How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A sphere reflection has degree minus one
Example
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). For let be the coordinate reflection of , oriented by the outward-normal-first boundary orientation of . Then is a smooth diffeomorphism of reversing orientation, so ; by the sphere classification every self-map of of degree is homotopic to , and by the homotopy-equivalence corollary a self-map of of degree is a homotopy equivalence exactly when it is homotopic to a reflection.
Facts & Assumptions
The ambient reflection has determinant and sends the outward normal at to the outward normal . Consequently it reverses the tangent orientation defined by placing that normal first; it is a smooth involution, hence an orientation-reversing diffeomorphism. The general diffeomorphism-degree theorem gives degree . (Induced boundary orientation, Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).
Given: , an integer , the sphere with its outward-normal-first orientation and the coordinate reflection (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , the local calculation, Induced boundary orientation).
The coordinate reflection restricts to an orientation-reversing smooth diffeomorphism of and has degree (the local calculation, the local calculation).
An orientation-reversing diffeomorphism between nonempty connected oriented boundaryless manifolds has degree (Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).
Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, and every integer occurs as a degree (Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree).
A self-map of is a homotopy equivalence exactly when its degree is (Sphere self-maps of degree are exactly the homotopy equivalences).
Verification
The reflection is the restriction of the invertible linear map of with determinant that preserves the unit sphere, hence restricts to a smooth diffeomorphism of ; the linear reflection reverses the ambient orientation and the outward-normal-first orientation of is transported from the ambient orientation, so reverses the orientation of , and both by the direct reflection computation of [F1] and by the diffeomorphism criterion of [F2].
Let have degree . By [F3] applied to and , whose degrees are equal, is homotopic to ; conversely every map homotopic to has degree by [F3]. By [F4] every self-map of degree is a homotopy equivalence, and by [F3] its homotopy class is that of the reflection, so a map of degree is a homotopy equivalence precisely when it lies in the homotopy class of a reflection.
This identifies the degree- class, represented by a reflection, and shows the consistency of the reflection sign with the general classification; no new invariant or orientation convention is introduced beyond the outward-normal-first orientation of the sphere.
Depends on
- Sphere self-maps of degree $\pm1$ are exactly the homotopy equivalences
- Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree
- Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Induced boundary orientation
- Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Victor Guillemin and Alan Pollack, Differential Topology (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel S. Freed, Bordism: Old and New (lecture notes, UT Austin, Fall 2012) (standard reference, not scraped)