Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A smooth approximation without relative control destroys prescribed values

Statement refuted

An arbitrarily close smooth approximation automatically preserves values on a closed set where the original map was already fixed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The zero map f:RR and the closed set A:={0}.

[L1]

Relative Whitney approximation is the theorem that guarantees preservation near the closed set (Relative Whitney approximation for Euclidean-valued maps).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

For every ϵ>0, the smooth function gϵ(x):=ϵex2 satisfies supxgϵ(x)f(x)ϵ. So gϵ is an arbitrarily close smooth approximation to f.

givenalgebra
2.1

But gϵ(0)=ϵ0=f(0), so this approximation does not preserve the prescribed value on A. Thus closeness alone is weaker than the relative conclusion in [L1].

L1step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources