How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Self-normalized importance sampling
Definition
Let be a measure space. The unnormalized target density is a measurable with and target . Let be a measurable proposal probability density against , let , and let be a measurable real-valued integrand. The input is an IID sample from in the sense of Identical distribution and IID families, with . For target interpretation require -almost everywhere. Write This is a nonnegative unnormalized importance weight; the value on is immaterial under and under the stated target support condition.
The reciprocal map that is for and for is Borel. Its composition with , multiplied by , makes measurable by Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability and Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined.
Procedure and output: Compute . If , return the status no estimate: zero observed target weight. If , return For consistency require and . A ratio CLT and its Monte Carlo standard error require finite second moments of and .
Depends on
Used by
- A high observed weight ESS can miss target mass Counterexample
- Weight-based effective sample size Definition
- Ordinary and self-normalized importance sampling on a two-point space Example
- Self-normalized importance sampling is strongly consistent under finite first moments Theorem
- Self-normalized importance sampling ratio CLT and consistent Monte Carlo standard error Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Quan Zhou, STAT 689 Unit 1: Introduction, Rejection and Importance Sampling, §1.3, Theorem 1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas B. Schön and Fredrik Lindsten, Learning of dynamical systems: Particle filters and Markov chain methods, Chapter 4 §§4.3.1, 4.3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tuan Anh Le, Importance Sampling, §Self-Normalized Importance Sampling (standard reference, not scraped)
- Monte Carlo Methods course notes, Chapter 6 §6.2 (standard reference, not scraped)