How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Hopf Degree Theorem — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classification of Covering Spaces
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cup Cap Cross Products and Cohomology Rings
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Fibrations Fiber Bundles and Homotopy Exact Sequences
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integration of Forms and the General Stokes Theorem
- Kunneth Exactness and Splittings over Principal Ideal Domains
- Leray–Hirsch, the Thom Isomorphism, and Gysin Sequences
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Orientations Poincare Lefschetz and Alexander Duality
- Oriented and Mod Two Intersection Numbers
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Pontryagin Thom and Framed Cobordism
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sard Theorem and Transversality
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Singular Cohomology and Coefficient Theorems
- Smooth Cobordism Relations Groups and Rings
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Spectra and Stable Homotopy Groups
- Stiefel Whitney and Euler Classes by Universal Constructions
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The De Rham Complex Homotopy and Mayer Vietoris
- The de Rham Theorem and Degree
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Hopf Degree Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Thom Spaces Normal Data and Collapse Maps
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topological Vector Bundles and Grassmannian Classification
- Topology of ℝ
- Trigonometric and Oscillatory Examples in One Variable
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Whitney Embedding Tubular Neighbourhoods and Approximation
2 · Summary
The examples test the classification of the main page. The collapse of oriented disks exhibits the realization construction, circle power maps are classified by their exponent, a reflection realizes degree minus one, and even real projective space uses the mod-two degree because no orientation is available. A counterexample on a disconnected domain shows that the total degree alone does not classify maps once connectedness is dropped. Each item cites the exact statement of the main page that it tests, so the examples serve as a leaf page with no independent construction.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Circle power maps are classified by their exponent
Example
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). For let , (equivalently ), with the counterclockwise orientations. Then , and by the Hopf classification for the maps and are homotopic if and only if . Hence the homotopy classes are in bijection with and the class of a power map is determined by its exponent, consistently with the covering-space computation of circle self-maps.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the unit circle with its counterclockwise orientation and smooth structure, the real line as its universal cover, and the power maps (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, is a universal covering).
For every the power map has ; equivalently the continuous map has degree (Degree of the power map on the circle).
For , degree induces a bijection from to , so two maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree (Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology).
For the quotient covering , the explicit map satisfies and ( is a universal covering). This is an explicit lift of the composite , not a lift of itself.
Verification
By [F1] the degree of is the integer ; the explicit lift of [F3] has period increment , so this increment agrees with the degree already computed by [F1].
Let . If then ; conversely if and are homotopic, [F2] with gives , so the two maps are homotopic exactly when their exponents agree.
Hence the assignment is a bijection from to , inverse to the degree, and a power map is determined up to homotopy by its exponent alone; this matches the covering-space description.
A sphere reflection has degree minus one
Example
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). For let be the coordinate reflection of , oriented by the outward-normal-first boundary orientation of . Then is a smooth diffeomorphism of reversing orientation, so ; by the sphere classification every self-map of of degree is homotopic to , and by the homotopy-equivalence corollary a self-map of of degree is a homotopy equivalence exactly when it is homotopic to a reflection.
Facts & Assumptions
The ambient reflection has determinant and sends the outward normal at to the outward normal . Consequently it reverses the tangent orientation defined by placing that normal first; it is a smooth involution, hence an orientation-reversing diffeomorphism. The general diffeomorphism-degree theorem gives degree . (Induced boundary orientation, Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).
Given: , an integer , the sphere with its outward-normal-first orientation and the coordinate reflection (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , the local calculation, Induced boundary orientation).
The coordinate reflection restricts to an orientation-reversing smooth diffeomorphism of and has degree (the local calculation, the local calculation).
An orientation-reversing diffeomorphism between nonempty connected oriented boundaryless manifolds has degree (Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).
Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, and every integer occurs as a degree (Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree).
A self-map of is a homotopy equivalence exactly when its degree is (Sphere self-maps of degree are exactly the homotopy equivalences).
Verification
The reflection is the restriction of the invertible linear map of with determinant that preserves the unit sphere, hence restricts to a smooth diffeomorphism of ; the linear reflection reverses the ambient orientation and the outward-normal-first orientation of is transported from the ambient orientation, so reverses the orientation of , and both by the direct reflection computation of [F1] and by the diffeomorphism criterion of [F2].
Let have degree . By [F3] applied to and , whose degrees are equal, is homotopic to ; conversely every map homotopic to has degree by [F3]. By [F4] every self-map of degree is a homotopy equivalence, and by [F3] its homotopy class is that of the reflection, so a map of degree is a homotopy equivalence precisely when it lies in the homotopy class of a reflection.
This identifies the degree- class, represented by a reflection, and shows the consistency of the reflection sign with the general classification; no new invariant or orientation convention is introduced beyond the outward-normal-first orientation of the sphere.
Collapsing oriented disks realizes degree
Example
Let be a nonempty closed connected oriented smooth -manifold, , and let . Pick pairwise disjoint closed coordinate balls in . On each ball read the explicit smooth pinch model of Every integer is realized by a map to the sphere through a chart centred at that ball. Choose the chart sign so that ; for this outward-normal-first sphere orientation, . Extend by the same base point outside the balls. The resulting smooth map has the point of the model as a regular value whose preimage is exactly the set of centres of the chosen balls, one point per ball, so that . Choosing all local signs to be gives . For this is the pinch of a single oriented ball, and for the empty family gives the constant map, of degree .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty closed connected oriented smooth -manifold with , an integer , the unit sphere with its standard orientation for which the outward normal of the ball is first, and the explicit model pinch of the realization lemma with its regular value (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , Induced boundary orientation).
For every integer there is a smooth map of degree , constructed by reading the smooth model pinch in pairwise disjoint closed coordinate balls (with a chart orientation chosen for the desired local sign) and extending by the base point; the model satisfies , invertible, and outside the unit ball (Every integer is realized by a map to the sphere).
For a proper smooth map with a nonempty connected oriented closed manifold, a regular value with finite fibre gives , where is the compact-support degree and the signs use the orientations of source and target (Regular-value formula for degree, Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology).
A chart of the oriented manifold is orientation-preserving or orientation-reversing, and the sign of the chart multiplies the local orientation sign of a composition with the chart; carries the stated orientation (Orientation-preserving parametrizations, Oriented smooth manifolds and oriented charts, Induced boundary orientation).
Verification
The realization lemma supplies exactly the objects described: the model with , invertible and off the unit ball, and the glued map which equals read through the -th chart near the centre and elsewhere; its construction and its smoothness are those verified there.
The preimage of under is exactly : each centre gives a preimage by , the model has no other preimage of inside the unit ball, and points outside the balls as well as points of a ball mapping outside the unit ball have value ; the differential is invertible, so is a regular value and is proper because is compact.
By step 1.2 and [F2], with the orientation sign of the -th chart, by [F3]; choosing every chart so that makes the sum equal to . For there is no ball and is constant, with an empty regular fibre over any point different from , so . This realizes every prescribed degree by collapsing oriented disks with the prescribed local signs.
Maps from even projective space to the sphere use mod-two degree
Example
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be even. Then is a closed connected nonorientable smooth -manifold, and the collapse map has mod-two degree . The smooth representative constructed below has as a regular value with the single preimage . The quotient map itself is continuous; it is not asserted to be globally smooth. Constant maps have mod-two degree . Consequently , with the two classes represented by and by a constant map, and the mod-two degree is a complete invariant of free homotopy classes; no integer degree is available because is nonorientable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , an even integer , real projective space with its quotient topology and standard smooth structure, the unit sphere with its smooth structure, and the classical pinch , (Real projective space from affine charts, Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , Real projective bundle and tautological line).
has a CW structure with one cell in each dimension ; the top cell is attached along , so is compact and connected, and is orientable exactly when is odd (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map, Positive-dimensional real projective space is orientable exactly in odd dimension, Real projective space from affine charts, For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact).
The pinch is continuous, equals on , and restricts to a bijection with explicit inverse for , including where it gives ; hence induces a continuous bijection between compact Hausdorff spaces, which is a homeomorphism. Consequently the top-cell quotient gives (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map, For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact). The closed disk and its product with are compact by Heine–Borel; a continuous surjection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is closed and hence quotient, since images of closed subsets are compact and therefore closed (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism, In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones).
Use the specific model of Proof steps 1.1–3.1 in Every integer is realized by a map to the sphere, whose Statement names that construction. Its smooth profile equals on and vanishes outside . With , one has for , for , and for . For with , the model is ; at it is , and for it is . The construction proves that is smooth, for , , and is invertible as a map to .
The mod-two degree is well defined, homotopy invariant, and defined on free homotopy classes of continuous maps; for a smooth map with a regular value of one preimage it equals (The mod-two degree of a map to a sphere, The mod-two degree is well defined and homotopy invariant, Regular and critical points and values).
For a closed connected nonorientable smooth -manifold with , induces a bijection , both values realized (The Hopf mod-two degree theorem for nonorientable domains, Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).
Verification
By [F1], and because is even, is a compact connected nonorientable smooth -manifold with the affine-chart structure. Parametrize its top-cell attachment by for . On the interior, the last-coordinate affine chart gives , with smooth inverse , so restricts to a diffeomorphism onto the open top cell. On the boundary is the antipodal attachment onto . In particular is nonempty and has no boundary.
The continuous collapse map is well defined and continuous, where is the quotient map and is the homeomorphism induced by through [F2]; equivalently on , and is the homeomorphism of [F2], so the identification of the quotient with is exactly the one exhibited by the classical pinch.
The model is constant for . Thus is well defined: only boundary points of are identified, and has the same value on them. It is smooth on the open cell because is a local diffeomorphism there; near the lower skeleton it is constant, since the closed smaller disk has image disjoint from that skeleton. To exhibit a homotopy from to relative to , write , let be the profile of [F3], and set . For define , and set . This is continuous jointly in : near one has , and elsewhere the displayed square root is continuous and nonnegative. Its norm is one, , because , and for it is always . The map is a quotient map by [F2], since its source is compact and its target Hausdorff. Thus this family, constant on its fibres, descends continuously to a homotopy . No radial diffeomorphism or homeomorphism assertion about is needed.
The point is a regular value of with the single preimage : forces by [F3], the differential satisfies by step 1.1, hence is invertible, and points of outside the image of the interior of the disk have value ; therefore by [F4].
Since is homotopic to , [F4] gives ; a constant map has an empty regular fibre over any other value, so its mod-two degree is , and the two values of are realized. By [F5] applied to the nonorientable manifold , the mod-two degree is a bijection , so the classes of and of the constant map are the two classes and no integer degree is available for .
Equal total degree does not classify maps from a disconnected domain
Statement refuted
For every closed oriented smooth -manifold , possibly disconnected, two maps are homotopic if and only if their total degree, the sum of the signed degrees on the connected components, agrees. Counterexample: for take , let be a constant map of into , and put and . Both maps have total degree , but they are not homotopic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , the closed oriented smooth manifold with the orientation of each copy, the identity of and a constant map (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).
The identity map of an oriented closed manifold has degree , while a constant map has degree : the identity has degree by the cited composition proposition, and a constant map factors through a point and has empty regular fibre over any value other than its constant, so the regular-value formula gives degree (Degree is multiplicative under composition, Regular-value formula for degree, Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology).
The total degree of a map on a disjoint union of closed oriented components is the sum of the degrees of its restrictions, and a homotopy of maps of restricts on each component to a homotopy of the restrictions; degrees of proper smooth homotopic maps between closed oriented manifolds agree, and for continuous self-maps of a sphere homotopic maps have equal degree (Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology, Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints, Degree is invariant under proper smooth homotopy, Degree is homotopy invariant and multiplicative under composition).
The Hopf classification requires a connected domain, so it does not apply to ; the connectedness hypothesis is recorded as load-bearing (The Hopf degree theorem for oriented domains, Connectedness is needed for a single degree invariant).
Counterexample
(Equal total degrees.) Let and on . The restrictions to the two components have degrees and in the first case and and in the second, so by [F2] both total degrees equal .
(No homotopy exists.) Suppose were a homotopy from to . Its restriction to the first copy is a homotopy from to between continuous self-maps of the sphere; by the sphere homotopy invariance recorded in [F2], , contradicting from [F1].
There is therefore a closed oriented smooth -manifold, namely , and two maps on it whose total degrees agree but which are not homotopic; the total degree is not a complete invariant for disconnected domains, exactly as recorded in the connectedness remark.