Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The homology effect of surgery away from the middle dimensions

Statement

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let M be a closed smooth m-manifold, 0≤p≤m−1, q=m−p, let φ be a framed embedded surgery sphere with trace Wφ and surgered manifold Mφ, and let A be an abelian group. Then:

(i) Hi(Wφ,M;A)=0 for i≠p+1 and Hp+1(Wφ,M;A)≅A, identified with the coefficient classes of the core disk;

(ii) Hi(Wφ,Mφ;A)=0 for i≠q and Hq(Wφ,Mφ;A)≅A, identified with the coefficient classes of the cocore disk;

(iii) consequently Hi(M;A)→Hi(Wφ;A) is an isomorphism for i∉{p,p+1}, Hi(Mφ;A)→Hi(Wφ;A) is an isomorphism for i∉{q−1,q}, and therefore Hi(M;A)≅Hi(Mφ;A) for every i∉{p,p+1,q−1,q};

(iv) define sA:A→Hp(M;A) by sA(a)=(φ0)∗[Sp]a, where [Sp]a is the sphere fundamental cycle with coefficient a; for p=0 this means the reduced cycle a[x+]−a[x−]. Under the core identification in (i), the connecting map is ±sA, and Hp(Wφ;A)≅Hp(M;A)/im⁡sA. Dually define tA(a)=β∗[Sq−1]a for the belt sphere β, using the reduced cycle when q=1. The dual connecting map is ±tA, and Hq−1(Wφ;A)≅Hq−1(Mφ;A)/im⁡tA. For A=Z, the image is the cyclic subgroup generated by the sphere class. An arbitrary abelian coefficient group need not have a generator.

The only degrees in which the homology can change are p,p+1,q−1,q, exactly as the two relative computations allow.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the closed smooth m-manifold M, integers 0≤p≤m−1 and q=m−p, a framed embedded surgery sphere φ, the trace Wφ, the surgered manifold Mφ, and an abelian group A.

[F3]

The upper boundary of the surgery trace is the surgered manifold: the outgoing face is identified with Mφ, and there are homotopy equivalences of pairs relative to the indicated faces, (Wφ,M)≃(M∪φ0Dp+1,M) and (Wφ,Mφ)≃(Mφ∪βDq,Mφ), where β is the belt-sphere embedding. The characteristic disks include collar paths to the respective faces.

[F4]

Relative homology of the standard handle pair: for any abelian group G and integers 0≤k≤n, the standard handle pair satisfies Hi(Dk×Dn−k,Sk−1×Dn−k;G)≅G for i=k and 0 otherwise.

[F5]

Excision for singular homology: if Z‾⊆int⁡(Y) in a pair (X,Y), removing Z induces relative homology isomorphisms. One first enlarges the base across a short attaching collar by deformation retraction, then excises its portion outside the cell collar; this satisfies the interior condition and leaves a disk relative to a boundary collar, which retracts to the disk-boundary pair.

[F6]

Long exact sequence of a pair: for a pair (Z,Y) there is the exact sequence ⋯→Hi+1(Z,Y;A)→Hi(Y;A)→Hi(Z;A)→Hi(Z,Y;A)→⋯ .

[F7]

Naturality of the homology connecting morphism: the connecting homomorphism of the long exact sequence of a pair is natural with respect to maps of pairs.

[F8]

Relative fundamental class and boundary orientation: the relative fundamental class of a compact oriented manifold with boundary restricts on the boundary to the fundamental class of the boundary in the outward-normal-first convention; in particular the connecting homomorphism of the pair (Dp+1,Sp) sends the relative fundamental class to ±[Sp] (Homology of spheres).

Proof

Given: the objects and hypotheses of the statement.

1.1F3

By [F3] the incoming pair has the cell model (M∪φ0Dp+1,M) and the outgoing pair has (Mφ∪βDq,Mφ). Use the cylinder paths in that model when referring to a characteristic disk with boundary in a face. These are homotopy equivalences of pairs, not a handle attachment directly to the boundaryless manifold M.

2.1F3F4F5F8step 1.1algebra

In the incoming cell model, enlarge M to U=M∪{u:∣u∣>1/2} in the attached disk. The radial boundary collar retracts U onto M, so replacing M by U does not change relative homology. Excise Z=M∪{u:∣u∣>3/4}; its closure is contained in the interior of U, as required by [F5]. The remaining pair is a closed disk of radius 3/4 relative to its collar 1/2<∣u∣≤3/4, whose collar retracts to its boundary. Thus the relative groups are those of (Dp+1,Sp), or the standard handle pair by contraction of its second factor. By [F4] they are A in degree p+1 and zero otherwise. The identification sends each a∈A to the disk's oriented relative cycle with coefficient a, not to a claimed generator of A. This proves (i).

3.1F3F4F5F8step 1.1step 2.1

Apply exactly the collar enlargement and excision of step 2.1 to the outgoing q-cell model of step 1.1. The remaining pair is (Dq,Sq−1), equivalently the handle pair with the disk factors exchanged. By [F4] its homology is A in degree q and zero otherwise; the identification uses the oriented cocore relative cycle with each coefficient a∈A. This includes q=1, whose boundary is a two-point sphere. This proves (ii).

4.1F6step 2.1step 3.1

In the exact sequence of [F6] for the pair (Wφ,M), the relative groups vanish outside degree p+1 by (i): hence Hi(M;A)→Hi(Wφ;A) is an isomorphism for i∉{p,p+1}. Similarly, using (ii), Hi(Mφ;A)→Hi(Wφ;A) is an isomorphism for i∉{q−1,q}. Comparing the two through Hi(Wφ;A) gives Hi(M;A)≅Hi(Mφ;A) outside {p,p+1}∪{q−1,q}. This proves (iii).

5.1F6F7F8step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

The incoming characteristic disk, including its cylinder collar, is a map of pairs (Dp+1,Sp)→(Wφ,M) with boundary φ0. For each a∈A, the boundary of its relative fundamental cycle is [Sp]a by [F8]; at p=0 it is the difference of the two endpoint cycles. Naturality [F7] gives ∂(a)=±sA(a). Since Hp(Wφ,M;A)=0, [F6] makes Hp(M;A)→Hp(Wφ;A) surjective with kernel im⁡sA, giving the stated quotient. Applying the same calculation to the outgoing characteristic disk gives ∂(a)=±tA(a) and the dual quotient. For integral coefficients the image is generated by the image of 1∈Z; no cyclicity is asserted for general A. This proves (iv).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources