Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 4 also cleared it.

Fejer and Poisson Summability of Fourier Series - Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The companion page records the clean coefficient computations behind the two positive kernels, a standard square-wave summation example, and two boundary counterexamples: uniform convergence fails without continuity of the target representative, and Abel summability does not reverse to ordinary convergence.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Fejer means of a single character

Example

Let k∈Z. For every N≥0,

σNek=(1−∣k∣N+1)+ek.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer k and an integer N≥0.

[L1]

The Cesaro means are defined by σNf=1N+1∑j=0NSjf (Cesaro and Abel means of a Fourier series).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

The Fourier coefficients of ek vanish except at k, where the coefficient is 1. Hence Sjek={0,j<∣k∣,ek,j≥∣k∣.

2.1L1step 1.1algebra∎

If ∣k∣>N, then every term in the Cesaro average from [L1] is 0, so σNek=0. If ∣k∣≤N, then exactly N+1−∣k∣ of the terms equal ek, and therefore σNek=N+1−∣k∣N+1ek=(1−∣k∣N+1)ek. This is the same as the displayed (⋅)+ formula, and for N=0 it gives σ0e0=e0 and σ0ek=0 for k≠0.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Poisson integral of a single character

Example

Let k∈Z and 0≤r<1. Then

Arek=r∣k∣ek.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer k and a parameter r with 0≤r<1.

[L1]

The Abel means are defined by Arf(x)=∑m∈Zr∣m∣f^(m)em(x) (Cesaro and Abel means of a Fourier series).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

The Fourier coefficients of ek vanish except at k, where the coefficient is 1. Substituting into [L1] leaves only one term: Arek(x)=r∣k∣ek(x).

2.1step 1.1∎

Since step 1.1 holds for every x, it is exactly the asserted identity Arek=r∣k∣ek.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Fejer summation of the square wave

Example

Let q be the one-periodic square wave defined by

q(x)={1,0<x<1/2,−1,−1/2<x<0,

with q(0)=q(1/2)=0. Then

σNq(x)=4π∑m=0⌊(N−1)/2⌋(1−2m+1N+1)sin⁡(2π(2m+1)x)2m+1,

and

σNq(0)→0.

Moreover ∣σNq(x)∣≤1 for every x and every N, so these positive means recover the midpoint value without a fixed Gibbs overshoot.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-periodic square wave q above.

[L1]

The Cesaro means are defined by averaging Fourier partial sums (Cesaro and Abel means of a Fourier series).

[L2]

The Fejer kernels are nonnegative and have Riemann integral 1 (The Fejer kernel is a positive approximate identity).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

Direct integration gives q^(2m)=0 for every m and q^(2m+1)=2πi(2m+1),q^(−(2m+1))=−2πi(2m+1). Hence Sjq(x)=4π∑0≤m, 2m+1≤jsin⁡(2π(2m+1)x)2m+1.

2.1L1step 1.1algebra

Averaging the partial sums from step 1.1 as in [L1] shows that the odd mode 2m+1 appears with weight 1−(2m+1)/(N+1) when 2m+1≤N and with weight 0 otherwise. This is exactly the displayed formula for σNq.

3.1L1L2step 2.1algebra∎

Every term of the finite sine sum in step 2.1 vanishes at x=0, so σNq(0)=0 for every N. Also [L1] and [L2] give σNq(x)=∫01q(x−t)FN(t) dt, where the integral is Riemann because q is a step function. Since ∣q∣≤1, positivity and total mass one imply ∣σNq(x)∣≤1 for every x. Thus the Fejer means average across the jump and do not exhibit a fixed overshoot.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Fejer means need not converge uniformly for discontinuous data

Statement refuted

For every one-periodic integrable function f, the Fejer means σNf converge uniformly to f.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-periodic step function f(x):={1,0<x<1/2,0,−1/2<x<0, with f(0)=f(1/2)=0.

[L1]

The Fejer means are averages of the Fourier partial sums (Cesaro and Abel means of a Fourier series).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

For each N, the function Sjf is a trigonometric polynomial for every 0≤j≤N, so [L1] makes σNf a trigonometric polynomial as well. In particular, every σNf is continuous.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

If σNf converged uniformly to f, then the uniform limit of the continuous functions σNf would be continuous. But the chosen f has a jump at 0, so it is discontinuous. Therefore uniform convergence to f is impossible. This single step function refutes the universal statement.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Abel summability does not imply ordinary convergence

Statement refuted

If a series is Abel summable, then its ordinary partial sums converge.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Grandi's series 1−1+1−1+⋯ .

[F1]

For ∣r∣<1, the geometric-series identity gives 1−r+r2−r3+⋯=11+r.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The ordinary partial sums are 1,0,1,0,…, so they do not converge.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

For 0≤r<1, [F1] makes the associated Abel sum 1−r+r2−r3+⋯=11+r. As r↑1, this tends to 1/2. Thus the series is Abel summable but not ordinarily convergent, refuting the statement.

Sources