How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Randomized proximal coordinate descent with certified inner solves
Definition
Whenever a subscript indexes a block, is shorthand for .
Let on , where is a disjoint nonempty partition of coordinate labels , with label denoting standard coordinate . Let be convex and continuously differentiable in the sense of Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms, and let each be proper, closed and convex. Define from The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case as the entries of on the labels in , in increasing order; their existence follows from total differentiability and A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian. Let satisfy the block-gradient Lipschitz bound of Coordinate-block smoothness descent model, choose majorizers , probabilities with , a feasible initial point , an update budget , and nonnegative inner tolerances .
At update , draw with probabilities independently of previous draws. For the selected block , form
In exact mode, set to the global minimizer of ; leave every other block unchanged. In certified-inexact mode, an inner oracle returns with a certificate
accept only when that certificate is available and valid. Otherwise return the last accepted point with status inner-solve-failure. The output is the current point, its objective value, the last certified inner gap when available, and status tolerance-met, budget-limit, or inner-solve-failure.
If a proximal-gradient stopping tolerance is requested, after each accepted update compute the block mapping
Here abbreviates , a singleton by Proximal mapping and Existence, resolvent characterization, and firm nonexpansiveness of the proximal map; by the input conditions. Stop with tolerance-met when ; otherwise stop after at most accepted updates with budget-limit. A finite budget or tolerance status is not an uncomputed objective-gap guarantee. Uniform sampling is ; nonuniform choices require the separate probability/step relation proved for the smooth gradient branch on this page.
Depends on
- Proper closed convex extended-real functions on $\mathbb R^n$
- Proximal mapping
- Existence, resolvent characterization, and firm nonexpansiveness of the proximal map
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
- A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian
- Coordinate-block smoothness descent model
Used by
- An R-only proximal coordinate rate fails for nonsmooth penalties Counterexample
- Strong convexity of the composite alone does not give the stated coordinate factor Counterexample
- Coordinate proximal subproblems are attained uniquely and descend Lemma
- Proximal coordinate contraction from strong convexity of the composite Theorem
- Strongly convex smooth-part proximal coordinate contraction Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stephen J. Wright, Coordinate Descent Algorithms, §3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Clément Royer, Regularized, Large-Scale and Distributed Optimization, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)