How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Differential Graded Algebras and Homological Foundations: Examples and Counterexamples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Differential Graded Algebras and Homological Foundations
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
This companion checks the A-page definitions directly. The examples and counterexample are model-specific constructions; they are not general theorem suppliers.
Companion: dg-and-homological-algebra-foundations.
Reading prerequisites
Read dg-and-homological-algebra-foundations before these verifications; the example items name their exact local definition suppliers.
Existing library route
-
chain-complexes-and-homology: the established chain/cochain convention.
-
derived-categories: derived categories under the exact hypotheses on that page.
-
hochschild-homology-and-diagonal-koszul-resolutions: Hochschild homology; no Gerstenhaber bracket or formality is inferred.
Scope and local proof obligations
Worked computations and failure cases
- Polynomial differential forms on the line verifies the signed rule and for polynomial forms.
- A degree-one derivation need not square to zero gives a degree-one derivation whose square is nonzero.
- A differential graded algebra as its regular left module verifies the regular left-module construction.
Canonical suppliers and reuse boundaries
-
def-cochain-complex-in-an-abelian-category: cohomological grading convention.
-
thm-a-chain-homotopy-equivalence-is-a-quasi-isomorphism: a chain homotopy equivalence induces a homology isomorphism.
Conventions, diagrams, and sources
All verifications use the cohomological convention fixed on the A page. They do not use tensor-product sign formulas, derived-category claims, Hochschild brackets, or physics premises.
The B-page inventory and its proofs are recorded in the batch notes and proof contracts.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Polynomial differential forms on the line
Example
Let and , where is the ideal generated by . Write also for its class in . Each class has a unique representative , so , with , , , , and for . Multiplication is induced by polynomial multiplication; equivalently, and . The unit is the class of in degree zero. Define the map by where the formal derivative of is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The graded algebra and map above. Verify that they form a cohomological DGA.
The integers form a commutative ring: The standard addition and multiplication on make it a commutative ring with multiplicative identity.
Ring: an abelian group under addition and a monoid under multiplication, with multiplication distributing over addition on both sides and Commutative ring: A commutative ring has an abelian additive group, an associative unital multiplication, both distributive laws, and commutative multiplication.
Polynomial convolution makes a commutative ring containing as its constant subring: If is a commutative ring, then the coefficientwise and convolution operations make a commutative ring.
In a commutative ring, consists of finite sums , and : In a commutative ring, consists of the multiples of .
For a two-sided ideal , the additive cosets form a ring with identity : For a ring and a two-sided ideal , is a ring with identity.
Cohomological differential graded algebra: For homogeneous and , require the signed Leibniz rule
Cohomological differential graded algebra: The defining cochain differential satisfies .
Verification
By [F1] and [F2], with its standard operations is a commutative ring with unit, so it is an admissible base for [F6].
Applying [F3] first to and then to shows that is a commutative ring. By [F4], is a two-sided ideal; [F5] therefore gives the quotient ring with its associative multiplication and unit. For cosets, , so is commutative. The constant classes define a unital ring homomorphism ; its induced scalar action is central, and associativity and distributivity make multiplication -bilinear.
Every polynomial in with coefficients in has a unique form . By [F4], the last term is in , and a polynomial of degree at most one in lies in only when both its coefficients vanish. Thus every quotient class has a unique representative , giving the stated direct sum of -modules. The quotient multiplication is ; this preserves the grading and gives and .
The unique expression in step 3.1 makes the formula for well defined. Coefficientwise differentiation is additive and commutes with multiplication by each integer, so is -linear; it sends to and to , hence has degree .
For every , , because vanishes on . Thus [F7] holds.
If and have degree zero, the finite coefficient sums give . Hence .
If and have degrees zero and one, both and vanish because and . If and , then both sides of vanish because and . If both have degree one, their product and both terms on the right vanish. These are all remaining homogeneous degree pairs, so [F6] holds.
step 1.1, step 2.1, step 3.1 establish the graded unital associative -algebra structure, and step 4.1, step 5.1, step 5.2, step 5.3 establish the degree-one, square-zero differential and signed Leibniz rule. Thus all conditions of [F6] hold, so is a cohomological DGA.
A degree-one derivation need not square to zero
Statement refuted
For every graded associative unital -algebra , every degree- -linear map satisfying for homogeneous is square-zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The usual rational field and the free associative graded -algebra with , , and , whose multiplication is concatenation of words. Its -basis consists of finite words in , including the empty word . Define , , and ; for a word , define with , and extend -linearly. Refute the statement.
The rationals form a field: with its usual operations is a field.
Every field is a commutative ring with ; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring: Every field is a commutative ring with unit, so is an admissible base ring for the DGA definition.
Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms: A -algebra has a unital structure map from the commutative base ring .
Cohomological differential graded algebra: The defining cochain differential satisfies .
Counterexample
By [F1] and [F2], is a commutative ring with unit, and [F3] is the unital base-algebra convention used in the construction of . The words form a -basis, so the displayed formula defines a unique linear map. Every nonzero generator image has degree one higher than its input. For homogeneous words , the summands replacing letters of give , while those replacing letters of acquire the extra sign ; hence . Bilinearity extends the identity to all homogeneous elements.
Applying the generator rules twice gives . The word is a nonzero basis element of the free algebra, so .
By [F4], square-zero is required for a cohomological DGA differential. Thus is a degree-one graded derivation that is not square-zero, refuting the statement.
A differential graded algebra as its regular left module
Example
Let be any cohomological DGA over a commutative ring . Let as a graded -module, let act on by left multiplication, and let .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A cohomological DGA over with its multiplication and differential. Verify that its regular left module is a differential graded module.
Cohomological differential graded algebra: The multiplication on is -bilinear, associative and unital, has degree zero, and has central -action.
Cohomological differential graded algebra: For homogeneous and , the differential satisfies .
Cohomological left and right differential graded modules: A cohomological left differential graded -module is a graded unital left -module whose action has degree zero, together with a degree-one square-zero differential satisfying for homogeneous .
Cohomological differential graded algebra: The differential consists of -linear maps with .
Verification
Associativity and the unit of make left multiplication a unital left -action on , and degree preservation gives ; zero acts by zero and the unit acts as the identity.
The differential has degree and squares to zero by [F4]. For homogeneous , the required identity is the DGA Leibniz identity [F2].
The action and differential therefore satisfy every condition in [F3], so is a left DG module over itself.