How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Inductive Ramsey membership for H2
PDF p. 3: Section 3, final paragraph; PDF p. 4: Section 3, first paragraph
Statement
Use the recursive separator construction: ; are non-isomorphic finite connected simple graphs, each with an edge, ordered by decreasing largest block order and then, in case of equality, by decreasing vertex order. A block is a maximal 2-connected subgraph or a bridge with its endpoints; its order is its number of vertices. The construction fixes an independent set of , its induced remainder , and a core graph such that every colouring of with available colours has a monochromatic induced copy of . It defines and, for , forms from a copy of and a disjoint copy of for each chosen induced-copy vertex set of in and each , with the prescribed neighbourhood attachments.
For , if , then . Here membership in means that every function from the graph's vertex set to has a monochromatic induced copy of : an injective image preserving adjacency and nonadjacency whose vertices all have one colour. Colours need not all be used.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Under the stated construction and , if an attachment uses at most colours under an -colouring of , it contains a monochromatic induced copy of , which remains induced in . An attachment using fewer colours supplies H2
Under the stated construction, if every attachment uses all colours under an -colouring of , the core contains a monochromatic induced copy of and representatives of its colour from the corresponding attachments extend it to a monochromatic induced copy of in . A monochromatic F extends through all-colour attachments
An -colouring is a function into ; an attachment uses exactly the colours in the image of its vertex set under that function. The induced Ramsey-class condition quantifies over every such function. Unrestricted finite colourings and used palettes Induced vertex-Ramsey class
Proof
Given: The recursive construction, , and .
Goal: Show that .
Let be arbitrary. If some attachment does not use every colour in this palette, its used palette has at most elements. By F1 it contains a monochromatic induced copy of that is also induced in .
Otherwise every attachment uses all colours, including vacuously if there are no attachments. F2 then gives a monochromatic induced copy of in . Thus in either case the arbitrary colouring has such a copy. By the definition of the induced Ramsey class, .
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Maria Axenovich and Patrick Schmitteckert, Non-isomorphic graphs have distinct vertex-Ramsey classes, arXiv:2610.03704v1 · PDF p. 3, Section 3, final paragraph; PDF p. 4, Section 3, first paragraph