How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An extraspecial -group is the product of two maximal abelian subgroups meeting in its centre
Statement
Let be an extraspecial -group of order . Then there are maximal abelian subgroups and of , each of order , with
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An extraspecial -group of order with , the quotient and its commutator pairing .
The commutator pairing of relative to is the map determined by (The commutator pairing of an extraspecial -group relative to a chosen generator of its centre).
is the smallest subgroup of containing (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups).
For subgroups , (Subgroup commutators and the lower central series).
Every extraspecial -group is an internal central product of nonabelian subgroups of order with and for (Every extraspecial -group is an internal central product of nonabelian subgroups of order , Internal central products of a finite family of subgroups).
The commutator pairing is well defined, -bilinear and alternating (The commutator pairing is well defined on the central quotient, is bilinear over , and is alternating).
Maximal abelian subgroups of contain , have order , and under the correspondence are exactly the subgroups containing whose image satisfies (In an extraspecial -group of order every maximal abelian subgroup has order ).
In a finite group whose order is prime, every has order and generates (A finite group of prime order is cyclic and every nonidentity element generates it).
For the maps and are inverse inclusion-preserving bijections between subgroups with and subgroups (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of correspond to subgroups of containing , with normality preserved).
If and , then (Second isomorphism theorem for groups: ).
For every group and , the centralizer is a subgroup of ( and are subgroups of ).
For a finite group and , (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
For a finite -group the following are equivalent: is extraspecial; is nonabelian, and is elementary abelian; is nonabelian and has order (Three equivalent descriptions of an extraspecial -group).
Proof
Fix an internal central product decomposition with each nonabelian of order , , for , and .
Each is nonabelian, so it contains elements with nontrivial commutator; choose with . That commutator lies in and is not the identity, so it generates and equals with ; putting with in gives .
The pairing values are , while , and whenever the two elements lie in different factors or are equal, because distinct factors commute elementwise and the pairing is alternating.
Put and . Their generators commute pairwise, so the centraliser of each generator is a subgroup containing all of them and hence contains (respectively ); therefore each generator is central in (respectively ), and and are abelian.
The images and consist of the products and . If is the identity, pairing with gives , so the are independent and ; the same argument with the roles exchanged gives . If , pairing with gives and pairing with gives , so is trivial.
Since is abelian its image satisfies , and the counting formula gives , so and is maximal abelian of order ; likewise for .
In the abelian group the product is a subgroup and the second isomorphism theorem gives , so ; lifting along the correspondence, every has , hence because , and . The correspondence also gives trivial, so .
Finally is generated by commutators of elements of , so it lies in ; and it contains , which generates . Hence .
Remarks
The two subgroups are built from a chosen decomposition and are not canonical; another decomposition may yield the same pair or a different one. What the statement fixes is that a factorisation of this shape exists, with both factors as large as an abelian subgroup can be.
Depends on
- The commutator pairing of an extraspecial $p$-group relative to a chosen generator of its centre
- The commutator pairing is well defined on the central quotient, is bilinear over $\mathbb F_p$, and is alternating
- A subgroup of the central quotient and its orthogonal complement have orders multiplying to the order of the quotient
- In an extraspecial $p$-group of order $p^{1+2n}$ every maximal abelian subgroup has order $p^{1+n}$
- Every extraspecial $p$-group is an internal central product of nonabelian subgroups of order $p^3$
- Internal central products of a finite family of subgroups
- Correspondence theorem: subgroups of $G/N$ correspond to subgroups of $G$ containing $N$, with normality preserved
- Second isomorphism theorem for groups: $H/(H\cap N)\cong HN/N$
- Lagrange's theorem: $|G|=[G:H]|H|$ for every subgroup $H$ of a finite group $G$
- The subgroup $\langle S \rangle$ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup $\langle g \rangle$, and cyclic groups
- The center $Z(G)$ of a group
- Subgroup commutators and the lower central series
- A finite group of prime order is cyclic and every nonidentity element generates it
- $C_G(x)$ and $N_G(H)$ are subgroups of $G$
- Three equivalent descriptions of an extraspecial $p$-group
- The quotient group $G/N$ and coset product $(gN)(hN)=ghN$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. van Beek, Topics in Finite p-Groups, Proposition 2.41(iv) and Theorem 2.40(iv) (standard reference, not scraped)