Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Entire harmonic functions of sublinear growth are constant

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and n≥2. Use one-based basis labels ei:=ei−1can for 1≤i≤n. Let u:Rn→R or C be harmonic. If lim⁡R→∞R−1sup⁡BR(0)∣u∣=0, then u is constant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, an integer n≥2, a harmonic u on all of Rn with lim⁡R→∞R−1sup⁡BR(0)∣u∣=0.

[F1]

Under the compact-ball hypotheses, ∣Dαu(x)∣≤Cn,α′r−∣α∣sup⁡Br(x)∣u∣ (Harmonic Cauchy estimates in supremum norm).

[F3]

Countable Choice ACω is the standing hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF3algebra

Work under [F3] and fix x∈Rn. For every R>∣x∣ put ρR:=(R−∣x∣)/2>0. If y∈B‾ρR(x), then ∣y∣≤∣y−x∣+∣x∣≤ρR+∣x∣=(R+∣x∣)/2<R, so B‾ρR(x)⊂BR(0).

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

Apply [F1] with radius ρR and coordinate multi-index α=ei for each i=1,…,n. With Kn:=2nmax⁡iCn,ei′, step 1.1 gives ∣Du(x)∣≤nmax⁡i∣∂iu(x)∣≤nmax⁡iCn,ei′ ρR−1sup⁡BρR(x)∣u∣≤KnRR−∣x∣ R−1sup⁡BR(0)∣u∣ for every R>∣x∣.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Letting R→∞ in step 2.1, the factor R/(R−∣x∣)→1 and R−1sup⁡BR(0)∣u∣→0 by hypothesis, so ∣Du(x)∣≤lim⁡R→∞KnRR−∣x∣R−1sup⁡BR(0)∣u∣=0; hence Du(x)=0 for every x∈Rn.

4.1step 3.1F2∎

Therefore u is constant: for fixed x∈Rn and each coordinate i, if u is real-valued then t↦u(x+tei) has zero derivative for every real t by step 3.1, so it is constant on R by [F2]; if u is complex-valued, apply [F2] separately to the real and imaginary parts of this line restriction, whose derivatives also vanish by step 3.1. Thus each coordinate line restriction is constant, and changing the coordinates one at a time connects any two points of Rn, so u has the same value everywhere. The chain rule identifies each line derivative with the corresponding partial derivative. No bounded-Liouville theorem is invoked; the sublinear growth hypothesis is used exactly in step 3.1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources