How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induced forbidden-subgraph class
PDF p. 1: Section 2, first paragraph
Definition
Let be a graph under the conventions of this treatment: a finite simple graph with at least one vertex. The induced forbidden-subgraph class consists of all such graphs for which there is no induced copy of in . Equivalently, there is no injection such that, for every pair of distinct vertices of , if and only if .
Definition references
Justification
The graph conventions specify the admissible graphs, while the induced-copy definition makes the stated injection condition equivalent to the existence of an induced copy. Negating that condition therefore determines membership for each admissible . The word class permits arbitrary vertex labels and does not require the collection of all such graphs to be a set.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Maria Axenovich and Patrick Schmitteckert, Non-isomorphic graphs have distinct vertex-Ramsey classes, arXiv:2610.03704v1 · PDF p. 1, Section 2, first paragraph