Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite grid complexes for knot Floer theory

Definition

The grid-complex algorithm takes a finite encoded grid and a mode from {tilde,minus-associated-graded,minus-filtered}. It requires an integer grid number n≥2, disjoint O- and X-markings with exactly one of each in every row and column, and an induced component permutation that is one n-cycle. If n<2 or the marking conditions fail, return invalid-grid; if the component permutation has more than one cycle, return link-input-not-supported. No chain complex is returned on either branch.

For a valid knot grid, number the horizontal and vertical circles 1,…,n and enumerate all permutations of {1,…,n} in lexicographic order. The state for a permutation σ consists of the n intersections (i,σ(i)). For each ordered pair of states x,y, if they agree in other than exactly n−2 points, add no rectangle terms. Otherwise enumerate the at most two torus rectangles with the four nonshared state points as corners, retain those whose interiors contain no point of x, and apply the selected mode. In the full filtered mode, each term drops filtration by nX(r); the associated-graded mode retains precisely the terms with zero drop, which are the rectangles with no X-marking:

  1. Tilde mode. Work over F2. Count a retained rectangle with coefficient 1 exactly when its interior contains no O- or X-marking.
  2. Associated-graded minus mode. Work over F2[U1,…,Un], with each Ui of Maslov degree −2 and Alexander filtration degree −1. Count a retained rectangle exactly when its interior contains no X-marking, with coefficient ∏i=1nUiOi(r).
  3. Full filtered minus mode. Work over F2[U1,…,Un], with each Ui of Maslov degree −2 and Alexander filtration degree −1. Count every retained rectangle, regardless of its X-markings, with coefficient ∏i=1nUiOi(r). Use the grid Alexander value for each state and assign filtration drop nX(r) to this term.

Return the ordered state list, the mode and coefficient ring, the exact differential matrix obtained by summing coefficients modulo two, the state Maslov and Alexander values, and the filtration data for the full filtered mode. The algorithm returns this finite presentation only; its identification with knot Floer homology and its independence of the chosen grid are separate theorems. The factor V⊗(n−1) is not multiplied into the output.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources