How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonemptiness attributed to Folkman
PDF p. 1: Introduction, first paragraph, citation [4]; PDF p. 4: References [4]
Statement
For every finite simple graph with at least one vertex and every positive integer , the induced -colour vertex-Ramsey class is nonempty.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
By Graph and colouring conventions, a graph here has a nonempty finite vertex set and an edge set consisting of two-element subsets. A vertex -colouring is any function into . An induced copy of in a graph preserves both adjacency and nonadjacency, and is monochromatic when its vertices all have the same colour.
By Induced vertex-Ramsey class, exactly when is a nonempty finite simple graph and every vertex -colouring of has a monochromatic induced copy of .
For a finite graph of order at least two, High-girth hypergraphs for Construction 1 supplies a finite -uniform hypergraph of Berge girth at least three with no weak -colouring. Here uniformity means each hyperedge has vertices; no weak -colouring means every assignment of the colours to its vertices has a monochromatic hyperedge. By Construction 1: graph G(H,q,k), this hypergraph and bijections from to its hyperedges give choices for the graph . The hypergraph terms, including Berge cycles and Berge girth, have the meanings in Hypergraph terminology used in Construction 1, and bijections have the meaning in Injection, surjection, bijection.
By Construction 1 gives an induced vertex-Ramsey graph, every graph obtained from those construction choices belongs to .
Proof
Given: A finite simple graph with at least one vertex and a positive integer .
Goal: Exhibit a graph in .
If , use F3 to choose a hypergraph and the finite family of bijections defining . The construction theorem F4 places this graph in .
If , take . Every vertex -colouring of makes its sole vertex monochromatic. The identity on that vertex is an induced copy of in , since there are no pairs of distinct vertices on which adjacency or nonadjacency needs checking. Thus by F2.
The nonempty finite vertex set of has either one vertex or at least two, so one of the preceding steps supplies a member of the class. Hence the class is nonempty.
Source notes
The article attributes the nonemptiness assertion to Folkman. That attribution is recorded here without using the article or the unread Folkman paper as a proof premise.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Maria Axenovich and Patrick Schmitteckert, Non-isomorphic graphs have distinct vertex-Ramsey classes, arXiv:2610.03704v1 · PDF p. 1, Introduction, first paragraph, citation [4]; PDF p. 4, References [4]