How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Graph and colouring conventions
PDF p. 1: Introduction, first paragraph; PDF p. 2: Section 3, complete-graph construction
Definition
For this treatment, a graph is a finite simple graph with at least one vertex: is a nonempty finite set and is a set of two-element subsets of . Two distinct vertices are adjacent when their two-element set is an edge, and are nonadjacent otherwise.
A subgraph of has and . A graph isomorphism is a bijection between vertex sets that preserves and reflects adjacency. A copy of in is a subgraph of isomorphic to ; extra edges of between its vertices need not be edges of the copy. An induced copy is a copy whose edge set contains every edge of between its vertices, so both adjacency and nonadjacency agree with those in .
For a positive integer , a -colouring of the vertices of is a function . It need not use every colour and adjacent vertices may have the same colour. A copy is monochromatic if has the same value at all its vertices.
For a positive integer , denotes a complete graph on vertices, meaning that every two distinct vertices are adjacent. An edgeless graph is a graph whose edge set is empty.
Justification
The finite-simple-graph convention specifies the vertex and edge sets and makes adjacency a definite condition. The subgraph and isomorphism definitions specify ordinary copies; equivalently, an edge-preserving injection gives a copy on its image vertices with its image edges. Requiring all host edges between those vertices gives the induced-subgraph condition, equivalently the adjacency-reflection condition for an induced embedding. The colouring supplier defines the function and monochromatic predicate without requiring surjectivity or proper colouring. The standard graph supplier specifies complete graphs and empty edge sets. Thus these conventions have definite meanings and are compatible with their suppliers.
Definition references
A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets
Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs
Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements
Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph
Extraction notes
The article explicitly imposes the nonempty-vertex convention and defines a copy as an isomorphic subgraph. Finiteness and simplicity are conventions of this treatment for the article's finite graph constructions; the cited passages do not separately state those axioms.
Depends on
- A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets
- Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs
- Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements
- Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph
- Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that Pₙ and Cₙ have n vertices
- Unrestricted finite colourings and used palettes
- Ordinary embeddings as injections preserving edges
Used by · 35
- Ordinary vertex-Ramsey class
- Induced vertex-Ramsey class
- Nonemptiness attributed to Folkman
- Edge-Ramsey class terminology in the motivation
- Order, size, complement and independence number
- Blocks and the parameter beta
- Join of graphs
- Induced forbidden-subgraph class
- Hypergraph terminology used in Construction 1
- Construction 1: graph G(H,q,k)
- Construction 1 gives an induced vertex-Ramsey graph
- Induced Ramsey graph with the same independence number
- The disjoint multiple qA
- Ramsey repetition property at fixed k
- Connected targets have repetition
- Independence gap for the join of components
- Disjoint-copy witness against repetition
- Lemma 2.1: repetition characterizes connectivity
- The k=1 case
- Orienting equal-order non-isomorphic targets
- Join separator for equal-order targets
- Ordinary part of Theorem 1.1
- Reduction to connected targets
- Single-vertex target case
- Ordering targets and excluding H1 from H2
- The independent set I and remainder F
- Block bounds in the edged-F case
- Block exclusion in the high-girth base graph
- Existence of the base graph A
- Fewer colours for the base graph
- The implicit r=1 base case
- An attachment using fewer colours supplies H2
- Invariant of the recursive induced separator
- Induced part of Theorem 1.1
- Theorem 1.1: both vertex-Ramsey distinctions
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Maria Axenovich and Patrick Schmitteckert, Non-isomorphic graphs have distinct vertex-Ramsey classes, arXiv:2610.03704v1 · PDF p. 1, Introduction, first paragraph; PDF p. 2, Section 3, complete-graph construction