Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inductive Ramsey membership for H2

PDF p. 3: Section 3, final paragraph; PDF p. 4: Section 3, first paragraph

Statement

Use the recursive separator construction: k≥2; H1,H2 are non-isomorphic finite connected simple graphs, each with an edge, ordered by decreasing largest block order and then, in case of equality, by decreasing vertex order. A block is a maximal 2-connected subgraph or a bridge with its endpoints; its order is its number of vertices. The construction fixes an independent set I of H2, its induced remainder F=H2−I, and a core graph A such that every colouring of V(A) with k available colours has a monochromatic induced copy of F. It defines A1=H2 and, for 2≤r≤k, forms Ar from a copy of A and a disjoint copy of Ar−1 for each chosen induced-copy vertex set of F in A and each u∈I, with the prescribed neighbourhood attachments.

For 2≤r≤k, if Ar−1∈Rindr−1(H2), then Ar∈Rindr(H2). Here membership in Rinds(H2) means that every function from the graph's vertex set to {1,…,s} has a monochromatic induced copy of H2: an injective image preserving adjacency and nonadjacency whose vertices all have one colour. Colours need not all be used.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Under the stated construction and Ar−1∈Rindr−1(H2), if an attachment uses at most r−1 colours under an r-colouring of Ar, it contains a monochromatic induced copy of H2, which remains induced in Ar. An attachment using fewer colours supplies H2

[F2]

Under the stated construction, if every attachment uses all r colours under an r-colouring of Ar, the core contains a monochromatic induced copy of F and representatives of its colour from the corresponding attachments extend it to a monochromatic induced copy of H2 in Ar. A monochromatic F extends through all-colour attachments

[F3]

An r-colouring is a function into {1,…,r}; an attachment uses exactly the colours in the image of its vertex set under that function. The induced Ramsey-class condition quantifies over every such function. Unrestricted finite colourings and used palettes Induced vertex-Ramsey class

Proof

Given: The recursive construction, 2≤r≤k, and Ar−1∈Rindr−1(H2).

Goal: Show that Ar∈Rindr(H2).

1.1givenF1F3choose

Let c:V(Ar)→{1,…,r} be arbitrary. If some attachment does not use every colour in this palette, its used palette has at most r−1 elements. By F1 it contains a monochromatic induced copy of H2 that is also induced in Ar.

2.1givenF2F3step 1.1∎

Otherwise every attachment uses all r colours, including vacuously if there are no attachments. F2 then gives a monochromatic induced copy of H2 in Ar. Thus in either case the arbitrary colouring c has such a copy. By the definition of the induced Ramsey class, Ar∈Rindr(H2).

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources