Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equal value groups preserve valuation rank

PDF p. 6: Proposition 2.6 proof

Statement

For a valuation ring V, its rank means its Krull dimension, the supremum of lengths of finite strict chains of prime ideals. An extension of valuation rings f:V↪W means an injective ring homomorphism with f−1(mW)=mV, where mV and mW are the unique maximal ideals. Put K=Frac⁡(V), L=Frac⁡(W) and ΓV=K×/V×, and similarly for W. If the induced value-group map ϕ:ΓV→ΓW is surjective, it is an isomorphism of ordered groups. Contraction and extension give mutually inverse inclusion-preserving bijections between the prime ideals of W and V, and rank⁡(W)=rank⁡(V), allowing infinite rank.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The extension f and the surjectivity of ϕ in the statement. Identify V with its image in W, and embed K in L by a/b↦f(a)/f(b); the fraction equivalence makes this well defined and injective.

Goal: Identify prime ideals and compare their finite strict chains.

[F1]

Valuation rings are domains satisfying the inverse-membership alternative, and their nonunits form the unique maximal ideal. Valuation rings A valuation ring is local

[F2]

The fraction field is formed from fractions with nonzero denominators. The field of fractions Frac(D)=(D∖{0})⁻¹D of an integral domain

[F3]

Write vV and vW for the canonical valuations. Their ordered groups have vV(y)≥vV(x) exactly when y/x∈V for nonzero x,y; values are nonnegative exactly on the ring, and the ultrametric inequality holds. Equality of values means that the quotient is a unit. The value group of a valuation ring A valuation ring is recovered from its value group

[F4]

A prime ideal is a proper ideal satisfying the product test; Krull dimension is the supremum of the lengths of finite strict prime chains. Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring Krull dimension of a nonzero ring

[F5]

A ring homomorphism preserves addition, multiplication and 1; in particular, f(u)f(u−1)=1 for every unit u. Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send 1 to 1

[F6]

An ideal of a commutative ring is an additive subgroup stable under multiplication by every ring element; in particular it is closed under finite sums. Left, right and two-sided ideals

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3F5F6

A nonzero z∈K outside V has z−1∈mV: otherwise z−1 would be a unit of V. Localness sends this inverse into mW, so z cannot belong to W. Hence W∩K=V. The map ϕ is well defined since units of V remain units of W, and it is injective since V∩W×=V×. The equality W∩K=V shows that ϕ(vV(z))≥0 if and only if vV(z)≥0, so ϕ preserves and reflects order. Its assumed surjectivity makes it an ordered-group isomorphism. Every nonzero w∈W now has the same value as some nonzero a∈V: surjectivity first gives a∈K×, and order reflection puts a in V. Thus w/a∈W×. Consequently every ideal J of W satisfies J=(J∩V)W, since each nonzero w∈J is a unit times such an a∈J∩V. Here IW denotes finite sums of products aw with a∈I,w∈W, and J∩V denotes contraction.

2.1F3F4F5F6step 1.1∎

For a prime ideal p of V, show (pW)∩V=p. If 0≠x∈(pW)∩V, write x=∑i=1naiwi with ai∈p,wi∈W. Some ai is nonzero; choose a nonzero aj with least value among this finite list. Then each ai/aj∈V (including zero coefficients), so x/aj∈W∩K=V, and x∈p. The reverse containment is immediate. In particular pW is proper. If ww′∈pW with w,w′≠0, step 1.1 writes them as units times a,a′∈V. Thus aa′∈pW∩V=p, so a∈p or a′∈p, and w∈pW or w′∈pW. A zero factor already lies in this ideal. Hence pW is prime. Contraction of a prime of W is prime by the product test and preservation of 1. Step 1.1 and the contraction equality give inverse maps, each preserving inclusion; they therefore preserve strict chains and their lengths. Taking suprema proves equality of ranks, also for fields and for infinite rank. Only finitely many witnesses at a time were chosen.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.