is a definite bound on a scalar function outside a sufficiently large ball. Quantifying over their constants, and then over and , gives the claimed predicate. Replacing by leaves every absolute value unchanged. Restricting to preserves the bounds after increasing each threshold radius above ; conversely, bounds on that restricted chart already give the required bounds for all sufficiently large in the original chart. Hence omitting a separately supplied finite-radius boundary sphere has no effect on this decay predicate. [F1, F2, F4, step 1.1] ∎
Depends on
- Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model
- Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons
- Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class
- The future unit normal, induced metric and second fundamental form of a spacelike hypersurface
- Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds
- Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆ℝᵐ→ℝⁿ
Used by · 7
- Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
- Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses
- Physical expectation of late-time stationarity
- Complete stationary flow and its exterior region
- Null generators and once-only cross-sections
- Acausal hypersurface with compact core and finitely many ends
- Normalized Komar data on a nonrotating horizon section
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.