Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Circle power maps are classified by their exponent

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). For k∈Z let pk:S1→S1, pk(z)=zk (equivalently pk([t])=[kt]), with the counterclockwise orientations. Then deg⁡(pk)=k, and by the Hopf classification for M=S1 the maps pk and pl are homotopic if and only if k=l. Hence the homotopy classes [S1,S1] are in bijection with Z and the class of a power map is determined by its exponent, consistently with the covering-space computation of circle self-maps.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the unit circle S1 with its counterclockwise orientation and smooth structure, the real line as its universal cover, and the power maps pk (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, R→R/Z is a universal covering).

[F1]

For every m∈Z the power map Pm([t])=[mt] has deg⁡(Pm)=m; equivalently the continuous map pd(z)=zd has degree d (Degree of the power map on the circle).

[F2]

For m≥1, degree induces a bijection from [Sm,Sm] to Z, so two maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree (Sphere self-maps are homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, Degree of a proper smooth map by compact-support cohomology).

[F3]

For the quotient covering p:R→R/Z, the explicit map p~k(t)=kt satisfies p∘p~k=pk∘p and p~k(t+1)−p~k(t)=k (R→R/Z is a universal covering). This is an explicit lift of the composite pk∘p, not a lift S1→R of pk itself.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F3given

By [F1] the degree of pk is the integer k; the explicit lift of [F3] has period increment k, so this increment agrees with the degree already computed by [F1].

1.2F1F2

Let k,l∈Z. If k=l then pk=pl; conversely if pk and pl are homotopic, [F2] with m=1 gives k=deg⁡(pk)=deg⁡(pl)=l, so the two maps are homotopic exactly when their exponents agree.

2.1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2∎

Hence the assignment k↦[pk] is a bijection from Z to [S1,S1], inverse to the degree, and a power map is determined up to homotopy by its exponent alone; this matches the covering-space description.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources