How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An attachment using fewer colours supplies H2
PDF p. 3: Section 3, final paragraph
Statement
Use the hypotheses and notation of the recursive separator construction, with . Thus and are finite simple graphs and each attachment is a copy of whose internal edges are retained in . Assume : every function from to has a monochromatic induced copy of . In any function , if an attachment uses at most colours, then that attachment contains a monochromatic induced copy of . Here an induced copy is the image of an injective vertex map preserving adjacency and nonadjacency; monochromatic means its image vertices have one common colour.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The recursive construction makes each attachment a copy of , retains its internal edges, and adds edges only between parts and the core. Thus its inclusion in is an induced embedding. Recursive graphs Ar and their attachments Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph
Membership in means that every colouring of by the available palette has a monochromatic induced embedding of . Colours need not all be used. Induced vertex-Ramsey class Unrestricted finite colourings and used palettes
A colouring with at most used colours can be injectively relabelled into without changing its monochromatic subsets. Composing induced embeddings gives an induced embedding, and restriction preserves the colours of its vertices. Transport, restriction and relabelling of finite colourings Injection, surjection, bijection
Proof
Given: The recursive construction, the Ramsey-class assumption, the colouring , and an attachment using at most colours.
Goal: Find a monochromatic induced copy of inside .
Let be the graph isomorphism supplied by the copy construction. Pull the colouring back along , obtaining on . Its used palette has at most elements. Since is positive, injectively relabel that palette into to obtain a colouring with exactly the same monochromatic vertex subsets as .
By the Ramsey-class assumption applied to , there is an induced embedding whose image is monochromatic for , hence also for . The isomorphism is an induced embedding, so is an induced embedding into ; its image is monochromatic for by the definition of . Therefore contains the required copy. Its inclusion into also preserves the induced copy.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Maria Axenovich and Patrick Schmitteckert, Non-isomorphic graphs have distinct vertex-Ramsey classes, arXiv:2610.03704v1 · PDF p. 3, Section 3, final paragraph