Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonzero-degree map to a connected manifold is surjective

Statement

Let F:MnNn be a proper smooth map between nonempty connected oriented smooth manifolds without boundary. If deg(F)0, then F is surjective. This implication is choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The map and manifolds in the statement.

[F1]

Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology gives MFω=deg(F)Nω for every compactly supported top form ω.

[F2]

Topological manifolds are locally compact and locally path connected supplies, inside any neighbourhood of a point, an open coordinate ball whose closure is compact.

[F4]

A chart bump at a point with prescribed support gives, at a specified point of an open coordinate domain W, a nonnegative smooth bump equal to one there whose support lies in W.

[F5]

Chart integral with its orientation sign computes a compactly supported top form in a positive chart by integrating its coordinate coefficient; the chart-comparison calculation in Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes identifies this chart integral with the manifold integral.

Proof

technique · contradiction by a normalized form supported off the image
1.1

First F[M] is closed. If yF[M], [F2] gives an open neighbourhood V of y whose closure K is compact. Properness makes C=F1(K) compact, so [F3] makes F[C] compact and closed in N. Since F[M]V=F[C]V, the open set VF[C] contains y and misses F[M]. Thus every point of the complement has an open neighbourhood in the complement.

F2F3given
2.1

Suppose n1 and F is not surjective. Fix yNF[M]. By [F2] inside the open complement from step 1.1, choose an oriented coordinate ball U containing y whose closure is compact. By [F4] there is a smooth ρ:N[0,1] with ρ(y)=1 and support contained in U. The support is closed by definition and lies in the compact set U, hence is compact. In the positive chart ϕ:URn, define the global top form ω by ω=ρϕ(dx1dxn) on U and by zero off U; containment of the support in U makes the two formulas agree smoothly near the edge of U.

F2F4step 1.1construct
3.1

Continuity and ρ(y)=1 give a nondegenerate closed coordinate rectangle Q about ϕ(y) on which ρϕ11/2. On a larger bounding rectangle for the compact coordinate support, [F6] and the defining rectangular sum for the constant function give Iϕ(ω)12vol(Q)>0. By [F5], a:=Nω=Iϕ(ω)>0. Hence ν=a1ω is compactly supported and has integral one.

F5F6step 2.1
4.1

The support of ν lies in UNF[M], so Fν=0. Applying [F1] gives 0=MFν=deg(F)Nν=deg(F), contrary to the hypothesis. Thus F is surjective for n1. If n=0, connected nonempty M and N are singletons, and their unique map is already surjective. Empty manifolds are excluded; the zero-degree case makes no assertion. Only one missed point, one chart and one bump are selected, so no choice axiom is used.

F1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources