Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

6 results · all verified · 6 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 6 also cleared it.

Hall–Mal’cev Coordinates and Bass–Guivarc’h Growth: Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Explicit lattice and matrix calculations give growth degrees for free abelian groups, the integer Heisenberg group, and UT4(Z). Central commutator words exhibit quadratic distortion. The final witnesses show why higher-layer weights and finite residue coordinates cannot be discarded.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Free abelian groups have degree equal to rank

Example

For G=Zd with d0, D(G)=d. Standard word balls have size bounded above and below by positive multiples of nd for n1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: For d>0 use the standard basis as generators; for d=0 use the empty generating set of the trivial group.

[F1]

A finitely generated nilpotent group has two-sided polynomial ball bounds of degree D (The Bass–Guivarc’h growth degree formula).

[F2]

D is the sum of i times the free rank of layer i (Bass–Guivarc’h dimension and nilpotent Hirsch length).

Verification

1.1

Addition in Zd is commutative, so γ2=1. Its only nonzero lower-central rank is r1=d, hence D=d. The standard basis is a finite generating set, and the group is nilpotent of class one when d>0, so F1 applies.

F1F2
2.1

For an integer vector a, each generator letter changes one coordinate by 1 in absolute value. Thus any representing word has at least jaj letters; writing each coordinate power attains that number. Consequently [n/d,n/d]dZdB(n)[n,n]dZd for d>0. For n>=d, the left cube has at least (n/d)d points, and the right has at most (3n)d. For 1n<d the ball contains 1 and (n/d)d<=1, so these bounds persist.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

For d=0 there is one empty vector, the empty word has length zero, and every ball has size 1. The dimension is the empty sum 0 and n0=1. Thus the degree and both estimates include the zero-dimensional case.

F2step 2.1

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Geometric Group Theory (837-page edition), Theorem 14.26 abelian base, p.511. Revised Theorem 14.26 abelian base is accompanied here by the explicit lattice interval calculation.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The discrete Heisenberg group has growth degree four

Example

Let H=UT3(Z), writing (a,b,c) for the matrix with entries a at (1,2), b at (2,3), and c at (1,3). Then γ2(H)={(0,0,c):cZ}, γ3(H)=1, Z(H)=γ2(H), r1=2, r2=1, and D(H)=4. Its word balls for any finite generating set have degree four.

The explicit laws are (a,b,c)(a,b,c)=(a+a,b+b,c+c+ab) and [(a,b,c),(a,b,c)]=(0,0,abab). With x=(1,0,0), y=(0,1,0), z=(0,0,1), one has [x,y]=z and the unique ordered form xaybzk=(a,b,ab+k).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Use matrix multiplication and the commutator convention [u,v]=uvu1v1.

[F1]

A finitely generated nilpotent group has ball growth degree D (The Bass–Guivarc’h growth degree formula).

[F2]

D is the weighted sum of lower-central ranks (Bass–Guivarc’h dimension and nilpotent Hirsch length).

Verification

1.1

Matrix multiplication gives (a,b,c)(a,b,c)=(a+a,b+b,c+c+ab). The identity is (0,0,0), and substitution on both sides gives (a,b,c)1=(a,b,c+ab). Put x=(1,0,0), y=(0,1,0), z=(0,0,1). Their integer powers satisfy xaybzk=(a,b,ab+k), so every matrix is uniquely xaybzcab.

givenalgebra
2.1

Using the product and inverse formulas gives [(a,b,c),(a,b,c)]=(0,0,abab). In particular [x,y]=z. Every commutator is a power of z and z itself is a commutator, so [H,H]=z. Elements (0,0,c) commute with every triple by the product rule, hence γ3=1. Conversely, if (a,b,c) commutes with x and y, its commutators have central entries b and a, so a=b=0. Thus the center is exactly z. Since z has infinite order, H has class exactly two. The elements x,y generate because z=[x,y] and step 1.1 gives every matrix.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The homomorphism (a,b,c)(a,b) is onto Z2 with kernel z, while c(0,0,c) identifies the kernel with Z. Thus r1=2 and r2=1, giving D=12+21=4. F1 applies because x,y are finite generators and H has class two. The identity has a=b=k=0; the matrix entry c equals ab+k and is not generally the normal coordinate k.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Lectures on Geometric Group Theory (585-page draft), Exercise 10.30, p.282; Example 5.3.7 in Löh. Draft Exercise 10.30 and Löh Example 5.3.7 support the example; the matrix law, normal form and both lower-central inclusions are calculated here.

Clara Löh, Geometric Group Theory, SS 2022, Theorem 5.3.6 and Example 5.3.7, printed p.140; general proof omitted. This independently supports the statement, not the omitted general proof.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The Heisenberg center is quadratically distorted

Example

In the integer Heisenberg group with horizontal generators x,y and central z=[x,y], mzmx,y12m for every nonzero integer m, and z0=0. Therefore the distortion of the center is quadratic.

For all integers a,b, the explicit commutator identity is [xa,yb]=zab.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Use the triples and generators of the preceding Heisenberg example, and intrinsic generator z for its center.

[F1]

The product law is (a,b,c)(a,b,c)=(a+a,b+b,c+c+ab) and z generates the center (The discrete Heisenberg group has growth degree four).

[F2]

An infinite last term in a class-two group has quadratic distortion (Both bounds for last-term weighted distortion).

Verification

1.1

For integers a,b the commutator formula gives [xa,yb]=zab. For m1 put q=m and write m=aq+r with 0r<q and 0aq. Then [xa,yq][xr,y]=zaq+r=zm. Its length is at most 2a+2q+2r+26q. Since qm+12m for m1, this is at most 12m. In particular m=1 gives the word [x,y] of length four. Thus the stated upper bound holds.

F1algebra
1.2

For a horizontal word of length n let (a_j,b_j,c_j) be the prefix value after j letters, starting at zero. Multiplication by x or its inverse changes only a by 1; multiplication by y or its inverse changes b by 1 and changes c by plus or minus the preceding a. Therefore ajj and cnj=0n1j=n(n1)/2n2. If the word represents z^m, its final c is m, so mn2 and nm.

F1algebra
2.1

Invert the word of step 1.1 for negative m; it represents z^m with unchanged length. At m=0 use the empty word. Intrinsically zmz=m, since the exponent sum of an intrinsic n-letter word has absolute value at most n and m identical signed letters attain |m|. Thus Δ(n)n2. For n18 choose m=(n/12)2; then mn2/288 and the upper length bound puts z^m in B(n). Hence n2/288Δ(n)n2 for n18. This also verifies the hypotheses and conclusion of F2, since the center is infinite and equals gamma_2.

F2step 1.1step 1.2

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Lectures on Geometric Group Theory (585-page draft), Corollary 12.39, pp.322–323; Heisenberg specialization. Draft Corollary 12.39 is specialized to a directly calculated rectangular commutator word; the lower estimate is obtained from the prefix matrix recurrence.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

UT_4(Z) has ranks three, two, one and growth degree ten

Example

For G=UT4(Z), the subgroup γi(G) consists of matrices whose superdiagonals of distance less than i vanish. The successive free ranks are 3,2,1, giving h=6 and D=10, and every finite word metric has degree-ten ball growth.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Write Tij(a)=I+aEij for 1i<j4 and a integer.

[F1]

Finitely generated nilpotent groups have degree D ball growth (The Bass–Guivarc’h growth degree formula).

[F2]

Lower-central commutators add weights (Lower-central commutators add weights).

[F3]

h and D are the unweighted and weighted rank sums (Bass–Guivarc’h dimension and nilpotent Hirsch length).

Verification

1.1

The matrix-unit rule is EijEkl=δjkEil. Hence Tij(a)1=Tij(a), Tij(a)Tij(b)=Tij(a+b), and for i<j<k direct expansion yields [Tij(a),Tjk(b)]=Tik(ab). In that expansion the only surviving cross product is abEik, since Eij2=Ejk2=EjkEij=0.

givenalgebra
2.1

The ordered product T12(a)T23(b)T34(c)T13(d)T24(e)T14(f) has entries (12,23,34,13,24,14) equal to (a,b,c,ab+d,bc+e,abc+ae+f). Given entries (A,B,C,D,E,F), the unique exponents are a=A,b=B,c=C,d=DAB,e=EBC,f=FAE. Thus this is a six-integer normal form. The three adjacent transvections with parameter 1 generate: step 1.1 gives T_13(1), T_24(1), and then T_14(1), and all integer powers give every factor.

step 1.1algebra
2.2

Let J_i be the additive group of strictly upper triangular matrices supported at distances at least i, with J_4=0. Matrix-unit multiplication gives JiJjJi+j. The groups Fi=1+Ji are closed under multiplication and inversion, since (1+u)1=1u+u2u3. In the quotient ring by Ji+j, the images of u in J_i and v in J_j have both uv=vu=0, so 1+u and 1+v commute. It follows that [Fi,Fj]Fi+j. Since G=F_1, induction gives γi(G)Fi.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Conversely F_2 is generated by T_13(1), T_24(1), T_14(1), with arbitrary integer powers: its first superdiagonal is zero and the product has precisely those three independent remaining entries. The first two are adjacent commutators by step 1.1. The third is [T13(1),T34(1)]; since T_13(1) is in gamma_2, F2 places this commutator in gamma_3, hence also gamma_2. Therefore F2γ2 and F3=T14(1)γ3. Along with step 2.2, this gives γ2=F2, γ3=F3, γ4=1.

F2step 1.1step 2.2
4.1

Taking the entries on superdiagonal i is an onto homomorphism FiZ4i with kernel Fi+1: cross products have strictly greater distance. Hence the ranks are 3,2,1; gamma_3 is nontrivial, so the class is three. Thus h=3+2+1=6 and D=13+22+31=10. Apply F1 using the three explicit finite generators in step 2.1. All six zero exponents give I.

F1F3step 2.1step 3.1

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Lectures on Geometric Group Theory (585-page draft), Exercise 10.30, p.282, specialized to n=4 and Z. Draft Exercise 10.30 is specialized to integer 4-by-4 matrices, with both subgroup inclusions and the six-entry normal form calculated.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Hirsch length and growth degree differ

Example

The nilpotent Hirsch length and growth degree need not agree: for the integer Heisenberg group H, h(H)=3 and D(H)=4; for UT4(Z), h=6 and D=10.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Use the ranks computed in the two matrix examples.

[F1]

The Heisenberg lower-central ranks are 2,1 (The discrete Heisenberg group has growth degree four).

[F2]

The UT_4 lower-central ranks are 3,2,1 (UT_4(Z) has ranks three, two, one and growth degree ten).

[F3]

h sums ranks and D sums ranks multiplied by their layer (Bass–Guivarc’h dimension and nilpotent Hirsch length).

Verification

1.1

For H, the factor ranks (2,1) give h=2+1=3 and D=12+21=4. Their difference is (21)1=1, contributed by the central second-layer free generator.

F1F3
2.1

For UT4(Z) the ranks (3,2,1) give h=3+2+1=6 and D=13+22+31=10. The difference is (21)2+(31)1=4. Thus h counts each free coordinate once, while D records its lower-central layer; these two explicit nilpotent groups have different values of the two invariants.

F2F3algebra

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Geometric Group Theory (837-page edition), Definition 13.46, p.474. Revised Definition 13.46 supplies the distinction between the two sums; actual factor calculations are cited at their uses.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Weight-one counting misses Heisenberg growth

Statement refuted

The claim that every independent lower-central coordinate in every word ball of a finitely generated nilpotent group has range bounded linearly in the radius is false. Counting all such coordinates with weight one can therefore give the wrong polynomial degree.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Use H with horizontal generators x,y, central z=[x,y], and unique normal form x^a y^b z^k.

[F1]

H has three independent normal coordinates and growth degree four (The discrete Heisenberg group has growth degree four).

[F2]

[xa,yb]=zab, with central exponent attainable at length O(sqrt of its absolute value) (The Heisenberg center is quadratically distorted).

Counterexample

1.1

For every integer N1 the explicit word [xN,yN]=xNyNxNyN=zN2 has length at most 4N. Its normal coordinate tuple is (0,0,N^2), since the ordered form is unique. Hence the central coordinate in B(4N) can equal N^2.

F1F2
2.1

If a fixed linear bound kCn held in every ball B(n), step 1.1 would imply N24CN for every positive integer N. Taking any integer N>4C contradicts this. Thus the claimed uniform linear bound fails. Moreover H has three independent coordinates but ball growth degree four by F1, so the predicted degree three from weight-one counting is false; positive multiples of n^4 cannot be bounded above by a fixed multiple of n^3 as n grows.

F1step 1.1

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Lectures on Geometric Group Theory (585-page draft), Corollary 12.39 and Theorem 12.48, pp.322–323,328–329. Draft Corollary 12.39 supplies the central compression phenomenon. The actual refutation uses a concrete commutator word and quantifies against every possible linear constant.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Torsion-free does not mean torsion-free lower-central factors

Statement refuted

False claim: every lower-central factor of a torsion-free nilpotent group is torsion-free.

For each fixed integer p2, the subgroup G={(a,pb,c):a,b,cZ} of the integer Heisenberg group refutes this claim: it is torsion-free and has G/[G,G]Z2Z/pZ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Use the Heisenberg triple multiplication; p is a fixed integer at least two.

[F1]

The triple product has central coordinate c+c prime+a b prime and commutator central coordinate a b prime-a prime b (The discrete Heisenberg group has growth degree four).

[F2]

Mixed lower-central coordinates retain finite cyclic residue coordinates even when the group is torsion-free (Finite lower-central coordinate systems with torsion accounted for).

Counterexample

1.1

The product of (a,pb,c) and (a prime,pb prime,c prime) is (a+a,p(b+b),c+c+pab), and the inverse is (a,pb,c+pab). Thus G is a subgroup. Set x=(1,0,0), y=(0,p,0), z=(0,0,1). Then xaybzk=(a,pb,pab+k), giving a unique normal form and a finite generating list x,y,z.

F1algebra
2.1

Commutators are (0,0,p(abab)), and [x,y]=zp. Thus [G,G]=zp: every commutator lies there and z^p is a commutator. This subgroup is central and nontrivial, so G is nilpotent of class two. The map ψ(a,pb,c)=(a,b,cmodp) is an onto homomorphism to Z2Z/pZ, since the extra product term pab prime vanishes modulo p. Its kernel is exactly zp. The induced quotient map is therefore a bijective homomorphism, with injectivity given by this kernel calculation.

F1step 1.1
3.1

For a positive integer m, repeated multiplication gives (a,pb,c)m=(ma,mpb,mc+pabm(m1)/2); induction follows by adding c+p(ma)b at the next multiplication. If this power is the identity, ma=mpb=0 forces a=b=0, and then mc=0 forces c=0. Hence every nonidentity element has infinite order. Nevertheless z[G,G] has order exactly p: z^j belongs to <z^p> exactly when p divides j. Since p2, this is nontrivial torsion in the abelianization.

step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

For the mixed lower-central form choose first-layer lifts x,y,z, with the z exponent reduced to a residue r in {0,...,p-1}, and second-layer generator z^p. For a normal exponent k divide k=pq+r; then xaybzk=xaybzr(zp)q. The identity is the zero tuple. Thus the p-th power of the finite factor lift is a nontrivial carry into layer two, exactly as retained by F2. Setting p=1 would remove the torsion and is explicitly excluded.

F2step 1.1step 3.1

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Geometric Group Theory (837-page edition), Remark 13.83(2), p.484. Revised Remark 13.83(2) supplies this family. The subgroup, torsion-free power calculation, exact commutator subgroup and quotient map are all verified locally.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources