Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex Algebraic Stratified Topology Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This companion page works the smallest failure of naive finite triangulation. The complex affine line C is not compact, so it is not homeomorphic to the realization of any finite simplicial complex; it is nevertheless homeomorphic to the realization of a finite complex with one boundary vertex deleted, via the octahedral boundary complex and stereographic projection. The example fixes the deleted-boundary convention under which the finite triangulation statements of the companion page apply to noncompact quasi-projective varieties.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A noncompact algebraic line needs a deleted boundary triangulation

Example

The analytic complex affine line A1(C)=C cannot be homeomorphic to the realization of a finite simplicial complex. It is homeomorphic to a finite triangulated compactification with one boundary vertex deleted. Thus "finite triangulation" for noncompact varieties must allow a deleted subcomplex or another equivalent noncompact finite-cell convention.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The usual analytic topology on C=R2, and the fixed complex structure that identifies a+bi with (a,b) (Complex m-space and its real coordinate dictionary, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).

[F1]

The realization of a finite simplicial complex is compact (A finite simplicial complex has a compact Hausdorff realization).

[F2]

A homeomorphism is a continuous bijection with continuous inverse, and composites of continuous maps are continuous (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

Verification

1.1F1given

The increasing open disks {z:∣z∣<n} for positive integers n cover C, and no finite subfamily covers: a finite union of such disks is contained in the largest of them. Hence C is not compact, and by [F1] it is not homeomorphic to the realization of any finite simplicial complex.

1.2givenconstructalgebra

Let K be the boundary complex of the octahedron with vertices ±e1,±e2,±e3 and eight triangular faces, one for each choice of signs. Its realization is {x∈R3:∣x1∣+∣x2∣+∣x3∣=1}: every listed triangular face satisfies the equation and every point of the ℓ1-sphere lies in such a face. The radial normalization x↦x/∥x∥2 maps this realization bijectively onto the unit sphere S2, with inverse u↦u/(∣u1∣+∣u2∣+∣u3∣); both maps are continuous, so by [F2] it is a homeomorphism. Deleting the subcomplex consisting of the single vertex e3 identifies ∣K∣∖{e3} with S2∖{e3}.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

For (a,b)∈R2 put s=a2+b2 and map (a,b) to (2a,2b,s−1)/(s+1). Its squared Euclidean norm is (4s+(s−1)2)/(s+1)2=(s+1)2/(s+1)2=1, so the image lies on S2, and its third coordinate (s−1)/(s+1) is strictly less than 1. The map u↦(u1,u2)/(1−u3) is defined on S2∖{e3} and is inverse to the previous formula by direct substitution; both are continuous. Composing with the identification C≅R2 and with step 1.2 gives a homeomorphism C≅S2∖{e3}≅∣K∣∖{e3}, a finite triangulation with one boundary vertex deleted; step 1.1 shows that deleting a boundary simplex is necessary for a noncompact space.

Remarks

  • The example exhibits the deleted-boundary convention used by the finite triangulation statements of the companion page. It makes no claim about compactifications of higher-dimensional or singular varieties, and it does not assert that an arbitrary algebraic morphism becomes simplicial.

Sources