How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Comparison spheres and their stationary cylinders
PDF p. 21: Proposition 4.1 definition; PDF p. 22: Proposition 4.1 and notation after (4.2); PDF p. 23: notation after (4.2)
Definition
Let stationary Lorentzian data and an original Cartesian exterior end be supplied as in Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions and Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator. More specifically, suppose the spacetime end is supplied with a diffeomorphism from onto its image, where for some , the corresponding coordinates are , and the stationary field is there. Set , using the Cartesian-radius convention of Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity. The flow of on this end is consequently .
Fix , to be chosen sufficiently large when further geometric estimates require it. For every , define the comparison sphere At a fixed , write , , and . Here is called the stationary cylinder of ; this name alone does not assert that it is timelike. The phrase that the spheres move to infinity more slowly than the scale means precisely that their radii satisfy and as .
Facts & Assumptions
Stationary Lorentzian data include the smooth vector field ; the product end and the equation are additional supplied coordinate data. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
The original end has a Cartesian radius ; the mass-one convention and the existence of its mass limit, when used, are separate assumptions. Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
A smooth embedded two-dimensional submanifold is characterized by local smooth slice charts in which it is a coordinate two-plane. Embedded submanifolds and slice charts
A smooth vector field on a smooth manifold has a unique maximal integral curve through each specified initial point. Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve
Justification
**Given:**The product end, , and in the Definition.
Goal: Justify the coordinate sets, their translated union, and the stated scale comparison.
1.1 Since , the radius exceeds . The set is a smooth embedded two-sphere: near each point one nonzero coordinate can be solved as , giving smooth local graphs, and radial scaling identifies it with the unit sphere. The supplied product diffeomorphism carries this sphere at into the spacetime end. [given, F2, F3]
2.1 The curve has velocity and is defined for every real in the supplied product end. By uniqueness of the maximal integral curve through , these globally defined curves are the stationary flow trajectories. Thus and there. Finally while as . [given, F1, F4, step 1.1, algebra] ∎
The article supplies attribution for the definition and the scale choice. Spacelikeness, timelikeness, expansion, and transformed area require additional metric hypotheses and estimates; they are not consequences of this coordinate definition alone.
Source notes
The article supplies attribution for the definition and the scale choice. Spacelikeness, timelikeness, expansion, and transformed area require additional metric hypotheses and estimates; they are not consequences of this coordinate definition alone.
Depends on
Used by · 11
- Compact remainder, causal cut and generator endpoint map
- Proposition 4.1: positive-expansion spheres of limiting area 4π
- Eventual chronological access to translated comparison spheres
- Lemma 4.2: null generators of the causal past boundary
- Lemma 4.3: localization of the causal cut near S
- Closed generator set and nonintersection before the cut
- Lemma 4.4: smooth compact comparison region
- Divergence comparison between S and the translated causal cut
- Theorem 4.1: limiting horizon area upper bound
- Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation
- First cylinder contact, outward source branch and the focusing contradiction
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- The uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes · PDF pp. 21–23, Proposition 4.1 and notation after (4.2)