Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

AM-GM fails for negative entries: (−1,−4) has geometric mean 2 and arithmetic mean −5/2

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: the conclusion ab≤a+b2 of the two-term arithmetic-geometric mean inequality holds for arbitrary real a,b, with the square root as in Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0} and the rational power as in Rational powers ar of a positive base.

Witness: a:=−1, b:=−4. The product is ab=4, so the geometric mean is 41/2=2, while the arithmetic mean is (−1−4)/2=−5/2; thus G=2>−5/2=A and the inequality fails. The failure is not an accident of the witness: for any two negative entries a,b<0 the product is positive, so G>0, while A<0, giving G>A. A second failure mode is non-existence: for a:=−1, b:=1 the product is −1, which has no real square root (FALSE: every real number has a real square root), so G is not defined at all. By contrast the equivalent squared form ab≤A2 of The arithmetic mean, geometric mean inequality survives for all real a,b, since A2−ab=(a−b)2/4≥0; the hypothesis a,b≥0 is spent exactly on passing from that squared form to the geometric-mean form, which needs a nonnegative arithmetic mean and a real geometric mean.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The real numbers a:=−1, b:=−4 for the witness; general real numbers a,b in the systematic discussion, with A:=(a+b)/2 and G:=(ab)1/2 whenever the latter is defined.

[L1]

Arithmetic-geometric mean (The arithmetic mean, geometric mean inequality): for two nonnegative entries u,v one has (uv)1/2≤(u+v)/2, equivalently uv≤((u+v)/2)2, with equality exactly when u=v.

[L2]

Roots and rational powers (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a, Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, Rational powers ar of a positive base): for c≥0 the symbol c1/2=c is the unique s≥0 with s2=c, and s>0 when c>0; in particular 41/2=2, because 2≥0 and 2⋅2=4.

[L3]

Sign rules (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication): a product of two negative reals is positive and a product of two positive reals is positive; x<0 holds exactly when −x>0; and multiplication by a positive factor preserves the strict order in both directions.

[L4]

Order arithmetic (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Ordered field): adding a constant preserves the strict order, adding two strict inequalities preserves them, and the order is total and transitive.

[L5]

Squares and negatives (Squares of nonzero elements are positive, Multiplication by zero: 0⋅a=0, Sign rules for products: (−a)b=−(ab) and (−a)(−b)=ab): u2>0 for every u≠0, while 02=0⋅0=0, so u2≥0 for every real u; and (−u)v=−(uv), (−u)(−v)=uv.

[L6]

Positivity of the identity (The multiplicative identity is positive): 1>0, hence 2=1+1>0, and by repeated addition every nonzero numeral is positive.

[L7]

Negatives have no real square root (FALSE: every real number has a real square root): there is no real y with y2=−1; the existence theorem Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0} produces square roots only for nonnegative arguments.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1L2L3L4L5L6algebra

At the witness: ab=(−1)(−4)=4 by [L5], so G=41/2=2 by [L2]; the arithmetic mean is A=(−1+(−4))/2=−5/2; and 2>−5/2, because −5/2<0 by [L3] (using 2(−5/2)=−5<0 and the equivalence u<0  ⟺  2u<0, where 2,5>0 by [L6] and [L4]) while 2>0 by [L6], so transitivity in [L4] gives G=2>−5/2=A; thus the claimed inequality fails at (−1,−4).

1.2L2L3L4L5algebra

For arbitrary negative entries a,b<0: the product is positive, ab>0, by [L3]; the root G=(ab)1/2 is then defined and positive by [L2]; and a+b<0 by adding the inequalities a<0 and b<0 in [L4], so 2A=a+b<0, while A≥0 would give 2A≥0 because a product of nonnegatives is nonnegative by [L3] and [L5]; hence A<0, and transitivity gives G>A; so the root form fails for every pair of negative entries, not only at the displayed witness.

1.3L7algebra

The second failure mode: at a=−1, b=1 the product is ab=−1, so G=(−1)1/2 would be a real square root of −1, which does not exist by [L7]; the conclusion of the claimed inequality cannot even be stated there.

1.4L1L5algebra

The squared form survives for all real a,b: with A=(a+b)/2 one has A2−ab=((a+b)2−4ab)/4=(a−b)2/4=((a−b)/2)2≥0 by [L5]; hence ab≤A2 for arbitrary reals, the two-entry squared form of [L1] without any sign hypothesis.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4L1L2∎

Collecting: the root form of the two-term arithmetic-geometric mean inequality fails outright at the witness (step 1.1, where G=2>−5/2=A), fails systematically for every pair of negative entries (step 1.2), and can fail by undefinedness (step 1.3); what the hypothesis a,b≥0 buys is precisely the passage from the squared form ab≤A2, which survives without it (step 1.4), to the root form G≤A, which needs G to exist and A to be nonnegative; the hypothesis is therefore load-bearing and cannot be dropped.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources