How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sphere self-maps of degree are exactly the homotopy equivalences
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). For , a continuous self-map is a homotopy equivalence if and only if .
Facts & Assumptions
The ambient reflection has determinant and sends the outward normal at to the outward normal . Consequently it reverses the tangent orientation defined by placing that normal first; it is a smooth involution, hence an orientation-reversing diffeomorphism. The general diffeomorphism-degree theorem gives degree . (Induced boundary orientation, Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).
Given: , an integer and a continuous self-map (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).
Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, and every integer occurs as a degree (Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree).
Degree is multiplicative under composition of proper smooth maps between oriented closed manifolds and the identity has degree ; for continuous sphere self-maps, homotopic maps have equal degree and (Degree is multiplicative under composition, Degree is homotopy invariant and multiplicative under composition, Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology).
The coordinate reflection is an orientation-reversing diffeomorphism and has degree , and any orientation-reversing diffeomorphism between connected oriented boundaryless manifolds has degree (the local calculation, Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).
A map homotopic to a homotopy equivalence is a homotopy equivalence, and the identity is a homotopy equivalence (A continuous map homotopic to a homotopy equivalence is itself a homotopy equivalence, Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).
Proof
(Necessity.) Suppose is a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse . Then , so by [F2] applied to the continuous maps, in ; hence is a unit of , that is .
(Degree .) If , then [F1] gives , and since the identity is a homotopy equivalence, [F4] makes a homotopy equivalence.
(Degree .) If , then for the coordinate reflection of [F3], whose orientation reversal and degree are computed in [L1], so [F1] gives ; the reflection is a diffeomorphism and hence a homotopy equivalence, so [F4] makes a homotopy equivalence.
Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 prove both implications, so a continuous self-map of is a homotopy equivalence exactly when its degree is .
Depends on
- A continuous map homotopic to a homotopy equivalence is itself a homotopy equivalence
- Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree
- Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology
- Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type
- Induced boundary orientation
- Degree is homotopy invariant and multiplicative under composition
- Degree is multiplicative under composition
- Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Victor Guillemin and Alan Pollack, Differential Topology (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel S. Freed, Bordism: Old and New (lecture notes, UT Austin, Fall 2012) (standard reference, not scraped)