How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A smooth approximation without relative control destroys prescribed values
Statement refuted
An arbitrarily close smooth approximation automatically preserves values on a closed set where the original map was already fixed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The zero map and the closed set .
Relative Whitney approximation is the theorem that guarantees preservation near the closed set (Relative Whitney approximation for Euclidean-valued maps).
Counterexample
For every , the smooth function satisfies . So is an arbitrarily close smooth approximation to .
But , so this approximation does not preserve the prescribed value on . Thus closeness alone is weaker than the relative conclusion in [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Smooth Approximation of Maps Between Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)