How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Socles and the Onan Scott Landscape — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Blocks Primitivity and Multiple Transitivity
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Conjugacy in Sₙ, Generation, and the Simplicity of Aₙ
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Frattini Subgroups and the Burnside Basis Theorem
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Semidirect Products, Automorphism Groups and Split Extensions
- Socles and the Onan Scott Landscape
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
These examples supply concrete witnesses for each coarse O'Nan-Scott branch and for the two basic warnings of the page: a primitive group can have two minimal normal subgroups, and transitivity without primitivity does not force a minimal normal subgroup to be transitive.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The natural action of AGL(1,p) is affine type
Example
Let be prime. The natural action of on the set is of affine type.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The semidirect product action of on .
A faithful primitive group with a unique abelian minimal normal subgroup is of affine type (A unique abelian minimal normal subgroup gives affine type).
The translation subgroup is normal, abelian, and regular on .
Verification
The translation subgroup is elementary abelian of order and acts regularly by .
Let be nontrivial. If , then because has prime order. If , then the image of in the quotient is nontrivial; choose with . For any , the commutator lies in , contradiction. So every nontrivial normal subgroup contains , and is the unique minimal normal subgroup.
Therefore [L1] applies, and the natural action of is of affine type.
The natural action of is almost simple type
Example
For , the natural action of on is of almost simple type.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and the natural action of on .
A finite group is almost simple when it lies between a nonabelian simple group and its automorphism group (Almost simple finite groups).
For , the alternating group is nonabelian simple.
Verification
The acting group is itself, and [A1] makes it a nonabelian simple group. Thus , so [L1] shows that is almost simple.
In the natural primitive action, the socle is therefore itself, and this is the almost-simple branch of the O'Nan-Scott dictionary.
A simple diagonal action
Example
Let be a nonabelian finite simple group. The action of on the right cosets of the diagonal subgroup
is the basic diagonal-type example.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonabelian finite simple group and the coset action of on .
In this action the socle is , and the diagonal subgroup identifies the two factors in the stabilizer.
The diagonal branch of the O'Nan-Scott dictionary is one of the five primitive socle types (Affine, almost simple, diagonal, product action, and twisted wreath types).
Verification
The socle of the acting group is , a direct product of two isomorphic nonabelian simple factors, and the point stabilizer is the diagonal subgroup by construction. This stabilizer is maximal: if , choose . Multiplying by gives with . Conjugation by and simplicity of then give , and . Thus .
A coset action is primitive exactly when its stabilizer is maximal, so step 1.1 makes this action primitive. Its socle and stabilizer are then exactly the defining features in [L1], and the action is a simple diagonal action.
A primitive product-action wreath product
Example
Let acting naturally on and let act on two coordinates. Then is primitive on and is of O'Nan--Scott product-action type.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard product action of on .
Under the standard hypotheses, product-action wreath products are primitive (Product-action wreath products are primitive under the standard hypotheses).
Product action is one of the five coarse O'Nan-Scott types (Affine, almost simple, diagonal, product action, and twisted wreath types).
Verification
The action of on five points is primitive and not regular, and the action of on the two coordinates is transitive. Therefore [L1] applies to on .
The socle of the wreath product is , which is nonabelian and acts coordinatewise. Thus the action is primitive and has the product-action socle data in [L2], rather than affine socle data.
A primitive group with two regular minimal normal subgroups
Example
Primitive groups with two regular minimal normal subgroups do exist; the standard diagonal-type examples provide them.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A standard faithful diagonal-type primitive action with socle for a nonabelian finite simple group .
In this action the left and right regular copies of are distinct minimal normal subgroups.
Distinct minimal normal subgroups of a finite faithful primitive group are regular (Two distinct minimal normal subgroups of a primitive group are regular).
Verification
The diagonal-type witness has two distinct minimal normal subgroups by [A1].
Applying [L1] to those two subgroups shows that both are regular. This is exactly the exceptional case allowed by the socle analysis.
The socle of a finite solvable primitive group is elementary abelian and regular
Example
If is finite, solvable, faithful, primitive, and of degree at least , then its socle is the unique regular elementary abelian minimal normal subgroup.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite solvable faithful primitive permutation group of degree at least .
In a finite solvable primitive group of degree at least , a minimal normal subgroup is elementary abelian and regular.
In a finite solvable primitive group of degree at least , that minimal normal subgroup is unique.
Verification
Let be a minimal normal subgroup of . The primitive-solvable fact [A1] shows that is elementary abelian and regular.
The uniqueness statement [A2] says that this minimal normal subgroup is the only one.
The socle is generated by the minimal normal subgroups, so with uniqueness from step 2.1 it equals . Therefore the socle of is the unique regular elementary abelian minimal normal subgroup.
A transitive imprimitive action can have a nontransitive minimal normal subgroup
Statement refuted
The theorem Minimal normal subgroups of faithful primitive groups are transitive requires primitivity. Mere transitivity does not force a minimal normal subgroup to be transitive.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonabelian finite simple group and the action of on the disjoint union of two copies of , where acts by left regular action on each copy and swaps the two copies.
This action is transitive because the swapping involution exchanges the two blocks, but it is imprimitive because the two copies of form a nontrivial block system.
The subgroup is a minimal normal subgroup of the full semidirect product, and it preserves each block setwise.
Counterexample
By [A1], the action is transitive and imprimitive.
By [A2], the subgroup is minimal normal, but because preserves each copy of setwise, it has two orbits and is therefore not transitive.
Hence a transitive action can have a nontransitive minimal normal subgroup once primitivity is dropped.