How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induced vertex-Ramsey class
PDF p. 1: Abstract; Introduction, first paragraph
Definition
Let be a finite simple graph with at least one vertex, and let be a positive integer. The induced -colour vertex-Ramsey class of , denoted , consists of those finite simple graphs with at least one vertex for which the following holds: for every function , there is an injection such that is constant on and, for all distinct , if and only if .
Thus the image vertices induce a copy of and all have the same colour. A colouring need not use every colour, and adjacent vertices may receive the same colour. Membership is understood as a predicate on graphs; no set of all graphs with arbitrary vertex labels is assumed.
Justification
The graph conventions specify the finite simple graphs and their vertex and edge sets. The colouring definition supplies the functions and the meaning of constant colour on the image. The induced-embedding definition identifies the displayed adjacency and nonadjacency condition with an induced copy isomorphic to . Consequently the displayed condition determines membership for each graph without choosing a representative or assuming a universal set of graphs.
Depends on
Used by · 24
- Nonemptiness attributed to Folkman
- Construction 1 gives an induced vertex-Ramsey graph
- Complementation preserves distinction of induced classes
- Induced Ramsey graph with the same independence number
- Ramsey repetition property at fixed k
- Connected targets have repetition
- Independence gap for the join of components
- Disjoint-copy witness against repetition
- Lemma 2.1: repetition characterizes connectivity
- The k=1 case
- Reduction to connected targets
- Single-vertex target case
- Edgeless choice of A
- Existence of the base graph A
- Fewer colours for the base graph
- The implicit r=1 base case
- Inductive colouring avoiding H1
- An attachment using fewer colours supplies H2
- A monochromatic F extends through all-colour attachments
- Inductive Ramsey membership for H2
- Invariant of the recursive induced separator
- Final induced-Ramsey separator
- Induced part of Theorem 1.1
- Theorem 1.1: both vertex-Ramsey distinctions
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Maria Axenovich and Patrick Schmitteckert, Non-isomorphic graphs have distinct vertex-Ramsey classes, arXiv:2610.03704v1 · PDF p. 1, Abstract and Introduction, first paragraph