How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The nonrotating bifurcation gives positive normalized mass before staticity
Statement
Under the regular vacuum assumptions and , the mass parameter in is positive. More precisely, for the future horizon generated by the asymptotically normalized stationary field, This conclusion is obtained on the original complete-up-to-boundary section, before any maximal-slice or staticity theorem is used.
Statement references
The exterior Cauchy component has a complete asymptotically Euclidean closure
Stationary end access and future orientation need no maximal slice
A working partial-Cauchy collar satisfies the source GR section equalities
Zero stationary field gives the local bifurcate Killing-horizon and boundary data
Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization
Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
Facts & Assumptions
The complete-up-to-boundary section and its end, the future orientation of timelike in , the working partial-Cauchy collar, and the local bifurcate Killing horizon with its nonzero normal boost and affine-generator law are supplied by The exterior Cauchy component has a complete asymptotically Euclidean closure, Stationary end access and future orientation need no maximal slice, A working partial-Cauchy collar satisfies the source GR section equalities and Zero stationary field gives the local bifurcate Killing-horizon and boundary data. The differentiated end notation and signed surface-gravity convention are Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity and Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization.
Sudarsky–Wald equation (23) supplies the nonmaximal Komar boundary identity. Reall §§8.1–8.2 supply the metric Hodge dual, future-normal/outward-sphere orientation and normalized Komar flux definition in (8.2), the orientation example (8.11)–(8.13), and (8.24). Reall §9.3 supplies the vacuum zeroth law on the established connected Killing sheet; §8.4 supplies stationary ADM/Komar equality and the ADM momentum and rest-mass definitions. The exact statements, hypotheses and reading limits are in the source records and External input.
The vacuum equation, normalized field , end metric coefficients, section identification, smooth transverse chronological-boundary sheets and ZFC convention are Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime. The smooth future unit normal , induced metric , second fundamental form and splitting use Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data.
A smooth embedded hypersurface has a local defining function with nonvanishing differential. Embedded submanifolds admit local defining submersions The chronological sets are open; for a past set and , . Openness of the chronological future and past, openness of the chronological relation, and closure of future and past sets Its Countable Choice and Dependent Choice hypotheses hold under the ZFC convention of [F3].
Proof
Given: The regular vacuum data and , with the section, orientation and horizon interfaces [F1], external identities [F2], geometric conventions [F3] and local boundary calculus [F4].
Goal: Establish the displayed positive normalized mass without a maximal-slice or staticity premise.
Work in the connected spacetime component containing the connected section and the selected end; is nontrivial there since it is timelike at infinity. At , let be the future unit normal to the original section and its unit normal to pointing into . The boost interface in [F1] gives and , with ; this follows also by writing its skew map in the orthonormal basis . Choose a smooth section curve into with and . In a smooth ambient chart, because and the connection correction to its first derivative vanishes there. Consequently for small . These points lie in ; the orientation supplier makes future timelike there. Taking forces . This fixes the sign of the already normalized , without rescaling it or choosing a sign for a horizon parameter.
Identify the future boundary sheet using , a past set, and near . Take a defining function from [F4], with at . The differential annihilates and is null, so . The past-set closure property gives points immediately to the timelike past of in , while a timelike-future point of cannot belong to , since that would put in the open past set. In a sufficiently small hypersurface chart, membership in is constant on each connected side of , so its local side is . Since , differentiation at and imply , hence . Thus the future normal generator of this sheet at is , and . On the future branch of its affine generator, the supplier's exact law is . Affineness gives , so its signed surface gravity is , with the same limit at . The vacuum zeroth law of Reall §9.3 makes this one constant on the connected local future Killing sheet and its bifurcation limit. The induced metric on the nonempty compact sphere has positive finite area .
Apply Sudarsky–Wald equation (23), the nonmaximal Komar identity, to the oriented section supplied in [F1]. It has compact core, only the bifurcation boundary , and the one normalized asymptotic end. The field is Killing and the geometry is vacuum by [F3]; itself generates the local horizon, so the rotational term is absent (), and the matter integral is zero. The identity therefore gives . Its derivation uses the section and its boundary fluxes, requiring neither an all-time ambient extension nor a maximal section.
In the specified end the same section is , , and , so it is asymptotically orthogonal to . Reall §8.4 therefore gives . Use the Hodge and flux conventions of [F2]: orient the end by , the section by its future normal and the end spheres outward. This orientation extends along the section using its radial chart and smooth future normal. Here , and stationarity gives and . In the limiting Minkowski metric the supplied Hodge convention gives , where is the positively oriented Euclidean sphere area form. The metric and inverse-metric corrections are , and the differentiated shift terms are , so on one has , uniformly in angle. Thus (8.24) gives , since and the integrated error is . For completeness, and the covariant end shift is . The tangential Killing equation and the convention of [F3] give , hence . Reall's momentum formula (8.44) therefore has limit zero, independently of its sign convention for . By (8.45), , since step 3.1 made this energy positive. Combining the identities proves the unchanged Statement.
External input
Sudarsky–Wald, PDF p.5, equation (23) and its following paragraph, gives for a stationary asymptotically flat Einstein geometry with a regular bifurcate Killing horizon and an oriented section from its bifurcation surface to infinity. The paragraph explicitly permits a nonmaximal section. Here vacuum and the normalized stationary field as horizon generator remove the volume and rotation terms. Mass formulas, equation (23)
Reall §9.3, printed p.117, gives constancy of surface gravity on a connected future Killing horizon under the dominant energy condition; equations (9.16)–(9.19) apply locally once the Killing-horizon premise is established, as it is here in vacuum. Reall §8.4, printed p.113, states for a stationary asymptotically flat end with asymptotically orthogonal constant-time surfaces and defines its momentum and rest mass in (8.44)–(8.45). Black Holes, §§8.4 and 9.3
Reall §8.1, (8.2), defines the two-form Hodge dual by . Its printed p.106 example fixes positive , the future-normal orientation on , and outward boundary spheres. Section 8.2, (8.24), defines on a stationary asymptotically flat end, where and are the coordinate spheres of (8.14). These conventions use signature and the stationary field normalized to unit future time translation at infinity; no maximality is required. Black Holes, §§8.1–8.2
Only these explicitly cited premises are imported. The normal-boost sign, future-branch identification and end application are local arguments above; the source proofs and any global rigidity, maximal-slice or positive-energy theorem are not reconstructed or assumed. The source records state the actual consulted passages and reading limits.
Depends on
- The exterior Cauchy component has a complete asymptotically Euclidean closure
- Stationary end access and future orientation need no maximal slice
- A working partial-Cauchy collar satisfies the source GR section equalities
- Zero stationary field gives the local bifurcate Killing-horizon and boundary data
- Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
- Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization
- Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
- Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
- Openness of the chronological future and past, openness of the chronological relation, and closure of future and past sets
- Embedded submanifolds admit local defining submersions
- D. Sudarsky and R. M. Wald, Mass Formulas for Stationary Einstein–Yang–Mills Black Holes and a Simple Proof of Two Staticity Theorems · PDF p.5, equation (23) and following paragraph; p.2, horizon generator normalization (4)
- H. S. Reall, Black Holes, Part III lecture notes, 15 March 2024 · §8.1, printed pp.105–106 (PDF pp.106–107), (8.2) and the orientation example (8.11)–(8.13); §8.2, printed pp.107–108 (PDF pp.108–109), (8.14) sphere convention and (8.24) Komar definition; §9.3, printed p.117 (PDF p.118), zeroth-law theorem and (9.16)–(9.19); §8.4, printed p.113 (PDF p.114), stationary ADM/Komar equality and (8.43)–(8.45)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The Komar mass identity is M−kappa A/(4pi)−2Omega J_H = 2 integral (T_munu−T g_munu/2)t^mu n^nu over a section with bifurcation boundary. The text explicitly says this identity does not require a maximal hypersurface. In vacuum with the stationary field itself the horizon generator, it gives M=kappa A/(4pi).
Hypotheses: Stationary asymptotically flat geometry with a regular bifurcate Killing horizon, normalized stationary field, an oriented spacelike section from its compact bifurcation surface to infinity, Einstein equation; specialize to zero matter and Omega=0. The identity is the local Stokes/Komar flux calculation on that section and assumes no complete Killing flow in a larger ambient spacetime.
Reading limits: Consulted the cached full PDF, PDF pp.2 and 5: normalization (4), equation (23), its Komar-to-volume derivation description, and its explicit nonmaximal qualification. Only that identity and its stated specialization are imported; no maximal-slice existence, staticity or positive-mass theorem is used or reviewed.
For an oriented Lorentzian four-manifold the Hodge dual of a two-form F is (star F)_ab=(1/2) epsilon_abcd F^cd, with indices raised by g. The orientation example uses positive dt wedge dr wedge dtheta wedge dphi, its future-normal section orientation and the outward boundary sphere orientation. For a stationary asymptotically flat end, (8.24) defines M_Komar=−(8pi)^(-1) lim integral over S_r of star d(T-flat), with T-flat the metric dual of the normalized stationary field and S_r the end-coordinate spheres. On a connected future Killing event horizon the surface gravity is constant under the dominant energy condition; in vacuum the local Killing-horizon calculation (9.16)–(9.19) gives this conclusion. In a stationary asymptotically flat spacetime E_ADM=M_Komar on constant-time surfaces asymptotically orthogonal to the timelike Killing field. Equations (8.43)–(8.45) define the ADM energy, momentum P_i=(8pi)^(-1)lim integral(K_ij n^j−K n_i)dA, and rest mass sqrt(E_ADM^2−P_i P_i).
Hypotheses: For the flux definition, a stationary asymptotically flat end with normalized stationary field, and a consistently oriented neighborhood of the spacelike section; use signature (−,+,+,+), the metric Hodge dual and outward end spheres. The displayed coordinate orientation is used in the specified end. Smooth connected Killing horizon with specified normalized generator; vacuum is the zero-stress case satisfying the dominant energy condition. For the mass equality and definitions: a differentiably asymptotically flat stationary end and a constant-time section asymptotically orthogonal to the normalized timelike Killing field. The opposite convention for extrinsic curvature reverses P_i and does not affect its vanishing or the rest mass. No assertion that a general stationary null surface is a Killing horizon is imported.
Reading limits: Consulted the cached full PDF at PDF pp.114 and 118, including the displayed equations and adjacent hypotheses; also read PDF pp.111–113 for the surrounding ADM end conventions. The local Killing-horizon premise and the positive sign for the fixed T are proved separately here. The cited zeroth-law derivation is used after that premise is supplied; no Hawking rigidity, global completion or positive-energy theorem is imported. The ADM/Komar equality is accepted as the stated external result, not locally reconstructed. For this repair, independently read the online PDF text of §§8.1–8.2, printed pp.105–108, specifically (8.2), the orientation example (8.11)–(8.13), the coordinate spheres after (8.14), and the definition (8.24). This additional reading supplies only the Hodge, orientation and flux conventions; their local end evaluation is given below. PDF screenshots were unavailable; no screenshot inspection or source-proof reconstruction is claimed.
Sources
- D. Sudarsky and R. M. Wald, Mass Formulas for Stationary Einstein–Yang–Mills Black Holes and a Simple Proof of Two Staticity Theorems · PDF p.5, equation (23) and following paragraph; p.2, horizon generator normalization (4)
- H. S. Reall, Black Holes, Part III lecture notes, 15 March 2024 · §8.1, printed pp.105–106 (PDF pp.106–107), (8.2) and the orientation example (8.11)–(8.13); §8.2, printed pp.107–108 (PDF pp.108–109), (8.14) sphere convention and (8.24) Komar definition; §9.3, printed p.117 (PDF p.118), zeroth-law theorem and (9.16)–(9.19); §8.4, printed p.113 (PDF p.114), stationary ADM/Komar equality and (8.43)–(8.45)