Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Hopf Degree Theorem — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples test the classification of the main page. The collapse of oriented disks exhibits the realization construction, circle power maps are classified by their exponent, a reflection realizes degree minus one, and even real projective space uses the mod-two degree because no orientation is available. A counterexample on a disconnected domain shows that the total degree alone does not classify maps once connectedness is dropped. Each item cites the exact statement of the main page that it tests, so the examples serve as a leaf page with no independent construction.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Circle power maps are classified by their exponent

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). For k∈Z let pk:S1→S1, pk(z)=zk (equivalently pk([t])=[kt]), with the counterclockwise orientations. Then deg⁡(pk)=k, and by the Hopf classification for M=S1 the maps pk and pl are homotopic if and only if k=l. Hence the homotopy classes [S1,S1] are in bijection with Z and the class of a power map is determined by its exponent, consistently with the covering-space computation of circle self-maps.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the unit circle S1 with its counterclockwise orientation and smooth structure, the real line as its universal cover, and the power maps pk (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, R→R/Z is a universal covering).

[F1]

For every m∈Z the power map Pm([t])=[mt] has deg⁡(Pm)=m; equivalently the continuous map pd(z)=zd has degree d (Degree of the power map on the circle).

[F2]

For m≥1, degree induces a bijection from [Sm,Sm] to Z, so two maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree (Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology).

[F3]

For the quotient covering p:R→R/Z, the explicit map p~k(t)=kt satisfies p∘p~k=pk∘p and p~k(t+1)−p~k(t)=k (R→R/Z is a universal covering). This is an explicit lift of the composite pk∘p, not a lift S1→R of pk itself.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F3given

By [F1] the degree of pk is the integer k; the explicit lift of [F3] has period increment k, so this increment agrees with the degree already computed by [F1].

1.2F1F2

Let k,l∈Z. If k=l then pk=pl; conversely if pk and pl are homotopic, [F2] with m=1 gives k=deg⁡(pk)=deg⁡(pl)=l, so the two maps are homotopic exactly when their exponents agree.

2.1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2∎

Hence the assignment k↦[pk] is a bijection from Z to [S1,S1], inverse to the degree, and a power map is determined up to homotopy by its exponent alone; this matches the covering-space description.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A sphere reflection has degree minus one

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). For m≥1 let R(x0,x1,…,xm)=(−x0,x1,…,xm) be the coordinate reflection of Sm, oriented by the outward-normal-first boundary orientation of Sm=∂Dm+1. Then R is a smooth diffeomorphism of Sm reversing orientation, so deg⁡(R)=−1; by the sphere classification every self-map of Sm of degree −1 is homotopic to R, and by the homotopy-equivalence corollary a self-map of Sm of degree −1 is a homotopy equivalence exactly when it is homotopic to a reflection.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

The ambient reflection has determinant −1 and sends the outward normal x at x∈Sm to the outward normal R(x). Consequently it reverses the tangent orientation defined by placing that normal first; it is a smooth involution, hence an orientation-reversing diffeomorphism. The general diffeomorphism-degree theorem gives degree −1. (Induced boundary orientation, Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).

Given: ACω, an integer m≥1, the sphere Sm=∂Dm+1 with its outward-normal-first orientation and the coordinate reflection R (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, the local calculation, Induced boundary orientation).

[F1]

The coordinate reflection restricts to an orientation-reversing smooth diffeomorphism of Sm and has degree −1 (the local calculation, the local calculation).

[F2]

An orientation-reversing diffeomorphism between nonempty connected oriented boundaryless manifolds has degree −1 (Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).

[F3]

Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, and every integer occurs as a degree (Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree).

[F4]

A self-map of Sm is a homotopy equivalence exactly when its degree is ±1 (Sphere self-maps of degree ±1 are exactly the homotopy equivalences).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1F1F2given

The reflection R is the restriction of the invertible linear map of Rm+1 with determinant −1 that preserves the unit sphere, hence restricts to a smooth diffeomorphism of Sm; the linear reflection reverses the ambient orientation and the outward-normal-first orientation of Sm is transported from the ambient orientation, so R reverses the orientation of Sm, and deg⁡(R)=−1 both by the direct reflection computation of [F1] and by the diffeomorphism criterion of [F2].

2.1F3F4step 1.1

Let f:Sm→Sm have degree −1. By [F3] applied to f and R, whose degrees are equal, f is homotopic to R; conversely every map homotopic to R has degree −1 by [F3]. By [F4] every self-map of degree −1 is a homotopy equivalence, and by [F3] its homotopy class is that of the reflection, so a map of degree −1 is a homotopy equivalence precisely when it lies in the homotopy class of a reflection.

3.1F1F3step 2.1∎

This identifies the degree-−1 class, represented by a reflection, and shows the consistency of the reflection sign with the general classification; no new invariant or orientation convention is introduced beyond the outward-normal-first orientation of the sphere.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Collapsing k oriented disks realizes degree k

Example

Let M be a nonempty closed connected oriented smooth m-manifold, m≥1, and let k∈Z. Pick ∣k∣ pairwise disjoint closed coordinate balls in M. On each ball read the explicit smooth pinch model F of Every integer is realized by a map to the sphere through a chart centred at that ball. Choose the chart sign so that sgn⁡(dF0)sgn⁡(dφi)=sgn⁡(k); for this outward-normal-first sphere orientation, sgn⁡(dF0)=(−1)m+1. Extend by the same base point N outside the balls. The resulting smooth map fk:M→Sm has the point y−=F(0) of the model as a regular value whose preimage is exactly the set of centres of the chosen balls, one point per ball, so that deg⁡(fk)=∑i=1∣k∣sgn⁡(dfk,pi). Choosing all local signs to be sgn⁡(k) gives deg⁡(fk)=k. For k=±1 this is the pinch of a single oriented ball, and for k=0 the empty family gives the constant map, of degree 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty closed connected oriented smooth m-manifold M with m≥1, an integer k, the unit sphere Sm⊆Rm+1 with its standard orientation for which the outward normal of the ball is first, and the explicit model pinch F:Rm→Sm of the realization lemma with its regular value y− (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, Induced boundary orientation).

[F1]

For every integer k there is a smooth map M→Sm of degree k, constructed by reading the smooth model pinch F in ∣k∣ pairwise disjoint closed coordinate balls (with a chart orientation chosen for the desired local sign) and extending by the base point; the model satisfies F−1(y−)={0}, dF0 invertible, and F=N outside the unit ball (Every integer is realized by a map to the sphere).

[F2]

For a proper smooth map f:M→Sm with M a nonempty connected oriented closed manifold, a regular value y with finite fibre gives deg⁡(f)=∑x∈f−1(y)sgn⁡(dfx), where deg⁡ is the compact-support degree and the signs use the orientations of source and target (Regular-value formula for degree, Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology).

[F3]

A chart of the oriented manifold M is orientation-preserving or orientation-reversing, and the sign of the chart multiplies the local orientation sign of a composition with the chart; Sm carries the stated orientation (Orientation-preserving parametrizations, Oriented smooth manifolds and oriented charts, Induced boundary orientation).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1given

The realization lemma supplies exactly the objects described: the model F with F−1(y−)={0}, dF0 invertible and F=N off the unit ball, and the glued map fk which equals F read through the i-th chart near the centre pi and N elsewhere; its construction and its smoothness are those verified there.

1.2F1given

The preimage of y− under fk is exactly {p1,…,p∣k∣}: each centre gives a preimage by F(0)=y−, the model has no other preimage of y− inside the unit ball, and points outside the balls as well as points of a ball mapping outside the unit ball have value N≠y−; the differential dfk,pi=dF0∘dφi is invertible, so y− is a regular value and fk is proper because M is compact.

2.1F2F3step 1.2algebra∎

By step 1.2 and [F2], deg⁡(fk)=sgn⁡(dF0)∑i=1∣k∣εi with εi=±1 the orientation sign of the i-th chart, by [F3]; choosing every chart so that sgn⁡(dF0)εi=sgn⁡(k) makes the sum equal to k. For k=0 there is no ball and f0=N is constant, with an empty regular fibre over any point different from N, so deg⁡(f0)=0. This realizes every prescribed degree by collapsing oriented disks with the prescribed local signs.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Maps from even projective space to the sphere use mod-two degree

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let n≥2 be even. Then RPn is a closed connected nonorientable smooth n-manifold, and the collapse map q:RPn→RPn/RPn−1≅Sn has mod-two degree 1. The smooth representative q~ constructed below has y−=(0,…,0,−1) as a regular value with the single preimage π(0). The quotient map q itself is continuous; it is not asserted to be globally smooth. Constant maps have mod-two degree 0. Consequently [RPn,Sn]≅Z/2, with the two classes represented by q and by a constant map, and the mod-two degree is a complete invariant of free homotopy classes; no integer degree is available because RPn is nonorientable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, an even integer n≥2, real projective space RPn=Sn/(x∼−x) with its quotient topology and standard smooth structure, the unit sphere Sn⊆Rn+1 with its smooth structure, and the classical pinch c:Dn→Sn, c(x)=(2x1−∥x∥2, 2∥x∥2−1) (Real projective space from affine charts, Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, Real projective bundle and tautological line).

[F1]

RPn has a CW structure with one cell in each dimension 0,…,n; the top cell is Dn attached along ∂Dn→RPn−1, so RPn is compact and connected, and RPn is orientable exactly when n is odd (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map, Positive-dimensional real projective space is orientable exactly in odd dimension, Real projective space from affine charts, For n≥1, every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact).

[F2]

The pinch c is continuous, equals N=(0,…,0,1) on ∂Dn, and restricts to a bijection c:int⁡Dn→Sn∖{N} with explicit inverse y=(y′,t)↦y′/(2(1−t)/2) for t<1, including t=−1 where it gives 0; hence c induces a continuous bijection Dn/∂Dn→Sn between compact Hausdorff spaces, which is a homeomorphism. Consequently the top-cell quotient gives RPn/RPn−1≅Dn/∂Dn≅Sn (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map, For n≥1, every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact). The closed disk and its product with I are compact by Heine–Borel; a continuous surjection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is closed and hence quotient, since images of closed subsets are compact and therefore closed (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism, In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones).

[F3]

Use the specific model of Proof steps 1.1–3.1 in Every integer is realized by a map to the sphere, whose Statement names that construction. Its smooth profile χ:R→[0,1] equals 1 on [−1/2,1/2] and vanishes outside (−3/4,3/4). With W(s)=1−χ(s)2(1−s), one has W(s)=s for 0≤s≤1/2, W(s)=1 for s≥3/4, and 0<W(s)≤1 for s>0. For s=∣x∣2 with 0<s<1, the model is F(x)=(2W(s)(1−W(s))/s x, 2W(s)−1); at 0 it is y−=(0,…,0,−1), and for s≥1 it is N. The construction proves that F is smooth, F=N for s≥3/4, F−1(y−)={0}, and dF0(v)=(2v,0) is invertible as a map to Ty−Sn.

[F4]

The mod-two degree is well defined, homotopy invariant, and defined on free homotopy classes of continuous maps; for a smooth map with a regular value of one preimage it equals 1 (The mod-two degree of a map to a sphere, The mod-two degree is well defined and homotopy invariant, Regular and critical points and values).

[F5]

For a closed connected nonorientable smooth n-manifold M with n≥1, deg⁡2 induces a bijection [M,Sn]→Z/2, both values realized (The Hopf mod-two degree theorem for nonorientable domains, Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1given

By [F1], and because n is even, RPn is a compact connected nonorientable smooth n-manifold with the affine-chart structure. Parametrize its top-cell attachment by π(x)=[x:1−∣x∣2] for x∈Dn. On the interior, the last-coordinate affine chart gives u=x/1−∣x∣2, with smooth inverse x=u/1+∣u∣2, so π restricts to a diffeomorphism onto the open top cell. On the boundary π(x)=[x:0] is the antipodal attachment onto RPn−1. In particular RPn is nonempty and has no boundary.

1.2F2given

The continuous collapse map q:=cˉ∘Q is well defined and continuous, where Q:RPn→RPn/RPn−1 is the quotient map and cˉ is the homeomorphism RPn/RPn−1→Sn induced by c through [F2]; equivalently q∘π=c on Dn, and cˉ is the homeomorphism of [F2], so the identification of the quotient with Sn is exactly the one exhibited by the classical pinch.

2.1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2construct

The model F is constant N for ∣x∣2≥3/4. Thus q~(π(x))=F(x) is well defined: only boundary points of Dn are identified, and F has the same value on them. It is smooth on the open cell because π is a local diffeomorphism there; near the lower skeleton it is constant, since the closed smaller disk ∣x∣2≤3/4 has image disjoint from that skeleton. To exhibit a homotopy from c to F relative to ∂Dn, write s=∣x∣2, let W(s)=1−χ(s)2(1−s) be the profile of [F3], and set Wτ(s)=(1−τ)s+τW(s). For x≠0 define Cτ(x)=(2Wτ(s)(1−Wτ(s))/s x, 2Wτ(s)−1), and set Cτ(0)=y−. This is continuous jointly in x,τ: near s=0 one has Wτ(s)=s, and elsewhere s>0 the displayed square root is continuous and nonnegative. Its norm is one, C0=c, C1=F because χ≥0, and for s=1 it is always N. The map π×idI:Dn×I→RPn×I is a quotient map by [F2], since its source is compact and its target Hausdorff. Thus this family, constant on its fibres, descends continuously to a homotopy q≃q~. No radial diffeomorphism or homeomorphism assertion about F is needed.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1

The point y−=F(0) is a regular value of q~ with the single preimage π(0): q~(π(x))=F(x)=y− forces x=0 by [F3], the differential satisfies dq~π(0)=dF0∘(dπ0)−1 by step 1.1, hence is invertible, and points of RPn outside the image of the interior of the disk have value N≠y−; therefore deg⁡2(q~)=1 by [F4].

4.1F1F4F5step 1.2step 3.1∎

Since q~ is homotopic to q, [F4] gives deg⁡2(q)=deg⁡2(q~)=1; a constant map has an empty regular fibre over any other value, so its mod-two degree is 0, and the two values of Z/2 are realized. By [F5] applied to the nonorientable manifold RPn, the mod-two degree is a bijection [RPn,Sn]→Z/2, so the classes of q and of the constant map are the two classes and no integer degree is available for RPn.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Equal total degree does not classify maps from a disconnected domain

Statement refuted

For every closed oriented smooth m-manifold M, possibly disconnected, two maps M→Sm are homotopic if and only if their total degree, the sum of the signed degrees on the connected components, agrees. Counterexample: for m≥1 take M=Sm⊔Sm, let c be a constant map of Sm into Sm, and put f=id⁡⊔ c and g=c⊔id⁡. Both maps have total degree 1, but they are not homotopic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer m≥1, the closed oriented smooth manifold M=Sm⊔Sm with the orientation of each copy, the identity id⁡ of Sm and a constant map c:Sm→Sm (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).

[F1]

The identity map of an oriented closed manifold has degree 1, while a constant map has degree 0: the identity has degree 1 by the cited composition proposition, and a constant map factors through a point and has empty regular fibre over any value other than its constant, so the regular-value formula gives degree 0 (Degree is multiplicative under composition, Regular-value formula for degree, Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology).

[F2]

The total degree of a map on a disjoint union of closed oriented components is the sum of the degrees of its restrictions, and a homotopy of maps of M restricts on each component to a homotopy of the restrictions; degrees of proper smooth homotopic maps between closed oriented manifolds agree, and for continuous self-maps of a sphere homotopic maps have equal degree (Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology, Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints, Degree is invariant under proper smooth homotopy, Degree is homotopy invariant and multiplicative under composition).

[F3]

The Hopf classification requires a connected domain, so it does not apply to M; the connectedness hypothesis is recorded as load-bearing (The Hopf degree theorem for oriented domains, Connectedness is needed for a single degree invariant).

Counterexample

technique · constructive
1.1F1F2givenconstruct

(Equal total degrees.) Let f=id⁡⊔c and g=c⊔id⁡ on M=Sm⊔Sm. The restrictions to the two components have degrees 1 and 0 in the first case and 0 and 1 in the second, so by [F2] both total degrees equal 1+0=1=0+1.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

(No homotopy exists.) Suppose H:M×I→Sm were a homotopy from f to g. Its restriction to the first copy Sm×I is a homotopy from id⁡ to c between continuous self-maps of the sphere; by the sphere homotopy invariance recorded in [F2], deg⁡(id⁡)=deg⁡(c), contradicting 1≠0 from [F1].

3.1F3step 2.1discharge-construct∎

There is therefore a closed oriented smooth m-manifold, namely Sm⊔Sm, and two maps on it whose total degrees agree but which are not homotopic; the total degree is not a complete invariant for disconnected domains, exactly as recorded in the connectedness remark.

Sources