How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An open chronological exterior is causally convex without a timelike-end assumption
Statement
For any open subset of a smooth time-oriented spacetime put . Then , and any ambient causal segment with endpoints in is contained in . If is chronologically before some in a specified open far tail , a future timelike path from to can be replaced, with the same endpoints, by finitely many smooth future timelike geodesic pieces inside . This lemma does not prove the existence of such a for every .
Statement references
Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
Causal curves, chronological and causal reachability, and inextendibility
The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection
Chart independence, concatenation, reparametrization and transitivity for causal curves
Facts & Assumptions
Chronology, the causal exterior and causal curves have the stated meanings; timelike--causal concatenation obeys push-up, and chronological futures and pasts are open. Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data Causal curves, chronological and causal reachability, and inextendibility Push-up rule Openness of the chronological future and past, openness of the chronological relation, and closure of future and past sets
Local smooth geodesics and their exponential maps exist. Every point in an open neighborhood has a strictly convex normal neighborhood that is normal at every one of its points, with a unique contained geodesic between each pair of points. For every , the cone theorem gives ; thus endpoints chronologically related by a timelike curve in are joined by the smooth future timelike radial geodesic in . The fixed-base ball lemma also records this cone characterization at its specified base point. The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection Existence of strictly convex normal neighborhoods: small coordinate balls are normal neighborhoods of each of their points Local causality in a convex normal ball: causal reachability is the exponential cone, the Lorentzian length is bounded by the displacement radius, and null endpoints force the null geodesic Pointwise local causality: closed cones, openness of the local chronological future, no local closed causal curves, corner smoothing and closedness of the local causal relation
A closed bounded real interval is compact by Heine--Borel. Every relatively open cover of that interval has a finite subcover and a Lebesgue number : every nonempty subset of diameter less than lies in one cover member. Heine-Borel in ℝⁿ: with the Euclidean metric a subset of ℝⁿ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a δ > 0 such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than δ lies inside a single member of the cover
Restrictions to nondegenerate compact subintervals preserve local absolute continuity and the almost-everywhere timelike or causal velocity condition directly from the curve definition. Increasing affine reparametrizations preserve these curve classes, and finite concatenations of smooth future timelike pieces are future timelike curves. Causal curves, chronological and causal reachability, and inextendibility Chart independence, concatenation, reparametrization and transitivity for causal curves
Work in ZFC. AC implies Dependent Choice and Countable Choice, supplying the inherited choice hypotheses of the causal results in [F1], [F2] and [F4]. The Axiom of Choice AC implies DC implies countable choice
Proof
Given: The stated data and explicit hypotheses.
Goal: Establish the stated causal convexity and conditional geodesic replacement.
Every point of the open set has a short future and past timelike segment remaining in , by local geodesic existence in [F2], so it lies in . If a causal segment has endpoints and passes through , its restrictions give , including equality at the endpoints. Choose and with . Push-up gives , so . Also are unions of open pointwise chronological futures or pasts, so is open. This proves causal convexity without a timelike stationary-field assumption on .
Under the explicit accessibility hypothesis choose a future timelike curve , , with endpoints and . Both endpoints lie in by step 1.1, so its entire image lies in . Since is open, [F2] supplies a cover of this image by strictly convex normal neighborhoods . The inverse images form a relatively open cover of , because is continuous. By [F3] take a finite subcover and a Lebesgue number for that subcover on the compact metric interval . Choose a finite partition of mesh less than . Each then lies in some , so .
The restriction of to , affinely reparametrized to , is future timelike in by [F4]. Its endpoints are therefore chronologically related in , not merely in the ambient spacetime. Apply the cone theorem of [F2] with base point , which is legitimate because is normal at every one of its points. The inverse-exponential displacement to is future timelike, and the radial geodesic is smooth, future timelike and contained in . Replace each restricted curve by this geodesic and affinely parametrize it on .
The finitely many geodesic pieces have matching endpoints. Their concatenation is a future timelike curve by [F4], is smooth on each piece, stays in and has the original endpoints . This establishes the asserted conditional replacement. No access to the far tail was inferred merely from access to .
Depends on
- Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
- Causal curves, chronological and causal reachability, and inextendibility
- The push-up rule: p << q and q <= r imply p << r, together with the timelike-piece criterion
- Openness of the chronological future and past, openness of the chronological relation, and closure of future and past sets
- Pointwise local causality: closed cones, openness of the local chronological future, no local closed causal curves, corner smoothing and closedness of the local causal relation
- The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection
- The Axiom of Choice
- Existence of strictly convex normal neighborhoods: small coordinate balls are normal neighborhoods of each of their points
- Local causality in a convex normal ball: causal reachability is the exponential cone, the Lorentzian length is bounded by the displacement radius, and null endpoints force the null geodesic
- Heine-Borel in ℝⁿ: with the Euclidean metric a subset of ℝⁿ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a δ > 0 such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than δ lies inside a single member of the cover
- Chart independence, concatenation, reparametrization and transitivity for causal curves
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.