Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zero stationary field gives the local bifurcate Killing-horizon and boundary data

Statement

Let T be a nontrivial smooth Killing field on a connected smooth Lorentzian spacetime, vanishing on a smooth spacelike two-surface S. Suppose the two transverse smooth null sheets H+ and H− meet in S and T is tangent to them. In a sufficiently small neighborhood of S, both sheets are Killing horizons for T: T is nonzero, tangent and null-normal away from S. Thus they form a bifurcate Killing horizon in the standard neighborhood sense. If a smooth spacelike hypersurface has boundary S, its decomposition T=Nn+X satisfies N=X=0 on S. This establishes a local Killing-horizon interface, not a global completion of the event horizons.

More precisely, at every q∈S the linear map Aq(v)=∇vT annihilates TqS and preserves its Lorentzian normal two-plane, on which it is a nonzero skew map. Its two null eigenlines are the radical lines of the two sheets, with real eigenvalues λq and −λq, where λq≠0. If ℓ is a nonzero vector in either such line and Aqℓ=aqℓ, the affinely parametrized null geodesic γq(s)=exp⁡q(sℓ) lies in that sheet near s=0 and satisfies Tγq(s)=aqsγ˙q(s). These geodesics, with smooth local choices of ℓ along S, cover a neighborhood of S in the sheet. The sign of aq for a selected exterior and time orientation is not fixed by this generic assertion.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The inherited stationary-data convention is ZFC, including the Axiom of Choice. Its choice function applied to any countable family supplies the countable choice required by the smooth-manifold, geodesic and flowout suppliers. No geodesic completeness or global Killing flow is assumed. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The Killing, smooth null-sheet, bifurcate-horizon and spacelike lapse–shift conventions are Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions Rotation, surface gravity and horizon degeneracy Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data. The null normal line is the radical of the induced form; its integral curves are not assumed affine or complete.

[F2]

The smooth nondegenerate metric has a unique torsion-free metric-compatible connection. Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields

[F3]

On the stated time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold, geodesics with given position and velocity exist uniquely locally, depend smoothly on the initial data, obey affine scaling, and define an exponential map that is a local diffeomorphism at the zero vector. The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection

[F4]

A smooth vector field on a boundaryless manifold has a unique smooth local flow on an open time–point domain, with the flow law and mutually inverse time maps. This applies to T on M and to a local radical field on an open part of a null sheet. The fundamental theorem on flows

[F5]

The local flow of a smooth vector field transverse to an embedded codimension-one submanifold gives an embedded flowout, a diffeomorphism onto an open neighborhood of that submanifold. The flowout theorem

[F6]

A smooth embedded hypersurface admits near each point a smooth defining function u with du≠0 and H={u=0}. Embedded submanifolds admit local defining submersions

Proof

Given: The smooth objects in the Statement, with the inherited ZFC convention in [A1] and the geometric interfaces in [F1]–[F6].

Goal: Identify the local generator and the zero boundary lapse and shift.

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4

The local flow Φt of T is defined on a common neighborhood for sufficiently small t. The flow law and the definition of Lie derivative give ddtΦt∗g=Φt∗(LTg)=0, so each such time map is a local isometry. Pulling the Levi–Civita connection back by this map gives another torsion-free metric-compatible connection; uniqueness makes it the same connection. Thus Φt takes affinely parametrized geodesics to affinely parametrized geodesics, with their pushed-forward initial velocities. Geodesic uniqueness yields Φt(exp⁡pv)=exp⁡Φt(p)(dΦt∣pv) whenever the geodesic segment and its image lie in the common local domain. These are local statements, requiring no complete flow.

1.2givenF1F2F6

Fix either null sheet H near a point of S. Choose the local defining function u from [F6] and set L=(du)♯. Along H, this is a smooth nonzero field spanning (TH)⊥, which equals the radical line in TH because H is null. Torsion-freeness makes the Hessian of u symmetric: its antisymmetric part on U,V is U(Vu)−V(Uu)−[U,V]u=0. Metric compatibility therefore gives, for every Y∈TH, g(∇LL,Y)=Hess⁡u(L,Y)=Hess⁡u(Y,L)=12Y(g(L,L))=0 on H. The last equality holds because g(L,L) vanishes identically there. Hence ∇LL=fL on H for a smooth scalar f; smoothness follows locally by dividing any nonzero component of L. This proves the pregeodesic property rather than assuming it from the horizon terminology.

2.1givenF3F4step 1.1

Write Ap(v)=∇vT and consider Z={p:Tp=0, Ap=0}. It is closed by smoothness. If p∈Z, flow uniqueness fixes p, and in coordinates the variational equation for Jt=dΦt∣p is Jt′=(dT)pJt=0, J0=id; here (dT)p=Ap because Tp=0. Hence dΦt∣p=id. The exponential identity of step 1.1 and the local diffeomorphism in [F3] make Φt the identity on a neighborhood of p for all sufficiently small t. One may choose the neighborhood and time interval together by shrinking inside the open local-flow domain and a small exponential-coordinate ball. Differentiating at t=0 makes T zero there, hence also ∇T=0 there. Thus Z is open. If nonempty it is all of connected M, contradicting the nontriviality of T. Therefore Z is empty.

2.2givenA1F3F4F5step 1.2

The radical line is transverse to S inside H: a nonzero null vector cannot lie in the positive-definite plane TqS. Let Ψr be the local flow of L∣H. Applied within the three-manifold H to a small embedded patch of its codimension-one submanifold S, [F5] makes (r,q)↦Ψr(q) a diffeomorphism onto an open sheet neighborhood. Along each curve define cq(r)=exp⁡(∫0rf(Ψv(q)) dv) and sq(r)=∫0rcq(v) dv. Then cq>0, sq′=cq and cq′=fcq. Reparametrizing by s=sq(r) gives velocity L/cq and acceleration cq−2(∇LL−(cq′/cq)L)=0. Its initial velocity is Lq, so [F3] identifies it with γq(s)=exp⁡q(sLq). The strictly increasing parameter change preserves this local coverage and has s=0 exactly on S. Thus these affine null-normal geodesics issuing from S cover the sheet locally, with nonzero tangent L/cq.

3.1givenF1F2step 2.1

At q∈S, differentiating the zero restriction T∣S gives Aq∣TqS=0. Metric compatibility, torsion-freeness and LTg=0 give g(∇UT,V)+g(U,∇VT)=0, so Aq is g-skew. Consequently its image lies in (TqS)⊥, and this Lorentzian normal two-plane is invariant. In a null basis ℓ+,ℓ− with g(ℓ+,ℓ−)=−1, skewness forces Aqℓ+=λqℓ+ and Aqℓ−=−λqℓ−. If λq=0 then Aq=0 on both the normal plane and TqS, putting q in Z, impossible by step 2.1. Thus λq≠0.

4.1givenF1F3F4step 1.1step 3.1step 2.2

At each q∈S the two transverse sheets have distinct radical lines in (TqS)⊥: coincident radicals would give equal tangent hyperplanes, each the orthogonal complement of that same line. Label their local nonzero initial fields ℓ± accordingly. Step 3.1 gives the respective eigenvalues ±λq. Since the Killing flow fixes q, its differential satisfies the constant-coefficient variational equation with coefficient Aq and hence sends ℓ± to e±tλqℓ±. By step 1.1 and geodesic scaling, Φt(exp⁡q(sℓ±))=exp⁡q(e±tλqsℓ±) for small parameters. Differentiating at t=0 gives T=±λqs∂s on the sheet. Step 2.2 ensures that these coordinates cover a neighborhood in each sheet and that ∂s spans its radical. Thus T is tangent, null-normal and nonzero away from S. Taking the union of sufficiently small such neighborhoods along S gives the claimed neighborhood sense of a bifurcate Killing horizon. No uniform collar width for noncompact S, all-time flow, global causal completion or compact-core section is inferred.

5.1givenF1step 4.1∎

Finally N=−g(T,n)=0 at S and X=T−Nn=0 there by the orthogonal decomposition. Conversely if T is tangent to both sheets and lies in the null-generator line of either at their spacelike intersection, it is a vector of TS which is also null, and is therefore zero. These pointwise boundary consequences require no maximal slice.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.