Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Constant combinations preserve horizon symmetries and normalize periods

Statement

Assume ACω for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure. Let (M,g,N) be an oriented time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold of signature (−,+,+,+), and let U⊆M be open, with the restricted metric, orientation and time orientation. Let T,K be smooth Killing fields for this same metric g∣U, with [T,K]=0, where the bracket is the Lie bracket. For real constants a,b, the field Z=aT+bK is Killing for g∣U and satisfies [T,Z]=[K,Z]=0.

For any local flow ϕ:D→U of Z, where D⊆R×U, and any real constant c≠0, define Dc={(t,p):(ct,p)∈D}. Then ψ:Dc→U, ψ(t,p)=ϕ(ct,p), is a local flow of cZ. If ϕ is global on U and has least positive common period P, then Z^=(P/(2π))Z has a global flow on U with least positive common period 2π. Here a common period P>0 means ϕ(s+P,p)=ϕ(s,p) for every s∈R and p∈U; least means that no q∈(0,P) has this property. This concerns the whole flow, allowing fixed points and individual orbits of shorter period.

If Z=T+λK with real constant λ≠0, then K=(Z−T)/λ; this is a scale relation, not a universal normalization fixing the coefficient of T in K.

Statement references

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The Lorentzian metric and time orientation are the geometric data of the Lorentzian-manifold definition, and the orientation restricts from M to U. Both fields are Killing for the single restricted metric. Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model Oriented smooth manifolds and oriented charts Killing fields of a Lorentzian metric

[F2]

On an oriented time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold, clause (a) of the Killing-characterization theorem gives LXg=0 if and only if ∇iXj+∇jXi=0, where indices are lowered using g and ∇ is its metric-selected connection. The same characterization applies on the open manifold U. Killing fields and conserved currents, and on-shell conservation of the Hilbert stress-energy tensor

[F3]

The Lie bracket is the commutator [X,Y]f=X(Yf)−Y(Xf) on smooth functions; this formula gives bilinearity over real constants and skew symmetry. The Lie bracket of smooth vector fields

[F4]

A local flow has an open domain containing {0}×U, interval time fibres, the identity at time zero, integral-curve time maps and the flow law whenever both sides are defined. An integral curve γ of X satisfies γ′(t)=Xγ(t). The flow is global when its domain is R×U. Local and global flows generated by a vector field Integral curves of a vector field

[F5]

The differential chain rule for smooth maps gives ddtγ(ct)=cγ′(ct) for a smooth curve γ and a real constant c, on the reparametrized interval. The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps

[F6]

The least common period convention is that of a normalized periodic action: it concerns the entire global flow, rather than requiring every orbit to have the same least period. Only this period convention is used here, not the normal-averaging construction. Periodic isometries and invariant normal averaging

[F7]

The tensor-derivative theorem applies to a smooth symmetric nondegenerate metric on a smooth four-manifold without boundary, assuming ACω for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure. It applies to g∣U because the restricted Lorentzian metric is smooth and nondegenerate and U is an open four-manifold without boundary. Clause (c), specialized to a smooth covector ω, gives ∇iωj=∂iωj−∑dΓdjiωd, where d runs over the four chart indices. This formula is linear in ω over real constants; its finite expansion uses no additional choice. Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω) Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model

[F8]

Under the stated ACω convention, a smooth vector field on U is a smooth section of TU→U. On each smooth chart, a vector field is smooth exactly when its coordinate components are smooth functions; this tests smoothness of the section in the induced tangent-bundle charts. A smooth vector field is a smooth section of the tangent bundle Smoothness of a vector field is equivalent to smooth coordinate components

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the Killing, commutation, local-flow rescaling and period conclusions, and the final scale relation.

1.1givenF1F2F7F8algebra

For any real constants r,s, the pointwise combination rT+sK takes its value at p in TpU. In every smooth chart on U, its components are rTi+sKi. The components Ti,Ki are smooth by [F8], and every iterated partial derivative of rTi+sKi is the same constant combination of the corresponding derivatives of Ti,Ki, hence is continuous. Thus [F8] makes rT+sK a smooth section on each chart and therefore on U. In particular Z=aT+bK and cZ=(ca)T+(cb)K are smooth. Now write Tj=gjkTk, Kj=gjkKk and Zj=aTj+bKj. The covector component formula in [F7] gives ∇iZj=a∇iTj+b∇iKj because a,b are real constants. Hence ∇iZj+∇jZi=a(∇iTj+∇jTi)+b(∇iKj+∇jKi)=0, since T,K are Killing. The characterization in [F2] therefore gives LZg=0 for the same restricted metric.

2.1givenF3step 1.1algebra

The commutator formula gives [T,T]=[K,K]=0 and [K,T]=−[T,K]=0. Consequently [T,Z]=a[T,T]+b[T,K]=0 and [K,Z]=a[K,T]+b[K,K]=0.

2.2givenF4F5step 1.1algebra

The map (t,p)↦(ct,p) is a smooth invertible linear change of the time coordinate, so Dc is open, contains {0}×U, and has interval time fibres {t:ct∈Dp}. The map ψ(t,p)=ϕ(ct,p) is smooth and satisfies ψ(0,p)=p. By the integral-curve equation and the chain rule, ∂tψ(t,p)=cZϕ(ct,p)=(cZ)ψ(t,p). Whenever both sides are defined, the original flow law gives ψ(t,ψ(s,p))=ϕ(ct,ϕ(cs,p))=ϕ(c(t+s),p)=ψ(t+s,p). Thus all defining local-flow conditions hold on the stated domain. If D=R×U, then Dc=R×U.

3.1givenF4F6step 2.2algebra

For the period conclusion take c=P/(2π)>0 in step 2.2. A positive number q is a common period of ψ precisely when ϕ(cs+cq,p)=ϕ(cs,p) for all s∈R and p∈U. Since cR=R, this is equivalent to cq being a common period of ϕ. In particular q=2π is a common period, while 0<q<2π would give a forbidden common period 0<cq<P of ϕ. Hence 2π is least, in the whole-flow sense of [F6].

4.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Finally Z=T+λK implies λK=Z−T, so K=(Z−T)/λ when λ≠0. Under the separate period rescaling the relation becomes Z^=cT+cλK, which need not retain coefficient 1 on T. Thus normalizing the period of Z does not prescribe the scale of K in a combination with fixed coefficient on T. This proves all claims.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.