How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Entire harmonic functions of sublinear growth are constant
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and . Use one-based basis labels for . Let or be harmonic. If then is constant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, an integer , a harmonic on all of with .
Under the compact-ball hypotheses, (Harmonic Cauchy estimates in supremum norm).
A continuous function on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point is constant there (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant); the chain rule computes the derivative of a restriction to a line (The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Countable Choice is the standing hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Work under [F3] and fix . For every put . If , then , so .
Apply [F1] with radius and coordinate multi-index for each . With , step 1.1 gives for every .
Letting in step 2.1, the factor and by hypothesis, so ; hence for every .
Therefore is constant: for fixed and each coordinate , if is real-valued then has zero derivative for every real by step 3.1, so it is constant on by [F2]; if is complex-valued, apply [F2] separately to the real and imaginary parts of this line restriction, whose derivatives also vanish by step 3.1. Thus each coordinate line restriction is constant, and changing the coordinates one at a time connects any two points of , so has the same value everywhere. The chain rule identifies each line derivative with the corresponding partial derivative. No bounded-Liouville theorem is invoked; the sublinear growth hypothesis is used exactly in step 3.1.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Harmonic Cauchy estimates in supremum norm
- A function continuous on an interval $I$ whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of $I$ is constant on $I$; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant
- The chain rule for total derivatives: $D(g\circ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))\circ Df(a)$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Leon Simon, Lectures on PDE (2015 rough draft) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (2014) (standard reference, not scraped)