How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive sectional curvature with no fixed lower bound on a noncompact manifold
Statement refuted
False claim: every complete, noncompact Riemannian manifold of everywhere positive sectional curvature has sectional curvature bounded below by a positive constant, .
The claim is false already in the simplest noncompact model surface: the paraboloid with the Riemannian metric induced from Euclidean is complete and noncompact, has positive sectional curvature at every point, and its sectional curvature takes the values at the point , so : there is no positive lower bound.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The paraboloid with the metric induced by the Euclidean metric, and the inherited of [A1].
The countable-choice premise is the inherited (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), carried by the hypersurface curvature and submanifold-completeness suppliers used below; the computation itself selects nothing.
For an embedded Euclidean hypersurface of dimension with a smooth unit normal and orthonormal principal directions of principal curvatures , the sectional curvature of is (Euclidean hypersurface sectional curvature from principal curvatures). The principal curvatures are the eigenvalues of the shape operator , so in dimension the only sectional curvature is (Shape operator, Principal curvatures, Gaussian curvature, and mean curvature of an oriented hypersurface).
For a parametrized surface with first fundamental form and second fundamental form , the identity gives in any coordinate basis, so (Induced connection and second fundamental form, Shape operator). For the graph of a smooth over the -plane with unit normal , , one has , , and .
The graph of a smooth map is an embedded submanifold (The graph of a smooth map is an embedded submanifold), and the graph of a continuous map into a Hausdorff space is closed in the product (The graph of a continuous map into a Hausdorff space is closed in the product).
A closed embedded submanifold of a Riemannian manifold whose connected components are complete is complete in the induced Riemannian metric (Closed embedded submanifolds of complete Riemannian manifolds are complete); with the Euclidean metric is a complete metric space ( and for with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in , Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space), and its Riemannian distance is the Euclidean distance (Riemannian distance on a connected manifold).
A metric space is compact exactly when every sequence in it has a convergent subsequence (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space); a convergent sequence in is bounded. The infimum of a nonempty set of reals bounded below is its greatest lower bound (Greatest lower bound (infimum)).
Counterexample
The paraboloid is a complete, noncompact surface. [F3, F4, given] The map , , is smooth and continuous, so its graph is an embedded submanifold of by [F3] and is closed in by [F3]. The Euclidean metric of is complete [F4], and its Riemannian distance is the Euclidean distance; hence [F4] makes complete in the induced Riemannian metric. For noncompactness consider for : the Euclidean norms are unbounded, so has no convergent subsequence and [F5] shows that is not compact.
The curvature at each point. [F1, F2, step 1.1] Parametrize by , so that , and where . The upward unit normal is , and the second fundamental form has matrix By [F2] the shape operator satisfies and By [F1] the sectional curvature of the tangent plane at , the only tangent two-plane of the surface, is .
The curvature is positive but its infimum is zero. [F5, step 2.1] For every the numerator and the denominator are positive, so : the paraboloid has positive sectional curvature everywhere. On the other hand, given any choose with ; then the point has . Hence lies below every value of but no positive number is a lower bound, so the greatest lower bound of the set of values of is by [F5]: a uniform lower bound fails on the complete noncompact manifold , refuting the displayed claim. The paraboloid and the chosen radii are explicit, so the inherited of [A1] is not drawn on beyond its declaration.
Depends on
- Sectional curvature
- Euclidean hypersurface sectional curvature from principal curvatures
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Shape operator
- Principal curvatures, Gaussian curvature, and mean curvature of an oriented hypersurface
- Induced connection and second fundamental form
- Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold
- Riemannian distance on a connected manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is an embedded submanifold
- The graph of a continuous map into a Hausdorff space is closed in the product
- Closed embedded submanifolds of complete Riemannian manifolds are complete
- $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$ for $n \ge 1$ with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in $\mathbb{R}$
- Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space
- Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space
- Greatest lower bound (infimum)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J.-H. Eschenburg, Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)