Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Linear fourth derivative bound with controlled realized coefficients

Statement

Work in ZFC. Let n≥2 be an integer, 0<α<1, and let A′,A⊂Rn be fixed bounded Euclidean annuli with A′‾⊂A. Let z be smooth on A and solve Lz=aijzij+bjzj+cz=f, with summation over i,j=1,…,n. Suppose a is symmetric and λ∣ξ∣2≤aij(x)ξiξj≤Λ∣ξ∣2 for all x∈A and ξ∈Rn, where 0<λ≤Λ<∞. Suppose every component of a,b,c has C2,α(A) norm at most M<∞, and f∈C2,α(A). Then ∥z∥C4,α(A′)≤C(∥z∥L∞(A)+∥f∥C2,α(A)). Here C depends only on n,α,λ,Λ,M and the fixed annular geometry, including the positive separation dist⁡(A′‾,∂A). The coefficients are the realized functions of position, even if originally obtained by evaluating a nonlinear operator at z,Dz; their stated bounds must hold as functions of position. In particular the same C works for any family with these common bounds.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The interior linear Schauder estimate applies on a ball to a bounded classical solution of a uniformly elliptic equation with controlled C0,α coefficients, including first-order and zeroth-order terms. Its constant depends only on dimension, exponent, ellipticity and the stated scaled coefficient bounds. Interior Schauder estimate for uniformly elliptic equations

[F2]

Use the Euclidean Hölder norms and their scaled ball versions. The product estimate needed below follows directly from p(x)q(x)−p(y)q(y)=p(x)(q(x)−q(y))+q(y)(p(x)−p(y)): [pq]0,α≤∥p∥∞[q]0,α+∥q∥∞[p]0,α. Hölder spaces C^k,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and C^k,α domains

[F3]

The repeated-index expression L=aij∂i∂j+bj∂j+c and the constants λ,Λ have the uniformly elliptic nondivergence-operator convention. Differentiating the equation keeps this same principal operator. Uniformly elliptic nondivergence-form operators and their frozen coefficients

[A1]

Work in ZFC. Full Choice implies the Countable Choice assumed by the Schauder supplier; that implication is the use of Choice in each invocation of [F1]. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the asserted estimate with the stated uniform dependence.

1.1F1F2F3A1givenalgebra

If ∥z∥L∞(A) is infinite, the claimed inequality is automatic in the extended sense, so assume it finite and put N=∥z∥L∞(A)+∥f∥C2,α(A). Fix intermediate open sets with A′⋐U2⋐U1⋐A, where V⋐W means V‾ is compact and contained in W. For any of these three successive inclusions, positive separation allows balls of a common fixed radius centered in the smaller set and contained in the larger set. Apply [F1] on these balls and convert its scaled norms to ordinary norms. The local derivative bounds give the global suprema on the smaller set. For Hölder quotients, pairs closer than half a target-ball radius lie in one target ball; separated pairs are bounded by twice the derivative supremum divided by that fixed distance to the power α. A finite cover of the compact closure gives the same bounds, with constants depending only on the fixed geometry. The coefficient C0,α bounds needed on each ball follow from the assumed C2,α bounds and the derivative bounds on that convex ball. Consequently [F1] applied to Lz=f gives ∥z∥C2,α(U1)≤CN.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3A1givenalgebra

Differentiate once in coordinate k. The equation is Lzk=fk−akijzij−bkjzj−ckz. On the balls contained in U1, its right-hand side has C0,α norm at most CN by step 1.1, the coefficient bounds and the product estimate [F2]. Also ∥zk∥L∞(U1)≤CN. Applying [F1] with the same elliptic operator and assembling the ball estimates as in step 1.1 yields ∥z∥C3,α(U2)≤CN.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2F3A1givenalgebra∎

Differentiate twice. The equation for zkℓ has the same left-hand operator L and right-hand side fkℓ−akℓijzij−akijzijℓ−aℓijzijk−bkℓjzj−bkjzjℓ−bℓjzjk−ckℓz−ckzℓ−cℓzk. On balls contained in U2 its C0,α norm is at most CN by step 2.1, [F2] and the coefficient bounds; the same bound holds for ∥zkℓ∥∞. Apply [F1] to every zkℓ and assemble the estimates on A′ by step 1.1. This bounds z in C4,α(A′) by CN. All constants depend only on the listed geometry, dimension, exponent, ellipticity and realized coefficient bounds, so the asserted family uniformity follows.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.