How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Theorem 1.1: both vertex-Ramsey distinctions
PDF p. 1: Abstract; Theorem 1.1; PDF p. 2: Section 3, ordinary part; PDF p. 3: Section 3, induced part; PDF p. 4: Section 3, conclusion
Statement
Let be non-isomorphic finite simple graphs, each with at least one vertex, and let be a positive integer. Then and .
Graphs are isomorphic if a bijection between their vertex sets preserves and reflects adjacency. For a graph , is the collection of nonempty finite simple graphs for which every function has a monochromatic ordinary copy of : a subgraph isomorphic to whose vertices all have one colour. The induced class uses the same condition with induced copies, which also preserve nonadjacency. Equality of classes means equality of membership for every such graph .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
For non-isomorphic nonempty finite simple graphs and any positive integer , their ordinary -colour vertex-Ramsey classes are distinct. Ordinary part of Theorem 1.1
For non-isomorphic nonempty finite simple graphs and any positive integer , their induced -colour vertex-Ramsey classes are distinct. Induced part of Theorem 1.1
Proof
Given: Non-isomorphic finite simple graphs , each with at least one vertex, and a positive integer .
Goal: Prove both stated inequalities of vertex-Ramsey classes.
The given graphs and colour count satisfy the hypotheses of F1. Therefore .
The same hypotheses satisfy F2. Therefore . Combining the two inequalities proves the statement.
Source notes
The article citation attributes the combined theorem. The argument above composes the separate ordinary and induced results.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Maria Axenovich and Patrick Schmitteckert, Non-isomorphic graphs have distinct vertex-Ramsey classes, arXiv:2610.03704v1 · PDF p. 1, Abstract and Theorem 1.1; PDF pp. 2–4, Section 3