How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Group Homology Transfer and Low-Degree Exact Sequences: Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Derived Functors
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Cohomology as a Derived Functor
- Group Extensions Complements and Schur Zassenhaus
- Group Homology Transfer and Low-Degree Exact Sequences
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Semidirect Products, Automorphism Groups and Split Extensions
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
2 · Summary
A periodic free resolution calculates the integral homology of a finite cyclic group and verifies order annihilation. Its one-generator presentation gives a concrete five-term sequence. The integral Heisenberg extension supplies an explicit nonzero transgression cocycle and makes the chosen sign visible.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Integral homology of a finite cyclic group
Example
For , , with trivial integral coefficients, , for , and for . In particular multiplication by kills positive homology.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: m is a positive integer; coefficients are trivial integers; the derived-functor convention carries DC and supplied resolutions.
The order of a finite group annihilates its positive integral homology. (Positive integral homology is annihilated by the group order).
Group homology is the homology obtained by tensoring the supplied projective resolution with the right trivial module (Group homology as a derived functor).
Under DC, any two projective resolutions of the same object are chain-homotopy equivalent over that object (Projective resolutions of the same object are homotopy equivalent over that object).
Verification
Put and . Use one copy of R in each nonnegative degree, augmentation , differential multiplication by in odd degrees and by N in positive even degrees. Since and , this is an augmented chain complex.
For , the coefficient of in is (indices modulo m). Thus its kernel consists exactly of constant coefficient vectors, namely . Also , so the image of multiplication by N is and its kernel is . If , then . Hence , proving exactness in every degree. This also covers m=1: the two maps are zero and identity and the displayed sums are empty.
Each term is free, so step 2.1 makes this complex a projective resolution of the trivial left -module. Let be the supplied resolution used in [F2]. By [F3], and are chain-homotopy equivalent over . The additive functor carries the comparison maps and their homotopies to comparison maps and homotopies, so . Tensoring makes multiplication by zero and multiplication by N multiplication by m. Thus degree zero is , every odd degree has kernel modulo , and every positive even degree has kernel of , which is zero.
Multiplication by m on is zero, and on the zero groups it is zero. This explicitly verifies the conclusion of F1. Degree zero is excluded: in . For m=1 all positive groups vanish.
A cyclic presentation and its five-term sequence
Example
For , the presentation has kernel , and its five-term sequence is . Thus .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: m is a positive integer; F is the free group on one generator, written additively; use the inherited DC and supplied-resolution convention.
A free presentation gives an exact sequence with injection from H2 into R/[F,R] and the inclusion and quotient maps on abelianizations. (The free-presentation homology five-term sequence).
Verification
Every element of the free group on one generator has a unique integer exponent, so identify F with . Reduction modulo m is onto and has kernel . All elements of F commute, hence , , and . F1 therefore gives , where is the actual subgroup inclusion.
The inclusion has zero kernel. Exactness gives , while j is injective, so . Under the isomorphism , , the middle map becomes multiplication by m; its image is exactly the kernel of reduction modulo m. For m=1 this map is identity and the final quotient is zero.
The Heisenberg transgression and its sign
Example
Give the product . For the central extension and trivial coefficients , the transgression of , , is represented by and is nonzero. The displayed section and cochains suffice for this concrete calculation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: E, A and d are as in the example; use the DHW normalizer-quotient sign convention.
For invariant d and chosen alpha, eta the normalizer quotient has factor cocycle eta(q)+alpha(q)eta(r)-f(q,r)eta(qr)-d(f(q,r)); its construction works with supplied choices. (Low-degree transgression for a group extension).
The factor set of a supplied normalized section represents its extension; a normalized two-coboundary is b(q)+q b(r)-b(qr). (Bar two-cocycles classify abelian-kernel extensions).
Verification
For triples with first two coordinates (a,b), (u,v), (x,y), the extra central terms in the two associative products are and , which are equal. The identity is (0,0,0) and the inverse of (a,b,c) is by multiplication on both sides. Projection onto the first two coordinates is an onto homomorphism with central kernel . Thus these formulas really give the stated group extension.
The action on A is trivial and N is central, so d is a crossed homomorphism and conjugation fixes it. Choose and . They are normalized and . Multiplication gives , so the factor set, as an element of N identified with , is . F1 yields , not f. These explicit maps supply every choice required for this instance of F1 and F2.
The cochain F vanishes if either input is zero. Its cocycle identity is for the three inputs in step 1.1. With trivial action on the abelian quotient, every coboundary has the form and is symmetric in q,r. But , whereas . Thus F is not a coboundary and its class is nonzero.
Sources
- Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Calculation 6.2.1, Theorem 6.2.2 and Example 6.2.3, pp.167–168
- Loh, Group Cohomology, Definitions 1.7.12–13 and Theorem 1.7.15 pp.63–64; Theorem 3.2.18 pp.129–132
- Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 6, Sections 6.4–6.8
- Dekimpe–Hartl–Wauters, A seven-term exact sequence for the cohomology of a group extension, Sections 2–5 pp.2–11 and Section 10.2 p.21