Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 2 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Ordinary and self-normalized importance sampling

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Ordinary importance sampling changes measure with a known target normalizer. Its unbiasedness needs integrable weighted values, while finite variance and a normal limit need the corresponding weighted second moment; the CLT branch also states its Axiom of Choice use. Self-normalized importance sampling estimates an unknown normalizer by a ratio. Under target support q>0 π-almost everywhere and the finite first moments EQW=Zp and EQ[W∣f∣]<∞, it is strongly consistent. Finite second moments of W and Wf yield the ratio CLT under AC and plug-in Monte Carlo standard-error consistency without AC. The companion examples calculate finite-sample ratio bias and show that weight ESS diagnoses observed imbalance but does not certify target support coverage.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Ordinary importance sampling

Definition

Let (X,X,μ) be a measure space. An unnormalized target density is a measurable function p~:X→[0,∞) with Zp:=∫Xp~ dμ∈(0,∞). The target probability measure is π(dx)=p~(x)μ(dx)/Zp. A proposal density is a measurable q:X→[0,∞) with ∫q dμ=1; write Q(dx)=q(x)μ(dx). The input integrand f:X→R is measurable, and the input sample X1,…,Xn is IID with law Q, in the sense of Identical distribution and IID families. The normalizing constant Zp is known for this algorithm.

Admissible conditions for an unbiased estimate: n≥1, q>0 μ-almost everywhere on {x:f(x)p~(x)≠0}, and the random variable Y:={f(X1)p~(X1)/(Zpq(X1)),q(X1)>0,0,q(X1)=0 is integrable under Q. The support condition makes the value on q=0 immaterial to the target integral.

Well-defined weights: The reciprocal map r(s)=1/s for s>0 and r(s)=0 for s≤0 is Borel. Its composition with q, multiplied by the measurable inputs, makes the piecewise weight and weighted integrand measurable (Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability, Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined).

Procedure and output: For each supplied draw Xi, set Yi=f(Xi)p~(Xi)/(Zpq(Xi)) when q(Xi)>0 and set Yi=0 otherwise. Return μ^IS:=1n∑i=1nYi. Separate variance and central limit claims require the corresponding weighted second-moment hypothesis.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Ordinary importance sampling is unbiased

Statement

Let (X,X,μ) be a measure space, let p~≥0 and q≥0 be measurable densities with Zp=∫p~ dμ∈(0,∞) and ∫q dμ=1, and set π(dx)=p~(x)μ(dx)/Zp and Q(dx)=q(x)μ(dx). Let f:X→R be measurable with ∫∣f∣p~ dμ<∞. Suppose q>0 μ-almost everywhere on {fp~≠0} and X1,…,Xn are IID with law Q. For the ordinary importance sampling estimator in Ordinary importance sampling, EQ[μ^IS]=∫f dπ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The densities, integrability, support, and IID sampling hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Ordinary importance sampling: With Yi=f(Xi)p~(Xi)/(Zpq(Xi)) when q(Xi)>0 and Yi=0 otherwise, the estimator is μ^IS=n−1∑i=1nYi.

[F2]

Change of variables for expectation: For a random element X with law Q, a nonnegative measurable g satisfies E[g(X)]=∫g dQ, possibly with value +∞; if g(X) is integrable, the same identity holds as a finite integral.

[F3]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ): The Lebesgue integral is linear on integrable functions; in particular, the expectation of a finite average of integrable random variables is the average of their expectations.

[F4]

Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable: The expectation of an integrable real random variable is its finite Lebesgue integral.

[F5]

Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product: for a nonnegative measurable density r and nonnegative measurable h, ∫h d(r dμ)=∫hr dμ, including infinite values. Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: an absolutely integrable real function has integral equal to the finite difference of the integrals of its positive and negative parts.

Proof

Given: Use the target expectation θ:=∫f dπ and the estimator specified in Ordinary importance sampling.

1.1givenF1F2F4algebraF5

Use [F5] with density r=q for integration against Q and with r=p~/Zp for integration against π. For every i, apply the nonnegative case of [F2] to ∣Yi∣. Since Xi has law Q, EQ∣Yi∣=∫{q>0}∣f(x)∣p~(x)Zpq(x)q(x) dμ(x)=1Zp∫{q>0}∣f∣p~ dμ≤1Zp∫X∣f∣p~ dμ<∞. Thus Yi is Q-integrable. For any real measurable h whose absolute integral is finite against r dμ, apply [F5] separately to h+=max⁡(h,0) and h−=max⁡(−h,0): both product integrals are finite because h±≤∣h∣. Subtracting their finite identities yields ∫h d(r dμ)=∫hr dμ, since (hr)±=h±r for r≥0 (with the density convention 0⋅∞=0). The integrable case of [F2] therefore gives EQ[Yi]=∫{q>0}f(x)p~(x)Zpq(x)q(x) dμ(x)=1Zp∫{q>0}fp~ dμ. The support condition makes fp~=0 μ-almost everywhere on {q=0}; hence this last integral equals Zp−1∫Xfp~ dμ=∫f dπ=θ.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

By [F1], μ^IS=n−1∑i=1nYi. Apply [F3] and step 1.1 to obtain EQ[μ^IS]=n−1∑i=1nEQ[Yi]=θ.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Ordinary importance sampling has finite variance and a CLT under a weighted second moment

Statement

Use the hypotheses and notation of Ordinary importance sampling is unbiased. Define Yi:={f(Xi)p~(Xi)/(Zpq(Xi)),q(Xi)>0,0,q(Xi)=0,θ:=∫f dπ,σ2:=Var⁡Q(Y1). If EQ[Y12]<∞, then μ^IS has finite variance and Var⁡Q(μ^IS)=σ2n=1n(1Zp2∫{q>0}f(x)2p~(x)2q(x) dμ(x)−θ2). This finite-sample conclusion is choice-free. For the central limit conclusion, let (Xi)i≥1 be an IID sequence with law Q, and apply the estimator to its first n draws for each n≥1. If, in addition, AC holds, then n(μ^IS−θ)⇒N(0,σ2). No finite variance or normal-limit claim is made when the weighted second moment is infinite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The integrable ordinary importance sampling setup from Ordinary importance sampling is unbiased, plus EQ[Y12]<∞. For the CLT conclusion, take an IID sequence (Xi)i≥1 with law Q and assume AC.

[F1]

Ordinary importance sampling: The estimate is the sample average of the weighted values Yi=f(Xi)p~(Xi)/(Zpq(Xi)), with value 0 when q(Xi)=0; the algorithm also establishes that this piecewise weighted-integrand map is measurable.

[F2]

Ordinary importance sampling is unbiased: Under its support and integrability hypotheses, EQ[μ^IS]=θ=∫f dπ.

[F3]

Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: Applying measurable coordinatewise maps to an independent family preserves independence.

[F4]

Identical distribution and IID families: IID means a common law and mutual independence.

[F5]

Variance adds for every finite pairwise-independent family: The variance of a finite sum of pairwise-independent square-integrable real variables is the sum of their variances. Variance and covariance identities for random variables: Covariance is bilinear on finite linear combinations, so Var⁡(aY)=a2Var⁡(Y) and Var⁡(Y)=E[Y2]−(EY)2.

[F6]

Change of variables for expectation: For a nonnegative measurable function of a random element with law Q, expectation equals its integral against Q.

[F7]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: For square-integrable real Y, Var⁡(Y)=E[(Y−EY)2].

[F8]

Lindeberg–Lévy limit for the IID Monte Carlo mean: Under AC, a real IID sample with positive finite variance satisfies n(Yˉn−EY1)⇒N(0,Var⁡(Y1)).

[F9]

A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere: A nonnegative measurable function has integral zero exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere.

[F10]

Standard normal and normal laws: N(m,0) is the Dirac law δm.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it is assumed only for the central limit conclusion.

[F11]

Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product: for a nonnegative measurable density r and nonnegative measurable h, ∫h d(r dμ)=∫hr dμ, including infinite values.

Proof

Given: The weighted values Yi from the Statement and the finite second moment EQ[Y12]<∞.

1.1F1F3F4given

By [F1], each Yi is obtained from Xi by the same measurable weighted-integrand map and μ^IS=n−1∑i=1nYi. Since the Xi are IID, [F3] preserves independence and their common law under this map; [F4] therefore makes (Yi) IID.

2.1F2F5givenstep 1.1algebra

Applying [F2] to a sample of size one gives EQY1=θ, and it also gives EQ[μ^IS]=θ for the supplied sample. By step 1.1 every Yi has the same finite second moment and variance σ2, and the finite family is pairwise independent. Thus [F5] gives Var⁡Q(∑i=1nYi)=nσ2 and Var⁡Q(μ^IS)=n−2(nσ2)=σ2/n.

3.1F1F5F6step 2.1givenalgebraF11

Use [F11] with density r=q for integration against Q. Applying [F6] to the nonnegative squared weighted integrand gives EQ[Y12]=Zp−2∫{q>0}f(x)2p~(x)2/q(x) dμ(x). By [F5] and step 2.1, σ2=EQ[Y12]−θ2, proving the displayed variance formula.

4.1A1F7F8F9F10step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

For the CLT, use the given IID sequence (Xi)i≥1 and assume AC as in [A1]. The measurable transformation in step 1.1 now makes (Yi)i≥1 IID. If σ2>0, [F8] applies to the IID sequence from step 1.1 with mean θ from step 2.1 and yields the stated normal limit. If σ2=0, [F7] gives EQ[(Y1−θ)2]=0, so [F9] implies Y1=θ Q-almost surely. By the common-law conclusion of step 1.1, each event {Yi≠θ} is null; for each fixed n, the union of the first n such events is null. Thus Yˉn=θ almost surely for each n, and the centered sample mean has law δ0=N(0,0) for every n by [F10]. The variance argument in the preceding steps used no choice axiom.

AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Self-normalized importance sampling

Definition

Let (X,X,μ) be a measure space. The unnormalized target density is a measurable p~≥0 with 0<Zp=∫p~ dμ<∞ and target π(dx)=p~(x)μ(dx)/Zp. Let q≥0 be a measurable proposal probability density against μ, let Q(dx)=q(x)μ(dx), and let f be a measurable real-valued integrand. The input X1,…,Xn is an IID sample from Q in the sense of Identical distribution and IID families, with n≥1. For target interpretation require q>0 π-almost everywhere. Write Wi:={p~(Xi)/q(Xi),q(Xi)>0,0,q(Xi)=0. This is a nonnegative unnormalized importance weight; the value on q=0 is immaterial under Q and under the stated target support condition.

The reciprocal map that is 1/s for s>0 and 0 for s≤0 is Borel. Its composition with q, multiplied by p~, makes Wi measurable by Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability and Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined.

Procedure and output: Compute Sn=∑i=1nWi. If Sn=0, return the status no estimate: zero observed target weight. If Sn>0, return θ^SN:=∑i=1nWif(Xi)Sn. For consistency require EQW1=Zp∈(0,∞) and EQ[W1∣f(X1)∣]<∞. A ratio CLT and its Monte Carlo standard error require finite second moments of W1 and W1f(X1).

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Self-normalized importance sampling is strongly consistent under finite first moments

Statement

Let (X,X,μ) be a measure space, p~≥0 a measurable target density with Zp=∫p~ dμ∈(0,∞), π(dx)=p~(x)μ(dx)/Zp, and q≥0 a measurable proposal probability density with Q(dx)=q(x)μ(dx). Assume q>0 π-almost everywhere. Let X1,X2,… be IID with law Q, put Wi=p~(Xi)/q(Xi) for q(Xi)>0 and Wi=0 otherwise, and let f:X→R be measurable. Suppose EQW1=Zp∈(0,∞),EQ[W1∣f(X1)∣]<∞. Then the self-normalized estimate in Self-normalized importance sampling satisfies θ^SN,n⟶θ:=∫f dπalmost surely. On a finite prefix where all observed weights vanish, the algorithm's no-estimate status is interpreted as the value 0 for this convergence statement; almost surely that fallback is eventually unnecessary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The target, proposal, support, integrability, and IID sampling assumptions in the Statement.

[F1]

Self-normalized importance sampling: The estimate is ∑iWif(Xi)/∑iWi when the denominator is positive, with a no-estimate status when all weights vanish.

[F2]

Change of variables for expectation: For a random element with law Q, an integrable measurable function g has expectation EQg=∫g dQ; it also gives the same identity for nonnegative measurable g.

[F3]

Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: Applying measurable coordinatewise maps to an independent family preserves independence.

[F4]

Identical distribution and IID families: IID means mutual independence and a common law; no moment condition is included in the definition.

[F5]

Strong and weak consistency of the IID Monte Carlo mean: For real IID Yi with finite first absolute moment, their sample mean converges almost surely to EY1.

[F6]

Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability and Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: The reciprocal on q>0, extended by 0 on q≤0, its absolute value, and the resulting products with p~ and f are measurable.

[F7]

A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes: A nonnegative measurable function has integral zero over a measurable null set.

[F8]

Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product: for a nonnegative measurable density r and nonnegative measurable h, ∫h d(r dμ)=∫hr dμ, including infinite values. Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: an absolutely integrable real function has integral equal to the finite difference of the integrals of its positive and negative parts.

Proof

Given: Use Wi and θ^SN,n from the Statement and Self-normalized importance sampling.

1.1givenF2F6F7algebraF8

Use [F8] with density r=q for integration against Q and with r=p~/Zp for integration against π. By [F6], the functions w(x)=p~(x)/q(x) on q>0 (with value 0 on q=0) and v(x)=w(x)f(x) are measurable. The support condition gives π({q=0})=0. For each i, Xi has law Q, so the given finite first moment applies to its weight and integrand. By [F2], EQ[Wi∣f(Xi)∣]=∫{q>0}p~(x)∣f(x)∣q(x)q(x) dμ(x)=∫{q>0}p~∣f∣ dμ. The given finite moment therefore implies ∫{q>0}p~∣f∣ dμ<∞. Since π({q=0})=0, [F7] gives ∫{q=0}∣f∣ dπ=0, and thus ∫{q=0}p~∣f∣ dμ=Zp∫{q=0}∣f∣ dπ=0. Hence ∫Xp~∣f∣ dμ<∞ and θ=∫f dπ is well-defined. For any real measurable h whose absolute integral is finite against r dμ, apply [F8] separately to h+=max⁡(h,0) and h−=max⁡(−h,0): both product integrals are finite because h±≤∣h∣. Subtracting their finite identities yields ∫h d(r dμ)=∫hr dμ, since (hr)±=h±r for r≥0 (with the density convention 0⋅∞=0). The integrable case of [F2] now gives EQVi=∫{q>0}p~(x)f(x)q(x)q(x) dμ(x)=∫{q>0}p~f dμ=∫Xp~f dμ=Zpθ, where the omitted signed integral is zero because its absolute integral over {q=0} is zero. Likewise, the nonnegative case of [F2] gives EQWi=∫{q>0}p~ dμ=Zp, since ∫{q=0}p~ dμ=Zpπ({q=0})=0. All these expectations agree across i by the common law of the Xi.

1.2givenF3F4F5

Applying [F3] separately to the measurable maps w and v shows that each family (Wi) and (Vi) is independent. Each family has a common law because every Xi has law Q and the same map is applied to each draw. Thus both sequences are IID as in [F4], and [F5] gives n−1∑iWi→Zp and n−1∑iVi→Zpθ almost surely.

2.1F1step 1.2givenalgebra∎

On the probability-one event from step 1.2, the denominator average is eventually greater than Zp/2>0, so the ratio is eventually defined and θ^SN,n=n−1∑iVin−1∑iWi⟶ZpθZp=θ. The numerical zero interpretation for any preceding finite prefix with zero denominator is the convention stated in this theorem; the algorithm itself returns the no-estimate status in [F1].

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Self-normalized importance sampling ratio CLT and consistent Monte Carlo standard error

Statement

Let (X,X,μ), p~, Zp, π, q, Q, f, and Wi satisfy the hypotheses and definitions of Self-normalized importance sampling is strongly consistent under finite first moments. Assume also EQ[W12]<∞,EQ[(W1f(X1))2]<∞, and assume AC for the central limit conclusion. For every n≥1, put Sn=∑i=1nWi and define the numerical extension θ^SN,n=∑i=1nWif(Xi)/Sn when Sn>0, and θ^SN,n=0 when Sn=0. This replaces the algorithm's no-estimate status by 0 for all convergence statements below. Set θ=∫f dπ and τ2:=1Zp2EQ ⁣[W12(f(X1)−θ)2]. This is finite under the stated second moments. Then this numerical extension of the estimate in Self-normalized importance sampling satisfies n(θ^SN,n−θ)⇒N(0,τ2). Define its plug-in variance estimate, when Sn>0, by Var⁡^MC(θ^SN,n):=∑i=1nWi2(f(Xi)−θ^SN,n)2Sn2, and set this quantity to 0 if Sn=0. Then, without using AC, nVar⁡^MC(θ^SN,n)⟶τ2almost surely. Define se⁡^MC,n to be the nonnegative square root of this plug-in variance. Then n se⁡^MC,n→τ almost surely. No finite-sample unbiasedness assertion is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The IID sampling and first-moment hypotheses of Self-normalized importance sampling is strongly consistent under finite first moments, the additional second moments, and AC for the CLT branch.

[F1]

Self-normalized importance sampling: The algorithm defines a measurable weight w and, for Sn>0, returns θ^SN,n=∑iWif(Xi)/Sn; when Sn=0, it returns the status no estimate: zero observed target weight.

[F2]

Change of variables for expectation: A nonnegative measurable function of an IID draw with law Q has expectation given by integration against Q, possibly with value +∞; the same identity holds as a finite integral for integrable functions.

[F3]

Multivariate iid central limit theorem: Under AC, IID Rd-valued variables with finite second moment and covariance Σ have sample-mean limit n(Xˉn−m)⇒Nd(0,Σ); singular Σ is allowed.

[F4]

First- and second-order delta method for random vectors: If n(Tn−η)⇒Z and g(η+h)−g(η)=Ah+o(∥h∥), then n(g(Tn)−g(η))⇒AZ.

[F5]

Self-normalized importance sampling is strongly consistent under finite first moments: Under its support and finite first-moment assumptions, the ratio estimate converges almost surely to θ, and its denominator is eventually positive almost surely. For the convergence statement, that theorem interprets the algorithm's no-estimate status as the numeric value 0 on any finite prefix with zero observed target weight.

[F6]

Kolmogorov iid l1 strong law: Every IID integrable real sequence has sample mean converging almost surely to its expectation.

[F7]

Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: Applying one measurable function to each member of an independent family preserves independence.

[F8]

Identical distribution and IID families: A family is IID when it is mutually independent and has a common law.

[F9]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: Covariance is the expectation of the product of centered square-integrable variables, and variance is the self-covariance.

[F10]

Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance: Under AC, Z∼Nd(0,Σ) exactly when each linear projection u⋅Z is normal with variance uTΣu; singular covariance is allowed.

[F11]

Holder's inequality for random variables: For conjugate exponents p=q=2, square-integrable real random variables R,S satisfy E∣RS∣≤(E∣R∣2)1/2(E∣S∣2)1/2, so RS is integrable.

[F12]

Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: Finite products and sums, and absolute values, of measurable real functions remain measurable.

[F13]

A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes: A nonnegative measurable function has integral zero over a measurable null set.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; the CLT branch inherits it through [F3] and [F10], while the strong-law standard-error branch is choice-free.

[F14]

Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product: for a nonnegative measurable density r and nonnegative measurable h, ∫h d(r dμ)=∫hr dμ, including infinite values. Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: an absolutely integrable real function has integral equal to the finite difference of the integrals of its positive and negative parts.

Proof

Given: Let Zi=(Wi,Wif(Xi)), Wˉn=n−1∑iWi, and Vˉn=n−1∑iWif(Xi).

1.1A1F1F2F3F7F8F12F13givenF14

Use [F14] with density r=q for integration against Q and with r=p~/Zp for integration against π. By the support condition, π({q=0})=0. For each i, Xi has law Q, so the given finite first moment applies to Wi∣f(Xi)∣. The integrable case of [F2] gives EQ[Wi∣f(Xi)∣]=∫{q>0}p~(x)∣f(x)∣q(x)q(x) dμ(x)=∫{q>0}p~∣f∣ dμ<∞. By [F13], ∫{q=0}∣f∣ dπ=0, and hence ∫{q=0}p~∣f∣ dμ=Zp∫{q=0}∣f∣ dπ=0. Thus ∫Xp~∣f∣ dμ<∞. For any real measurable h whose absolute integral is finite against r dμ, apply [F14] separately to h+=max⁡(h,0) and h−=max⁡(−h,0): both product integrals are finite because h±≤∣h∣. Subtracting their finite identities yields ∫h d(r dμ)=∫hr dμ, since (hr)±=h±r for r≥0 (with the density convention 0⋅∞=0). The integrable case of [F2] applied to Wif(Xi) yields EQ[Wif(Xi)]=∫{q>0}p~f dμ=∫Xp~f dμ=Zpθ, because the omitted signed integral is zero by its absolute integrability on the π-null set. The nonnegative case of [F2] also gives EQWi=∫{q>0}p~ dμ=Zp, since ∫{q=0}p~ dμ=Zpπ({q=0})=0. The second-moment assumptions make Zi square-integrable. The map x↦(w(x),w(x)f(x)) is measurable by [F1] and [F12]. Applying [F7] to this map proves that the pairs Zi are independent; their laws agree because each Xi has law Q and the same map is applied, so they are IID by [F8]. Therefore [F3] and [A1] give n((Wˉn,Vˉn)−(Zp,Zpθ))⇒N2(0,Σ), where Σ=Cov⁡Q(Z1).

2.1F5F6F7F8F11F12givenstep 1.1algebra

Put Ui=Wi2(f(Xi)−θ)2, Ci=Wi2(f(Xi)−θ), and Bi=Wi2. Their measurability follows from [F12]. The stated second moments and (Wif(Xi)−θWi)2≤2(Wif(Xi))2+2θ2Wi2 give EUi<∞ and EBi<∞; [F11] gives E∣Ci∣≤(EUi)1/2(EBi)1/2<∞. Each transformed sequence is IID by [F7] and [F8], so [F6] applies to all three. Also (Wi) is IID and integrable, with mean Zp by step 1.1; applying [F6] to this sequence gives Wˉn→Zp>0 almost surely. Separately, [F5] gives θ^SN,n→θ almost surely.

2.2F1F4step 1.1givenalgebra

Define the Borel function g(s,t)=t/s for s>0 and g(s,t)=0 for s≤0; it is Borel because the ratio is continuous on the open set s>0 and the other branch is constant on its Borel complement. At η=(Zp,Zpθ), its derivative is A(h1,h2)=(−θh1+h2)/Zp: for h1 small enough that Zp+h1>0, g(η+h)−g(η)−Ah=−h1(h2−θh1)Zp(Zp+h1)=O(∥h∥2). Since Zp>0, this is a valid first-order expansion. Since Wˉn≥0, g(Wˉn,Vˉn) equals the ratio when Sn>0; when Sn=0, it equals the numerical value 0 prescribed by the Statement. Thus g(Wˉn,Vˉn)=θ^SN,n for every n, including the zero-weight branch where [F1] returns a status. Apply [F4] to step 1.1 to obtain the scalar limit AZ, where Z∼N2(0,Σ).

3.1F2F9F10step 1.1step 2.2algebra

By [F10], AZ is centered normal with variance AΣAT. The centered linear combination of Z1 defining this variance is Zp−1(W1f(X1)−θW1), whose mean is zero by [F2]. Therefore AΣAT=Zp−2EQ[W12(f(X1)−θ)2]=τ2, which proves the stated CLT.

4.1F5F6F7F8F11F12step 2.1givenalgebra∎

On the probability-one event from step 2.1 the denominator is eventually positive, and expansion of the squared residual gives nVar⁡^MC=Uˉn−2(θ^SN,n−θ)Cˉn+(θ^SN,n−θ)2BˉnWˉn2. The numerator tends to EU1 and the denominator tends to Zp2, so the limit is Zp−2EU1=τ2. Continuity of the nonnegative square-root map gives n se⁡^MC,n→τ. This argument uses only the choice-free suppliers [F5], [F6], [F7], [F8], [F11], and [F12], not AC.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Weight-based effective sample size

Definition

For the nonnegative importance weights w1,…,wn in Self-normalized importance sampling, with n≥1 and at least one positive weight, define the weight-based effective sample size by ESS⁡w:=(∑i=1nwi)2∑i=1nwi2. It is a diagnostic of observed weight imbalance. It depends only on the weights, not on the integrand, proposal regions that were never sampled, or target mass outside the observed sample. It does not certify support coverage, finite variance, accuracy, or convergence.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources