Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inaccessible set is the closure of its relative interior

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let E=R×C be a smooth time-oriented stationary Lorentz manifold with complete time-translation Killing field T=∂t. Suppose the slices are spacelike and T=Nn+X with stationary extensions of their unit future normal n, lapse N>0 and shift X. Suppose −X has a complete flow ψs on C. Let U⊂E be a time-translation-invariant open set, P=IE−(U), and B={x∈C:(0,x)∉P}. Then B is relatively closed in C, and ψs(B)⊂int⁡CB for every s>0. In particular B=int⁡CB‾ C.

Here a Killing field means a smooth field with LTg=0. The chronological relation p≪q means reachability inside E by a locally absolutely continuous curve with future timelike tangent almost everywhere, and IE−(S)={p∈E:∃q∈S, p≪q}. These conventions apply in arbitrary finite dimension; the four-dimensional case is included.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, as in the lapse–shift supplier's convention. It implies Dependent Choice and Countable Choice, meeting the foundational hypotheses of the four-dimensional causal suppliers. The Axiom of Choice AC implies DC implies countable choice

[F1]

Chronology is transitive and chronological futures and pasts are open. The dimension-general inputs are recorded in External input below. In dimension four the existing mathematical interfaces also supply these facts with the choice assumptions in [A1]. Causal curves, chronological and causal reachability, and inextendibility Openness of the chronological future and past, openness of the chronological relation, and closure of future and past sets Push-up rule

[F2]

The unit future normal satisfies g(n,n)=−1 and is orthogonal to the slice. The given decomposition yields N=−g(T,n) and X=T−Nn tangent to the slice. These are the lapse–shift formulas of the four-dimensional interface, and their displayed algebra is dimension independent. Complete smooth flows are smooth and satisfy the flow law. Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data Local and global flows generated by a vector field

[F3]

The Lie derivative is defined by differentiation of pullback along a flow; vanishing Lie derivative implies tensor invariance on each common flow domain. This applies to a Lorentzian metric as a smooth covariant two-tensor in any dimension. The inline Killing-field convention agrees in dimension four with the Lorentzian definition. The Lie derivative of a tensor field A tensor field is flow-invariant exactly when its Lie derivative vanishes Killing fields of a Lorentzian metric

[F5]

Smooth manifolds carry their smooth structures given by maximal smooth atlases. The product E=R×C carries the product topology and canonical product smooth structure: product charts pair the standard real coordinate with a smooth chart on C. Basic product-open sets are rectangles, and product projections are continuous. Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts The product set ∏_i ∈ I Xᵢ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure

[F6]

A smooth Lorentz metric is a smooth symmetric nondegenerate covariant two-tensor of signature (−,+,…,+). Its timelike vectors satisfy g(v,v)<0 and form two open cone components. A time orientation continuously chooses one as future, with the other past. These dimension-general geometric inputs are recorded in External input below. In dimension four they agree with the existing mathematical geometry definition and cone lemma. Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model The timelike set has exactly two convex components, described in orthonormal coordinates

External input

The imported chronology input Chruściel, §§2.3–2.4 supplies [F1] for locally Lipschitz paths in arbitrary finite dimension. The parametrization input Minguzzi, Remark 2.8 connects it to the curve convention in the Statement. The geometric input Minguzzi, §§1.2–1.3, 1.5 and 1.7 supplies the dimension-general Lorentzian and time-orientation conventions and two-cone description in [F6]. Exact claims, hypotheses and consulted passages are recorded in the three source references. The inaccessible-set conclusion is proved locally below.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the Statement.

Goal: Prove relative closedness, the forward interior inclusion and the closure identity.

1.1givenA1F1

Under [A1], use the dimension-general inputs in External input as follows. A curve with future timelike tangent almost everywhere is a causal absolutely continuous curve, so Minguzzi's arclength reparametrization applies. Its tangent is a positive multiple of the old tangent almost everywhere, hence remains future timelike. Conversely a locally Lipschitz timelike path is locally absolutely continuous. Thus the two conventions give the same chronological relation, and Chruściel's transitivity and openness apply to it. In dimension four the existing causal suppliers give the same conclusions with their choice hypotheses satisfied.

1.2givenF2F5F6

For x∈B consider γx(s)=(s,ψsx). Completeness keeps ψsx in C at every finite parameter. The flow equation for −X and stationarity give γx′=T−X=Nn. Therefore g(γx′,γx′)=−N2<0 and γx′ is future directed. On each finite parameter interval the image is compact and the continuous lapse has a positive minimum, though no global uniform lower bound is required. In particular (0,x)≪(s,ψsx) for every s>0.

2.1givenF3F4F5F6step 1.1

Write Φa(t,x)=(t+a,x) for the complete flow of T. Since LTg=0, tensor-flow invariance gives Φa∗g=g for every a. By [F6], these isometries preserve time orientation: for a future timelike vector v, dΦa(v) remains timelike as a varies continuously from zero, so cannot cross to the other component of the timelike cones. Applying Φa and Φ−a to timelike curves, and using Φa(U)=U, gives Φa(P)=P and Φa(A)=A for A=E∖P. Openness of P makes A closed. The product identification ιt:C→{t}×C, ιt(x)=(t,x), is a homeomorphism onto the slice with its subspace topology: its inverse is the restricted product projection. Hence B=ι0−1(A) is closed in C. Finally, if a∈A and a≪b∈P, there is u∈U with b≪u; transitivity gives a≪u, a contradiction. Thus IE+(a)⊂A for a∈A.

3.1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

By step 2.1, the open set IE+((0,x)) is contained in A. For s>0, its intersection with the slice t=s contains (s,ψsx) by step 1.2 and is relatively open. Pulling that intersection back by ιs, or equivalently translating by −s and using ι0, gives an open neighborhood of ψsx contained in B, by translation invariance of A. Thus ψs(B)⊂int⁡CB. For x∈B, smoothness of the flow gives ψsx→x as s↓0. Every neighborhood of x therefore meets int⁡CB, so x belongs to its closure: indeed no closed superset of that interior can omit x, since its open complement would then be such a neighborhood. This proves B⊂int⁡CB‾ C. Closedness of B gives the reverse inclusion.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

P. T. Chruściel, Elements of causality theory · §§2.1, 2.3–2.4; Definition 2.1.1, printed p. 4; curve convention p. 16; futures/pasts p. 17; Proposition 2.4.2(3), p. 18; Corollary 2.4.11 and Proposition 2.4.12, pp. 24–25 (PDF pp. 7, 19–21, 27–28).

Chronology defined using locally Lipschitz future timelike paths is transitive; I^+(S) and I^-(S) are open for every subset S.

Hypotheses: Time-oriented finite-dimensional Lorentzian manifold with C^2 metric; standard manifold conventions. Applied here to smooth E, in the stated ZFC setting.

Reading limits: Consulted the listed definitions, statements and accompanying arguments in the online PDF dated 27 November 2024. Imports only chronology and openness; no choice-minimality claim.

E. Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory, Living Reviews in Relativity 22 (2019), article 3 · §1.2, p. 6 (dimension convention); §2.3, Remark 2.8, p. 28 (PDF pp. 6, 28).

A future causal absolutely continuous curve admits a Lipschitz arclength reparametrization, with tangent positively rescaled almost everywhere.

Hypotheses: Time-oriented finite-dimensional C^2 Lorentzian manifold, causal nonzero tangent almost everywhere, compact parameter interval, auxiliary Riemannian metric; ZFC used here.

Reading limits: Read §1.2 and §2.3 including Remark 2.8. Use only the stated parametrization and tangent formula; preservation of timelikeness under positive scaling is the local application in Proof 1.1.

E. Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory, Living Reviews in Relativity 22 (2019), article 3 — Lorentzian geometry and time orientation · §1.2, printed p. 6 (dimension and signature); §1.3, printed p. 7 (Lorentz scalar product, timelike cones and choice of future); §1.5, printed p. 9 (Lorentzian manifold); §1.7, printed pp. 10–11 (continuous time orientation). PDF pp. 6–7, 9–11.

In finite dimension, a Lorentz scalar product has signature (-,+,...,+); its timelike vectors form two disjoint open cones, distinguished in orthonormal coordinates by the sign of the time coordinate. A Lorentzian manifold is a smooth manifold equipped with a C^2 metric of that signature. A time orientation is a continuous choice of the future cone at each point, equivalently specified by a continuous timelike field. The other cone is past.

Hypotheses: Finite-dimensional real tangent spaces with one negative direction; smooth Hausdorff second-countable manifold without boundary and a C^2 Lorentzian metric. Time orientation is assumed given, not asserted to exist for every Lorentzian manifold. Applied here to the stipulated smooth g and future normal n; no connectedness or noncompactness assumption from Definition 1.6 is imported.

Reading limits: Read the extracted online PDF text of §§1.2–1.3, the Lorentzian-manifold definition in §1.5, and the time-orientation definitions at the start and end of §1.7. Imports only these geometric definitions and the displayed two-cone description, not the covering construction, existence theorems or any physical model.

Sources