How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Codimension-one ideals in nilpotent Lie algebras
Statement
If is a proper subalgebra of a finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra , then is contained in an ideal of of codimension one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra and a proper subalgebra .
A nonzero nilpotent Lie algebra has nonzero center (A nonzero nilpotent Lie algebra has nonzero center).
Quotients of nilpotent Lie algebras are nilpotent (Subalgebras, quotients, and finite products of nilpotent Lie algebras).
A quotient by an ideal has a canonical surjective Lie homomorphism (Quotient Lie algebras).
Rank-nullity computes the codimension of an inverse image under a surjective finite-dimensional linear map (Rank-nullity: ).
Proof
If , the only proper subalgebra is , which is itself an ideal of codimension one. The case has no proper subalgebra and is vacuous.
Assume and the assertion for all nilpotent Lie algebras of smaller dimension.
By [L1], choose and put . Then is a one-dimensional central ideal.
The quotient is defined by [L3], has smaller dimension by [L4], and is nilpotent by [L2].
If , then is proper in . By step 1.2 there is a codimension-one ideal containing it. Its inverse image under the quotient map is an ideal containing , and [L4] gives codimension one.
If , set ; centrality makes this a subalgebra. If , then has codimension one and , so it is the required ideal. If is proper, then is proper in ; apply step 1.2 there and take the inverse image as in step 3.1.
The alternatives and , including both subcases of the latter, exhaust all possibilities and each yields a codimension-one ideal containing . The only selections were one central witness and finitely many induction witnesses, so no Choice principle is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Milne, Lie Algebras, Propositions 2.5–2.6 (standard reference, not scraped)