How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A light-tailed proposal can give ordinary importance sampling infinite variance
Statement refuted
Full proposal support and finite target variance of are sufficient for ordinary importance sampling to have finite estimator variance.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The claim in “Statement refuted.”
Ordinary importance sampling: Ordinary importance sampling averages over IID proposal draws.
Change of variables for expectation: For a nonnegative measurable function of a random element with law , expectation equals its integral against .
Ordinary importance sampling has finite variance and a CLT under a weighted second moment: Its finite-variance formula assumes and makes no finite-variance claim when that moment is infinite.
Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: For square-integrable real , ; finite variance therefore requires a finite centered second moment.
Ordinary importance sampling is unbiased: Under its support and integrability hypotheses, the ordinary importance sampling estimate has expectation .
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: If nonnegative measurable , then , including infinite integrals.
Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product: for a nonnegative measurable density and nonnegative measurable , , including infinite values.
Counterexample
On with Lebesgue measure, take target density , proposal density , and . Direct integration gives and . Also for every , while has target mean and variance .
Use [F7] with density for integration against . For every , the importance weight is . By [F2], and . The proposal has full target support, but the finite-second-moment hypothesis in [F3] fails.
By [F5], the ordinary estimate has mean . For each finite , nonnegativity gives , hence . Monotonicity [F6] and step 2.1 imply . If its centered second moment were finite, the inequality would imply , a contradiction. Thus the centered second moment is infinite, so the estimate does not have finite variance under [F4]. This refutes the sufficiency claim.
Depends on
- Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product
- Ordinary importance sampling
- Ordinary importance sampling has finite variance and a CLT under a weighted second moment
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Change of variables for expectation
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Ordinary importance sampling is unbiased
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.