How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Outward unit variation in the normalized null basis
Statement
In the normal plane of the surface data Surface measure, flux densities and null normal gauge, let , and . Then , , with , and the accompanying normal is . The future normal is timelike unit and is spacelike unit, with .
Facts & Assumptions
The supplied surface gauge fixes the orthonormal normal pair and its null combinations. Surface measure, flux densities and null normal gauge
Proof
Given: The data and explicit hypotheses of the Statement.
Goal: Establish its identities with the indicated normalizations.
Expand the pairings using , and ; they give and .
The identity equals exactly for . Substituting this value in gives .
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Andersson–Mars–Simon, Stability of marginally outer trapped surfaces and existence of marginally outer trapped tubes · Sections 2–3, printed pages 5–8