Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Middle-dimensional surgery can change an intersection form

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: every framed sphere surgery in the sense of this page, with no restriction below the middle, preserves the middle-dimensional intersection form whenever that form exists.

Counterexample. Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice), as required by Künneth and the intersection/duality supplier. Let M=S2×S2 and let φ be the standard framed embedded surgery sphere S2×{y0} with the framing of the second factor; here m=4, p=2, q=2, so the surgery is middle-dimensional. By the product example the result is S4. The middle-dimensional intersection form of M is the hyperbolic form on H2(M;Z)≅Z2, while H2(S4;Z)=0; hence middle-dimensional surgery changes the middle-dimensional intersection form. Consequently the intersection form is not preserved by middle-dimensional surgery, and the below-middle results of this page, proved under p≤q−2, do not extend to the middle: there the analysis needs the quadratic refinement and the obstruction recorded in the preceding remark.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the manifold M=S2×S2 with its product orientation, the framed sphere S2×{y0} framed by the second factor, and the surgery result of the product example.

[F1]

the local calculation below: with 0≤p≤m−1, q=m−p and M=Sp×Sq, the p-surgery along the standard framed Sp×{y0} produces Sp+q; for p=q=2 this gives S4 from S2×S2.

[F2]

Topological Kunneth short exact sequence for homology: for m,n≥1 the integral homology of Sm×Sn is free on a point class, the two factor sphere classes, and their cross product, in degrees 0,m,n,m+n; when m=n the middle group has rank two.

[F3]

Homology of spheres: H~k(S4;Z)=0 for k≠4, so in particular H2(S4;Z)=0 The cohomological form is transported from homology by the duality in [F6].

[F4]

The geometric intersection pairing on a closed oriented manifold: for a closed oriented smooth n-manifold and closed oriented embedded submanifolds Aa,Bb with a+b=n, the geometric pairing ⟨A,B⟩M=I(iA,B)∈Z is the signed transverse count when A,B are transverse, and depends only on the homotopy classes of the inclusions; a push-off of A along a nowhere-zero normal section is an embedding homotopic to iA and disjoint from A, so the self-intersection of such an A is zero.

[F5]

The homology effect of surgery away from the middle dimensions: for p=2, q=2 the degrees in which the integral homology can change are {2,3,1,2}, confirming that degree two is among the degrees allowed to change at the middle.

[F6]

The geometric intersection number is the Poincare-dual cup pairing: under AC, geometric intersection is the Poincaré-dual cup pairing and depends only on homology classes. It therefore extends bilinearly to all their integral linear combinations; Poincaré duality identifies the homology and cohomology forms used here.

Counterexample

technique · compute the result, then compare the two degree-two intersection pairings
1.1givenconstruct

Removing the standard product tube S2×int⁡D2 from S2×S2 leaves S2×D2, since the complement of the open hemisphere in the second sphere is its opposite closed hemisphere. Product-framed surgery glues in D3×S1 by the identity on S2×S1. The resulting union is ∂(D3×D2) by the disk-factor boundary decomposition. Choose a convex rounding transverse to rays from the origin; its boundary is ρ(u)u for a smooth positive function on S4. Radial projection has smooth inverse u↦ρ(u)u, identifying the boundary with S4 and proving the surgery identification directly.

1.2F1F5given

The datum is middle-dimensional: p=q=2, so 2p+2=6>4=m and the below-middle hypothesis p≤q−2 of the killing lemma fails. The product example [F1] identifies the surgered manifold: the 2-surgery on S2×S2 along the standard framed S2×{y0} is S4, compatible with the degree bounds of [F5] since p=2 and q=2.

2.1F2F3step 1.2

Sphere homology is free, concentrated in degrees 0,2 for S2. The integral Künneth sequence therefore has vanishing Tor terms; in degree two its tensor terms are H2(S2)⊗H0(S2) and H0(S2)⊗H2(S2), each Z, and its cross-product map sends the two generators to the factor sphere classes. Thus the degree-two homology of the source is free of rank two on the two factor sphere classes: by [F2] applied to m=n=2, the classes of A=S2×{y0} and B={x0}×S2 form a basis of H2(S2×S2;Z)≅Z2. The target has H2(S4;Z)=0 by [F3].

3.1F4F6step 2.1algebra

By [F6], intersection gives a bilinear form on the two factor classes. Pushing A=S2×{y0} to S2×{y1} along a short path with y1≠y0 makes it disjoint from A, so A⋅A=0 by [F4]; the analogous push-off of B gives B⋅B=0. At the sole intersection (x0,y0), the ordered tangent spaces of A and B are precisely the two positively oriented factors of TM, so A⋅B=+1. Exchanging the two two-dimensional blocks has sign (−1)2⋅2=+1, giving B⋅A=+1. Thus the matrix in the factor basis is (0110), of determinant −1, the hyperbolic form.

4.1F3F6step 2.1step 3.1

Hence the middle-dimensional intersection pairing of M is a nondegenerate pairing on a rank-two free group, while the corresponding pairing of Mφ=S4 is a pairing on the zero group: by [F3] the middle homology vanishes, and [F6] transports this to middle cohomology, so the form of the surgered manifold is the zero form. The two pairings therefore cannot be identified by any isomorphism of the underlying groups, and the middle-dimensional intersection form is not preserved by the surgery.

5.1F5step 4.1∎

Consequently framed sphere surgery does not preserve the middle-dimensional intersection form: at the middle dimension p=q the form itself can change, a case that the below-middle results of this page, proved under p≤q−2, do not cover, and there the analysis requires the quadratic refinement and the surgery obstruction recorded in the preceding remark.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources