Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 3 also cleared it.

BV, BRST, and Homological Physics Interfaces

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page gives a degree-+1 BV convention, proves the induced odd Poisson identities, distinguishes the classical and formal quantum master equations, and constructs a classical BRST complex from a Lie algebra acting on an algebra by derivations. Every item remains draft pending the native review and gates.

Companion: bv-brst-and-homological-physics-interfaces-examples.

Reading prerequisites

The reading route is a-infinity-l-infinity-and-deformation-complexes, which fixes cohomological and Koszul conventions and supplies degreewise complete filtered shifted L∞ Maurer–Cartan and gauge theory. The BV items state and prove their own degree-+1 bracket convention. Their proofs do not invoke an L∞ identity or deformation-classification theorem. The transitive dg-and-homological-algebra-foundations route fixes the ordinary degree-one DGA convention; its differential is a derivation, whereas a BV operator is separately required to have order at most two.

The formal quantum master equation here allows a nonzero constant coefficient S0. Under the displayed normalization w=iSℏ/ℏ, it is equivalent in A((ℏ)) to Δw+12{w,w}=0. The filtered Maurer–Cartan convergence theorem on the A∞/L∞ route requires a characteristic-zero shifted L∞ structure with a degreewise complete separated filtration satisfying qn(Fr1W,…,FrnW)⊆Fr1+⋯+rnW, and a degree-zero input w∈F1W0. For the ℏ-adic filtration FrW=ℏrW on the shifted coefficient carrier identified with A[ ⁣[ℏ] ⁣], this requires Sℏ∈ℏ2A[ ⁣[ℏ] ⁣]: mere membership in ℏA[ ⁣[ℏ] ⁣] can leave a nonzero constant term in w, while nonzero S0 makes w Laurent. The algebraic normalization alone supplies no filtered convergence or gauge-classification conclusion. If Sℏ=S0+ℏS1+⋯ and S0 satisfies the CME, the coefficient of ℏ in the QME is {S0,S1}−iΔS0=0. Thus −iΔS0 is the curvature contribution after factoring out ℏ, and −iℏΔS0 is the corresponding term in the undivided QME. The local master-equation results retain their stated scope.

BV algebra and master equations

BV algebra with a degree-one generator fixes a graded-commutative algebra, degree-+1 square-zero operator, graded-commutator definition of order at most two, and the derived bracket. Its full proof of odd skew, biderivation, and odd Jacobi is The derived BV bracket is an odd Poisson bracket.

Classical and formal quantum master equations separates the classical master equation from one explicit formal QME normalization. The QME is an ℏ-adic identity only; it does not assert a path-integral measure, convergence, renormalization, or anomaly cancellation. Under the CME, the Hamiltonian operation {S,−} is a square-zero degree-+1 differential by A classical master solution defines a square-zero differential.

Classical Lie-action BRST model

Classical Lie-action BRST cochain complex specializes the Chevalley–Eilenberg cochains to a fixed Lie algebra acting on a commutative algebra by derivations. The action must be a Lie algebra representation; the local bridge The classical Lie-action BRST differential squares to zero proves nilpotence and defines its cohomology quotient using the current published Chevalley–Eilenberg square-zero theorem.

This model covers a genuine Lie algebra action with constant structure coefficients. It makes no claim for field-dependent structure functions, reducible or open gauge algebras, the full BFV/Koszul–Tate construction, or quantum BRST cohomology.

Conventions and source limits

The authoring convention follows the BV degree and master-equation clauses in the definition and diagram contracts and the BV/BRST prerequisite notes. Getzler supplies the degree-+1 source convention; the cited degree-−1 and Z/2 treatments are comparison sources only. Their bracket formulas are not imported without translation.

The source inventory is a planning record, not proof acceptance. The current plan entry and original proposal retain the same PA-13 page IDs, category, and reading route; their empty item arrays supplied no item-level logical dependencies. See the batch notes for the plan comparison and source dispositions.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

BV algebra with a degree-one generator

Definition

Let k be a field of characteristic 0. A unital Z-graded associative k-algebra A=⨁r∈ZAr is graded commutative when its unit 1 has degree 0 and homogeneous a,b satisfy ab=(−1)∣a∣∣b∣ba. A linear map Δ:Ar→Ar+1 is a BV generator of degree +1 when Δ(1)=0, Δ2=0, and it has order at most two in the following graded-commutator convention. For homogeneous operators P,Q, set [P,Q]=PQ−(−1)∣P∣∣Q∣QP, and for homogeneous a∈A let ma(x)=ax. The order condition is [[[Δ,ma],mb],mc]=0 for all homogeneous a,b,c∈A. The pair (A,Δ) with these data is a BV algebra in the degree-+1 convention. Its derived bracket is the bilinear operation of degree +1 {a,b}=(−1)∣a∣(Δ(ab)−(Δa)b−(−1)∣a∣aΔb) on homogeneous elements, extended by linearity.

This item fixes the grading, commutator order condition, and bracket formula. It does not include a separate differential Q or assert compatibility with one. The associated odd-skew, biderivation, and Jacobi identities are proved in The derived BV bracket is an odd Poisson bracket.

Remarks

Getzler writes the second-order condition as a seven-term identity and also includes a separate differential in his larger structure. Seidel uses a degree-−1 operator, and Kosmann-Schwarzbach–Monterde formulate the general odd bracket first in a Z/2-graded setting. This item fixes its own degree-+1 commutator and bracket conventions; no result in a different grading is imported without a conversion.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Classical Lie-action BRST cochain complex

Definition

Let k be a characteristic-zero field, let g be a Lie algebra over k, and let A be a unital commutative k-algebra. A classical Lie-action BRST input is a Lie algebra homomorphism ρ:g→End⁡k(A) whose values are derivations: for x∈g and a,b∈A, ρ(x)(ab)=ρ(x)(a)b+aρ(x)(b),ρ(x)(1)=0. In particular, A is a g-module, so its Chevalley–Eilenberg cochains are CBRSTn(g,A)=Hom⁡k(Λng,A)(n≥0), and are zero for n<0. Define the degree-+1 classical Lie-action BRST operator by the fixed zero-based formula (dBRSTf)(x0,…,xn)=∑i=0n(−1)iρ(xi)f(x0,…,xi^,…,xn)+∑0≤i<j≤n(−1)i+jf([xi,xj],x0,…,xi^,…,xj^,…,xn). A hat denotes omission; the bracket is inserted first. This is exactly the Chevalley–Eilenberg differential for the stated representation, with the BRST name reserved here for this classical Lie-action model.

Its square-zero property and the resulting quotient cohomology are established in The classical Lie-action BRST differential squares to zero. This model does not claim a Koszul–Tate resolution, a BFV charge for arbitrary first-class constraints, reducible or open gauge algebras, field-dependent structure functions, or quantum BRST cohomology.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The derived BV bracket is an odd Poisson bracket

Statement

Let (A,Δ) be as in BV algebra with a degree-one generator. For homogeneous a,b,c∈A, the derived bracket has degree ∣{a,b}∣=∣a∣+∣b∣+1 and satisfies {a,b}=−(−1)(∣a∣+1)(∣b∣+1){b,a}, {a,bc}={a,b}c+(−1)(∣a∣+1)∣b∣b{a,c}, and {a,{b,c}}={{a,b},c}+(−1)(∣a∣+1)(∣b∣+1){b,{a,c}}. Thus it is an odd Poisson bracket, meaning an odd-skew bracket that is a derivation in each argument and satisfies the displayed odd Jacobi identity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A degree-+1 BV generator Δ on a graded-commutative algebra A over a field of characteristic 0, and homogeneous a,b,c∈A.

[F1]

BV algebra with a degree-one generator: Δ(1)=0, Δ2=0, [[[Δ,ma],mb],mc]=0, and {a,b}=(−1)∣a∣(Δ(ab)−(Δa)b−(−1)∣a∣aΔb).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

Put m=∣a∣, n=∣b∣, δa=[Δ,ma], and Ta,b=[δa,mb]. By [F1], [Ta,b,mc]=0 for every homogeneous c, so Ta,b(c)=(−1)∣Ta,b∣∣c∣cTa,b(1)=Ta,b(1)c; the two signs cancel by graded commutativity, hence Ta,b=mTa,b(1). Direct evaluation gives Ta,b(1)=Δ(ab)−(−1)maΔb−(−1)(m+1)nbΔa=Δ(ab)−(−1)maΔb−(Δa)b=(−1)m{a,b}. Thus [δa,mb]=m(−1)m{a,b}.

1.2F1algebra

Graded commutativity expands the defining formula to {b,a}=(−1)n+mnΔ(ab)−(−1)n+mn+maΔb−(−1)mn+n(Δa)b. Multiplication by −(−1)(m+1)(n+1) reduces these coefficients, modulo 2, to (−1)m, −1, and −(−1)m, respectively, giving exactly {a,b}. Each term of the bracket formula has degree ∣a∣+∣b∣+1. This proves odd skew-symmetry and the degree assertion.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Define Ha=δa−mΔa. Then Ha(1)=0 and [Ha,mb]=m(−1)m{a,b} by step 1.1 because multiplication operators gradedly commute. Evaluating at 1 gives Ha(b)=(−1)m{a,b}; evaluating at homogeneous c gives Ha(bc)−(−1)(m+1)nbHa(c)=Ha(b)c. Multiplying by (−1)m proves {a,bc}={a,b}c+(−1)(m+1)nb{a,c}.

2.2F1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Expansion of the graded commutators gives [Δ,[Δ,mb]]=[Δ2,mb]=0 and [δa,δb]=[Δ,[ma,δb]], because the other graded-Jacobi term is a signed multiple of [ma,[Δ,δb]]=0. By step 1.1 and odd skew-symmetry from step 1.2, [ma,δb]=−(−1)m(n+1)[δb,ma]=−m{a,b}, so [δa,δb]=−[Δ,m{a,b}].

2.3F1step 1.1algebra

Rearranging the defining bracket gives Δ(uv)=(Δu)v+(−1)∣u∣uΔv+(−1)∣u∣{u,v}. Apply this to (Δa)b and a(Δb) when expanding Δ{a,b}; the two (Δa)(Δb) terms cancel and Δ2=0 leaves Δ{a,b}={Δa,b}−(−1)m{a,Δb}.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

By steps 1.2 and 2.1, express {ab,c}=−(−1)(∣a∣+∣b∣+1)(∣c∣+1){c,ab}, expand {c,ab} by the derivation rule, and use odd skew-symmetry on the two terms; reducing exponents modulo 2 gives {ab,c}=a{b,c}+(−1)∣b∣(∣c∣+1){a,c}b. Hence the bracket is also a derivation in its first argument and is a biderivation.

4.1F1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.2step 2.3algebra∎

Expanding [Ha,Hb] using steps 1.1 and 2.2 gives [Ha,Hb]=−[Δ,m{a,b}]−(−1)mm{a,Δb}+(−1)(m+1)(n+1)+nm{b,Δa}. By step 1.2, {Δa,b}=−(−1)m(n+1){b,Δa}, and the last coefficient equals −(−1)m(n+1); step 2.3 therefore makes the last two terms mΔ{a,b}, so [Ha,Hb]=−H{a,b}. Thus Da={a,−}=(−1)mHa satisfies [Da,Db]=(−1)m+n+1H{a,b}=D{a,b}; applying this to c and rearranging is the stated odd Jacobi identity.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Classical and formal quantum master equations

Definition

Let (A,Δ) be a BV algebra in the degree-+1 convention of BV algebra with a degree-one generator, with derived bracket {−,−}. For an element S∈A0, the classical master equation (CME) is {S,S}=0.

For a formal version, take A over C, let ℏ be a central formal variable of degree 0, and write A[ ⁣[ℏ] ⁣] for formal power series with the Cauchy product. Extend Δ and {−,−} coefficientwise. For Sℏ∈A0[ ⁣[ℏ] ⁣], the formal quantum master equation (QME) in the convention used here is 12{Sℏ,Sℏ}−iℏΔSℏ=0 as an equality in A1[ ⁣[ℏ] ⁣], checked coefficientwise. Each coefficient uses only a finite Cauchy sum, so this is a formal algebraic condition and requires no analytic convergence.

Remarks

Kosmann-Schwarzbach–Monterde write a corresponding Maurer–Cartan equation as Δw+12{w,w}=0. Where w=iSℏ/ℏ is formed in the Laurent-series extension, multiplying that equation by −ℏ2 gives the QME displayed here. This scalar substitution is only a normalization conversion. Neither equation defines a measure, proves a renormalization claim, or by itself establishes anomaly cancellation. The CME differential consequence is proved in A classical master solution defines a square-zero differential.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The classical Lie-action BRST differential squares to zero

Statement

For every classical Lie-action BRST input of Classical Lie-action BRST cochain complex and every n≥0, dBRSTn+1dBRSTn=0. Consequently, the quotient HBRSTn(g,A):=ker⁡(dBRSTn)/im⁡(dBRSTn−1) is a well-defined vector space, with CBRST−1=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A characteristic-zero field k, a Lie algebra g, a unital commutative k-algebra A, and a Lie algebra representation of g on A by derivations.

[F1]

Classical Lie-action BRST cochain complex: the BRST cochains are Hom⁡k(Λng,A) and the operator is the zero-based two-sum Chevalley–Eilenberg formula for the representation ρ.

[F2]

The Chevalley–Eilenberg differential squares to zero: for a Lie algebra over a field and a representation on a module, the displayed Chevalley–Eilenberg differential satisfies dn+1dn=0 for every n.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

The assumptions in [F1] make A a g-module because ρ is a Lie algebra homomorphism, so [ρ(x),ρ(y)]=ρ([x,y]). The cochain spaces and both signed sums in dBRST are term-by-term those in [F2].

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1

Therefore [F2] applies to these exact inputs and gives dBRSTn+1dBRSTn=0 for every n≥0.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra∎

If z∈im⁡(dBRSTn−1), write z=dBRSTn−1w. Step 2.1 gives dBRSTnz=dBRSTndBRSTn−1w=0, so the image is contained in the kernel and the displayed quotient is well-defined.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A classical master solution defines a square-zero differential

Statement

Let (A,Δ) be as in BV algebra with a degree-one generator, and let S∈A0 satisfy the classical master equation in Classical and formal quantum master equations. Then dS:A→A, dS(a)={S,a}, has degree +1 and satisfies dS2=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A BV algebra over a characteristic-zero field, an element S∈A0, and the CME {S,S}=0.

[F1]

Classical and formal quantum master equations: the classical master equation for a degree-zero element S is {S,S}=0.

[F2]

The derived BV bracket is an odd Poisson bracket: the bracket has degree +1 and satisfies {a,{b,c}}={{a,b},c}+(−1)(∣a∣+1)(∣b∣+1){b,{a,c}}.

Proof

1.1givenF2algebra

Since the bracket has degree +1 by [F2] and ∣S∣=0, the map dS(a)={S,a} sends Ar into Ar+1 and has degree +1.

1.2givenF2algebra

Apply the Jacobi identity [F2] with a=b=S and third entry x; its sign is (−1)(0+1)(0+1)=−1, so {S,{S,x}}={{S,S},x}−{S,{S,x}} and therefore 2dS2(x)={{S,S},x}.

2.1givenF1step 1.2algebra∎

The CME [F1] makes the right side zero. Characteristic zero makes 2 invertible, hence dS2(x)=0 for every x∈A.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources