How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hawking and rotational fields near a bifurcate sphere
Statement
Let be a connected oriented smooth four-dimensional Ricci-flat spacetime, with the metric and Killing-field conventions of Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions. Let be a regular bifurcate non-expanding null horizon pair in the precise pre-rigidity sense of Regular bifurcate null horizon data before rigidity. There is an open neighborhood of and a nontrivial smooth Killing field tangent to the null generators of both branches. This conclusion assumes no previously existing Killing generator.
If additionally a smooth Killing field is tangent to both branches and , one may shrink so that and there is a constant for which is a nontrivial rotational Killing field commuting with . Rotational means that its local flow has a common positive period on the chosen neighborhood; after constant rescaling it has the normalized circle-action convention of Periodic isometries and invariant normal averaging. The conclusions concern a full neighborhood of , not extension over the entire exterior.
Facts & Assumptions
The regular null-horizon pair defines the pre-rigidity sphere, causal branches and zero-expansion conditions without positing a Killing generator. Regular bifurcate null horizon data before rigidity
Positive generator rescaling preserves zero expansion; the null second fundamental form and its trace are defined on the screen independently of a transverse section. Rescaling a null generator preserves zero expansion Null second fundamental form descends to the screen quotient
The null-metric transport identity identifies the geometric meaning of the null form, without using a rigidity conclusion or deriving shear-freeness from trace alone. Metric transport along a null generator
A Killing field tangent to both branches restricts to a Killing field of the bifurcation sphere; the additional nontriviality condition means not identically zero there. A branch-tangent Killing field restricts to the bifurcation sphere
Ambient Killing fields use the Lorentzian convention and normalized rotational fields use the circle-action convention. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions Periodic isometries and invariant normal averaging
External input
Theorem 1.1 of Alexakis–Ionescu–Klainerman supplies the full-neighborhood Hawking field under the stated regular non-expanding bifurcate-horizon hypotheses. Their Theorem 1.2 and §5 Propositions 5.1–5.2 supply the commuting field and the linear combination with a common positive period under the additional branch-tangent symmetry hypothesis. These conclusions are imported inputs, not proofs reconstructed here. The five preceding local items formulate and relate the pre-rigidity data; they do not claim to replace the characteristic existence and unique-continuation arguments of the cited source. The exact source statement, hypotheses and actual reading limits are recorded in the citation metadata.
Depends on
- Regular bifurcate null horizon data before rigidity
- Rescaling a null generator preserves zero expansion
- Null second fundamental form descends to the screen quotient
- Metric transport along a null generator
- A branch-tangent Killing field restricts to the bifurcation sphere
- Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
- Periodic isometries and invariant normal averaging
- S. Alexakis, A. D. Ionescu and S. Klainerman, Hawking’s local rigidity theorem without analyticity · §1 setup and Theorems 1.1–1.2 (pp. 1–2); §2 Definition 2.1 (p. 6); §5 Propositions 5.1–5.2 (pp. 16–17)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
A local regular bifurcate non-expanding horizon in a connected oriented smooth four-dimensional vacuum spacetime admits a nontrivial generator-tangent Killing field in a full neighborhood of its bifurcation sphere. An additional Killing field tangent to both branches and not identically zero on the sphere admits a commuting nontrivial rotational Killing field; §5 gives [T,K]=0 and Z=T+lambda_0 K with a common positive period.
Hypotheses: Embedded spacelike two-sphere; neighborhood where the two local causal null boundaries are regular achronal null hypersurfaces generated orthogonally from the sphere; both expansions vanish; Ric(g)=0. For the rotational conclusion also a smooth Killing field T tangent to both branches whose restriction to the sphere is not identically zero.
Reading limits: Read the downloaded arXiv:0902.1173v1 PDF text at §1 pp. 1–4, §2 pp. 4–6 through Definition 2.1 and §5 Proposition 5.1–5.2 statements and adjacent proof text; visually inspected PDF p. 2. Did not independently reconstruct the characteristic existence or unique-continuation proofs in §§3–4, nor the proof of the sphere-periodicity input in Lemma 5.3. These are imported established inputs, not locally reconstructed proofs. The abstract clarifies the §1 phrase non-vanishing on S as not vanishing identically; no nowhere-zero field on the sphere is assumed.
Sources
- S. Alexakis, A. D. Ionescu and S. Klainerman, Hawking’s local rigidity theorem without analyticity · §1 setup and Theorems 1.1–1.2 (pp. 1–2); §2 Definition 2.1 (p. 6); §5 Propositions 5.1–5.2 (pp. 16–17)